NCCN Reveals New Venous Thromboembolism Guideline

NCCN Reveals New Venous Thromboembolism Guideline

HOLLYWOOD, FL—"Cancer increases the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) by four- to sevenfold, and is a precipitating factor in almost 20% of VTEs," Michael B. Streiff, MD, said at the 11th Annual Conference of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). In a survey of 3,891 respondents, he said, Kakkar et al found that 52% of surgical oncology patients received VTE prophylaxis, and only 5% of medical oncology patients (Oncologist 8:381-388, 2003). "We're not doing the job we should be doing," said Dr. Streiff, of the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions. Dr. Streiff and Lawrence D. Wagman, MD, of City of Hope Cancer Center, discussed the NCCN response to this problem, a new NCCN Venous Thromboembolic Disease clinical care guideline. Dr. Wagman chaired the VTE Guideline Committee.

Several strategies have been successful in reducing rates of VTE. Kucher et al (N Engl J Med 352:969-977, 2005) found that a simple computer alert system reminding physicians that a specific patient should be considered for prophylaxis succeeded in cutting the rate of VTE in half in 90 days at one center. The new guideline includes a risk factor assessment for helping select patients for prophylaxis.

Dr. Streiff noted that low-molecular-weight-heparin (LMWH) appears to hold a slight advantage over unfractionated heparin (UFH) for prophylaxis of VTE, but pointed out that the confidence intervals in these studies overlap. "Choose whichever agent you like. The most important thing is to choose something," he said. Recommended anticoagulants include the LMWHs dalteparin (Fragmin), enoxaparin (Lovenox), and tinzaparin (Innohep), and the pentasaccharide fondaparinux (Arixtra), as well as UFH.

Timing also matters. The mean time to VTE after cancer surgery is 17 days, and risk continues for a considerable time. "Prophylaxis must be continued after the patient leaves the hospital," Dr. Streiff said. He advised clinicians to consider long periods of VTE prophylaxis, up to 30 days. He pointed out that Bergqvist et al (N Engl J Med 346:975-980, 2002) found a significant decrease in VTE in patients given anticoagulant prophylaxis for 30 days after surgery, and an even greater benefit with 90 days of anticoagulant prophylaxis.

Mechanical methods such as compression stockings should be considered when anticoagulants are contraindicated, but Dr. Streiff said that pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis is preferable. "Compliance with mechanical prophylaxis outside clinical trials is poor," he said.

Central venous catheter thrombosis is an obvious concern, since such catheters have historically been the site of up to one-quarter of clots in cancer patients, but Dr. Streiff said that the risk has decreased over time due to improvements in catheter materials and prophylaxis. He noted that the NCCN reviewers concluded that there are "inadequate data to suggest that all patients with central catheters should receive prophylaxis."

Renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance less than 30 mL/min) is a red flag, and Dr. Streiff said that LMWH should be used with caution in such patients and that fondaparinux probably should not be used in this setting due to its long half-life. Similarly, LMWH and fondaparinux should be avoided in patients with epidural catheters.


Loading comments...
Please Wait 20 seconds or click here to close