New Study Findings Will Generate Better Contralateral Breast Cancer Treatment Discussions Between Providers and Patients, Says Expert

Video

Recent study findings related to risk factors for developing contralateral breast cancer may better influence treatment decisions between patients and physicians, according to a Mayo Clinic expert.

During the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS), CancerNetwork® spoke with Siddhartha Yadav, MD, MBBS, a medical oncologist and assistant professor of Medicine and Oncology at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, about the possible practice-changing implications of findings from the population-based prospective CARRIERS study.

According to Yadav, identifying germline mutations such as ATM, CHEK2, or PALB2 as risk factors for contralateral breast cancer will help generate discussions between physicians and their patients on appropriate treatment options. A contralateral prophylactic mastectomy, for instance, may be more or less suitable for patients depending on factors such as the presence of germline mutations or menopausal status.

“We have provided more evidence and numbers to actually guide those decision-making processes [between patients and physicians],” Yadav said.

Transcript:

Today, at least, we did not know how to best manage contralateral breast cancer risk in germline mutation carriers in moderate risk [factors] such as ATM, CHEK2, or PALB2. Now, we have provided this data that says that this is the risk of developing contralateral breast cancer in some of these mutation carriers. What this will eventually lead to is a discussion between patients and their physicians to say, "well, based on your risk, these are the things that we should be thinking about." Right now, if the risk is quite high, for instance, for a BRCA1 mutation carrier who is premenopausal, we see that the risks are quite significantly elevated.

Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy could be considered, whereas for some women over the age of 65, even if they are BRCA1 mutation carriers, we can now provide the risk estimates and say, "do you really need a contralateral prophylactic mastectomy?" A lot of these are still in discussion between patients and the physicians. But now, we have provided more evidence and numbers to actually guide those decision-making processes.

Reference

Yadav S, Boddicker NJ, Na J, et al. Population-based estimates of contralateral breast cancer risk among carriers of germline pathogenic variants in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and PALB2. Presented at the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; December 6-10, 2022; San Antonio, TX. Abstract GS4-04.

Related Videos
Investigators must continue to explore the space for lisocabtagene maraleucel in mantle cell lymphoma, according to Manali Kamdar, MD.
Those with CML should discuss adverse effects such as nausea or fatigue with their providers to help optimize their quality of life during treatment.
Patients with CML can become an active part of their treatment plan by discussing any questions that come to mind with their providers.
Jorge E. Cortes, MD, emphasizes proper communication between patients with chronic myeloid leukemia and their providers during the treatment course.
Dietary interventions or other medications may help mitigate diarrhea in patients who undergo therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia.
Whether CAR T-cell therapy or T-cell engagers should dominate the multiple myeloma landscape may be hard to determine, says David S. Siegel, MD.
Next steps for research in the multiple myeloma space may include the development of novel CAR T-cell strategies and bispecific antibodies.
Related Content