CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » Complications

ONCOLOGY. Vol. 23 No. 13
Pages: 1  2  3  4  
Next
FDA Approval Summary 

Eltrombopag for the Treatment of Chronic Immune (Idiopathic) Thrombocytopenic Purpura

By Andrew Dmytrijuk, MD
Kathy Robie-Suh, MD, PhD
Dwaine Rieves, MD
Richard Pazdur, MD
Office of Oncology Drug Products
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
US Food and Drug Administration
Silver Spring, Maryland | November 30, 2009

Financial Disclosure: All authors are employees of the US Food and Drug Administration and are strictly prohibited from any financial relationship with commercial interests regulated by FDA. This is a work of the US government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States.

ABSTRACT
Purpose: On November 20, 2008, eltrombopag (Promacta) received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) who have had an insufficient response to corticosteroids, immunoglobulins, or splenectomy. This report summarizes the FDA analyses of the clinical data supporting this approval.

Experimental Design: The FDA reviewed data from two double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical studies, an uncontrolled extension study, and exploratory supportive studies. One study randomized patients among placebo or one of three daily doses of eltrombopag (30, 50, or 75 mg). The other study randomized patients between placebo or eltrombopag, 50 mg daily. Study drugs were administered for 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was response rate. Patients who completed these and other studies were eligible to enroll in the extension study.

Results: Overall, 231 patients were randomized within the two controlled studies (67 to placebo; 164 to eltrombopag). A platelet response was observed among 59% and 70% of the patients receiving eltrombopag, 50 mg daily. Corresponding placebo response rates were 16% and 11%, respectively. Serious hemorrhages occurred among two patients receiving eltrombopag and one patient receiving placebo, and among five patients following discontinuation of eltrombopag. In the extension study, eltrombopag was administered to 109 patients; median platelet counts were > 50 x 109/L throughout the study’s quarterly follow-up points. Major safety findings pertained to a risk for hepatotoxicity, worsened thrombocytopenia with hemorrhage following eltrombopag discontinuation, and bone marrow reticulin formation.

Conclusions: The US FDA approved eltrombopag for use among certain patients with chronic ITP based upon demonstration of a favorable risk-to-benefit profile, where the major benefit pertained to demonstration of a clinically important increase in blood platelets among a population of patients relatively refractory to prior therapies.


On November 20, 2008, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted accelerated approval for eltrombopag (Promacta Tablets, GlaxoSmithKline) for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) who have had an insufficient response to corticosteroids, immunoglobulin therapy, or splenectomy.

Eltrombopag is a chemically synthesized thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonist for oral administration. The drug interacts with the transmembrane domain of the TPO receptor (also known as cMPL), leading to increased platelet production by megakaryocytes in the bone marrow.[1] The marketing approval was based upon demonstration of a favorable risk-to-benefit profile, where the major benefit pertained to demonstration of a clinically important increase in blood platelets among a population of patients with chronic ITP relatively refractory to prior therapies. Among this patient population, FDA regarded a durable platelet response as an established surrogate for clinical benefit. This determination was based upon the well-characterized pathophysiology of chronic ITP, including the etiologic role of severe thrombocytopenia in hemorrhage.[2]

(MORE: Update on Eltrombopag for ITP)

Clinical and Regulatory Background

ITP is generally regarded as a disorder characterized by autoantibody-induced platelet destruction, thrombocytopenia, and “inappropriately” reduced platelet production.[3] Acute ITP occurs predominantly among children and is generally self-limited. Chronic ITP occurs mainly among adults, and spontaneous recovery is uncommon. The overall incidence of ITP among adults has been estimated to range from 1.6 to 6.6 per 100,000 persons/year of observation.[4] The frequency of death from hemorrhage in patients with platelet counts below 30 × 109/L has been estimated to range between 1.6% and 3.9% per patient-year, although this risk is importantly affected by age as well as the degree and duration of thrombocytopenia.[5] Intracranial hemorrhage is generally recognized as the most serious and life-threatening complication.[6,7]

The diagnosis of ITP is based mainly upon the detection of thrombocytopenia—the laboratory hallmark of the condition—and the exclusion of secondary causes of the thrombocytopenia. The major goal of chronic ITP therapy is to reduce the risk for hemorrhage. Hemorrhagic risk generally correlates with severity of thrombocytopenia; generally, medical treatment is initiated for platelet counts below 30 × 109/L.[8] In the face of a hemostatic challenge such as surgery, platelet counts ≥ 50 × 109/L may be necessary to minimize hemorrhagic risk.

