We've noticed that you're using an ad blocker

Our content is brought to you free of charge because of the support of our advertisers. To continue enjoying our content, please turn off your ad blocker.

It's off now Dismiss How do I disable my ad blocker?
❌

How to disable your ad blocker for our site:

Adblock / Adblock Plus
  • Click on the AdBlock / AdBlock Plus icon on the top right of your browser.
  • Click “Don’t run on pages on this domain.” OR “Enabled on this site.”
  • Close this help box and click "It's off now".
Firefox Tracking Prevention
  • If you are Private Browsing in Firefox, "Tracking Protection" may casue the adblock notice to show. It can be temporarily disabled by clicking the "shield" icon in the address bar.
  • Close this help box and click "It's off now".
Ghostery
  • Click the Ghostery icon on your browser.
  • In Ghostery versions < 6.0 click “Whitelist site.” in version 6.0 click “Trust site.”
  • Close this help box and click "It's off now".
uBlock / uBlock Origin
  • Click the uBlock / uBlock Origin icon on your browser.
  • Click the “power” button in the menu that appears to whitelist the current website
  • Close this help box and click "It's off now".
  • ONCOLOGY
  • News
  • Blogs
  • Topics
  • Hematology
  • Image IQ
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Slideshows
  • Conferences

Modern Medicine Network
  • Login
  • Register
Skip to main content
Modern Medicine Network
  • Login
  • Register
Menu
User
Home
  • ONCOLOGY
  • News
  • Blogs
  • Topics
  • Hematology
  • Image IQ
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Slideshows
  • Conferences

SUBSCRIBE: Print / eNewsletter

Diet Low in Fat May Reduce Areas of Density

Jun 1, 1997
Volume: 
6
Issue: 
6
  • Breast Cancer

NEW ORLEANS--Adoption of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet reduces the
area of mammographic densities in the breast, a strong risk factor for
breast cancer, Norman F. Boyd, MD, of the Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto,
reported at the American Society for Preventive Oncology meeting.

Dr. Boyd's data came from the Canadian Diet and Breast Cancer Prevention
Study Group, a randomized trial of dietary prevention. This controlled
analysis included a subgroup of more than 800 women from the 3,700 women
enrolled in the study.

Radiologic variations in the appearance of the breast are associated
with variations in the risk for breast cancer, Dr. Boyd said. The risk
is as much as nine times greater in women aged 50 to 65, who have the most
density, especially in proportion to their total breast tissue.

"This prompted us to do a randomized controlled trial in patients
with extensive densities," he said.

The intervention group was instructed to decrease dietary fat to 15%
of calories and to increase complex carbohydrates. Food records show that
60% of the intervention group managed to achieve a diet that was within
5% of the target goal.

Subjects received mammograms two and four years after randomization,
which were digitized and compared to baseline studies. An image processing
system measured the area of the breast, the area of density, and the percent
of breast area occupied by radiologically dense tissue.

Significant decreases in areas of density were found for women in the
intervention group, compared with their own baseline images and with the
control group. At two years, the diet intervention group had a reduction
of 3 cm² in areas of mammographic density versus a reduction of 1.2
cm² in controls. At four years, the reduction was 7 cm2 for the intervention
group and 4 cm2 for controls, Dr. Boyd reported.

In percent of breast area occupied by density, there was no difference
at two years, but, at four years, the intervention group had a greater
reduction.

Age at entry and change in menopausal status from baseline to four years
were both associated with changes in the area of density, but change in
weight was not. After controlling for these variables in multiple regression
analysis, a low-fat diet still remained significantly associated with a
reduction in the area of density.

Women who entered menopause during the study had the greatest reduction
in area of mammographic density: 20%, as compared with a 10% reduction
in controls. Hormone replacement therapy did not seem to have an influence.

Dr. Boyd said that further observation is needed to determine whether
these changes in areas of density are associated with a reduction in breast
cancer risk.

Related Articles

  • OncoMasTR Assay May Help Some Breast Cancer Patients Avoid Chemo
  • RAD51 Linked With PARP Inhibitor Resistance in BRCA-Mutated Breast Cancer
  • HER2+ Breast Cancer Subtypes Resistant to TKIs Through Differing Mechanisms
  • COUNTERPOINT: LHRH Agonists vs Ovarian Ablation for Suppression of Ovarian Function in Premenopausal Breast Cancer Patients
  • POINT: LHRH Agonists vs Ovarian Ablation for Suppression of Ovarian Function in Premenopausal Breast Cancer Patients

Resource Topics rightRail

  • Resource Topics
  • Partner Content
Breast Cancer
Lung Cancer
Prostate Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Melanoma
Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphomas: Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome
3 Keys to Success in the Oncology Care Model

Current Issue

Oncology Vol 32 No 4
Apr 15, 2018 Vol 32 No 4
Digital Edition
Subscribe
Connect with Us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
Modern Medicine Network
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Advertiser Terms
  • Privacy statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Editorial & Advertising Policy
  • Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
Modern Medicine Network
© UBM 2018, All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited.