Matthew D. Galsky, MD, on Key Takeaways From 2021 ASCO Annual Meeting in Bladder Cancer

Video

CancerNetwork® sat down with Matthew D. Galsky, MD, at the 2021 ASCO Annual Meeting to discuss his thoughts on research he believes has the greatest potential to impact standard of care treatment of bladder cancer.

At the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, CancerNetwork® spoke with Matthew D. Galsky, MD, of Mount Sinai Hospital in New York, regarding bladder-sparing approaches to bladder cancer and how new data may motivate more clinicians to utilize these treatment strategies. Galsky and colleagues presented findings from a study combining bladder-sparing surgery and systemic neoadjuvant therapy with nivolumab and chemotherapy.

Transcript:

I think that the biggest impact from studies at ASCO this year in the bladder cancer field probably have to do with bladder-sparing approaches. They really mark a new dawn in bladder-sparing approaches in bladder cancer in terms of integrating immune checkpoint blockade with radiation, or even without radiation in terms of trying to achieve bladder sparing. This is an approach that’s, of course, been used for decades. It is standard of care. There’s level one evidence for the approach, although it’s not practiced as frequently in some parts of the world as others. It could be that the integration of a new treatment modality into the bladder-sparing arena is a tipping point that is needed to really [motivate] the community to embrace this as a reasonable option for patients with bladder cancer.

Reference

Galsky MD, Daneshmand S, Chan KG, et al. Phase 2 trial of gemcitabine, cisplatin, plus nivolumab with selective bladder sparing in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC): HCRN GU 16-257. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 15):4503. doi:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.4503

Related Videos
Byoung Chul Cho, MD, PhD, highlights ongoing trials assessing intravenous and subcutaneous amivantamab in EGFR-mutant non–small cell lung cancer.
An AI-based system may reduce the time needed to match patients with cancer to suitable clinical trials.
Collaboration among nurses, social workers, and others may help in safely administering outpatient bispecific T-cell engager therapy to patients.
Nurses should be educated on cranial nerve impairment that may affect those with multiple myeloma who receive cilta-cel, says Leslie Bennett, MSN, RN.
Treatment with cilta-cel may give patients with multiple myeloma “more time,” according to Ishmael Applewhite, BSN, RN-BC, OCN.
Nurses may need to help patients with multiple myeloma adjust to walking differently in the event of peripheral neuropathy following cilta-cel.
Tailoring neoadjuvant therapy regimens for patients with mismatch repair deficient gastroesophageal cancer represents a future step in terms of research.
Not much is currently known about the factors that may predict pathologic responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this population, says Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD.
Related Content