The therapy for most patients with chronic ITP predominantly consists of medications intended to increase platelet counts. Corticosteroids, generally the initial therapy, produce durable platelet responses in many patients. Other medications that have been shown to increase platelet counts, mostly for a relatively short period of time, consist of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) and anti-D immunoglobulin.[9] Failure to respond sufficiently to these medications may result in the use of various other immunomodulatory medications (such as rituximab(Drug information on rituximab) [Rituxan] or azathioprine(Drug information on azathioprine)) as well as the performance of splenectomy.[10] Splenectomy may result in a durable platelet response, although some patients remain refractory to the procedure. Few therapeutic options have proven beneficial in the refractory setting.

The thrombocytopenia in chronic ITP is thought to result primarily from enhanced platelet destruction. However, reduced platelet formation is also proposed as a contributor to the thrombocytopenia, as evidenced by “inappropriately” low TPO blood levels among patients with chronic ITP.[11] Additionally, in vitro studies have found evidence for deficient platelet production in patients with ITP.[12] Consequently, the development of TPO-receptor agonist molecules prompted manufacturers to explore the use of these molecules among patients with chronic ITP. In August 2008, FDA approved one of these molecules, romiplostim (Nplate), a biologic product for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic ITP who have had an insufficient response to corticosteroids, immunoglobulins, or splenectomy.[13,14]

The clinical development of eltrombopag was targeted toward two potential clinical uses of the drug among patients with relatively refractory chronic ITP: first, as “short-term,” episodic therapy for patients experiencing an acute hemorrhage risk, and second, as “long-term” therapy for patients at continuous risk for hemorrhage. Initial clinical studies showed that eltrombopag increased platelet counts in a dose-related manner among healthy subjects and patients with chronic ITP.[15] With the manufacturer’s initial focus on use of the drug among patients with chronic ITP, FDA designated eltrombopag as an orphan drug, based on the rarity of the condition (a condition affecting less than 200,000 Americans). In December 2007, the manufacturer submitted a New Drug Application (NDA) focused on approval of the drug for short-term treatment among previously treated patients with chronic ITP.

Pages: 1  2  3  4  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.

This article reviewed

Update on Eltrombopag for ITP






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 

 
PUBLICATIONS
ONCOLOGY Journal ONCOLOGY Nurse Edition Journal Cancer Management: A Multidisciplinary Approach

ONCOLOGY

ONCOLOGY:
Nurse Edition

CANCER
MANAGEMENT
:
A Multidisciplinary
Approach


 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Skin Lesions
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • New AUA Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Screening
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • Genomics Studies Identify Testicular Cancer Risk Variants
  • Lower Back Pain in an Elderly Man With a History of Localized Prostate Cancer
  • FDA Approves Erlotinib (Tarceva) as First-Line Lung Cancer Therapy for Certain Patients
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Financial Toxicity, Part II: How Can We Help With the Burden of Treatment-Related Costs?
  • Patient Quality of Life Endpoints in Oncology Trials, Part II
  • Who's Coding Whom?
  • “How Do I Say This Nicely? Your Oncologist Wasn't Following Guidelines”
  • Study: Cholesterol Drugs Reduced Risk of Prostate Cancer Death
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • ONS: Safe Handling of Chemotherapy
  • Financial Toxicity, Part II: How Can We Help With the Burden of Treatment-Related Costs?
  • Conflicts of Interest in Medicine: What About Ties to Payers?
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter



CancerNetwork on Facebook
 
SearchMedica SEARCH RESULTS

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on Oncologic Complications
Evidence on Oncologic Complications
Guidelines on Oncologic Complications
Patient Education on Oncologic Complications
Clinical Trials on Oncologic Complications
Practical Articles on Oncologic Complications
Research and Reviews on Oncologic Complications
All "Oncologic Complications" results

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy