CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home »

ONCOLOGY. Vol. 14 No. 4
 

NCI Publishes Cancer Mortality Atlas

April 1, 2000

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) has published a new atlas, the Atlas of Cancer Mortality in the United States, 1950-94, showing the geographic patterns of cancer death rates in over 3,000 counties across the country over more than 4 decades. Except for the United States, few countries have mapped cancer mortality data over such an extensive time period and in such geographic detail, making this atlas a unique resource.

The 254 color-coded maps in the atlas will make it easy for researchers and state health departments to identify places where high or low cancer rates occur, and to uncover patterns of cancer that would escape notice if larger areas, such as states, were mapped. The atlas will not tell researchers why death rates are higher in certain localities than in others, but it will provide important clues for further in-depth studies into the causes and control of cancer.

Both White and Black Populations Mapped

For the first time, maps will be presented for both white and black populations, since earlier mortality statistics lacked data that would have permitted a separation of blacks from the nonwhite category. In addition, the patterns for liver cancer and for biliary tract cancer will be shown for the first time. Previous disease classification schemes did not allow for separate analyses of these cancers.

“It’s not easy to sort out why cancer mortality rates vary among geographic areas and why they might be changing,” said Joseph F. Fraumeni Jr, md, director of NCI’s Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, and the senior author of the current and earlier atlases. “It’s natural to want to know why cancer rates are elevated in a particular area, but it’s important not to jump to conclusions before careful studies can be conducted in these areas.”

Patterns for Specific Cancers

Many of the patterns displayed in the current atlas are very similar to previous ones. High breast cancer rates, for instance, have been seen for 4 decades in urban centers in the Northeast. Studies have shown that regional variations in breast cancer rates are partially, but not entirely, due to established risk factors, including late age at first birth, early menarche, and late menopause, and to certain other factors, including education and mammography history.

Likewise, colon cancer mortality rates have been elevated in the Northeast for at least 4 decades. Dietary and nutritional factors are thought to be involved, but the specific causative elements are not clear.

Provocative Geographic Changes in Certain Cancers

“There are some geographic changes over time, however, that are particularly provocative,” said Susan S. Devesa, PhD, also from NCI’s Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics. “The greatest changes are seen with lung cancer. The national annual lung cancer rate among white men rose from 39 per 100,000 during 1950 to 1969 to 69 per 100,000 during 1970 to 1994,” said Dr. DeVesa, lead author of the atlas.

In earlier atlases, elevated rates were seen in men in the Northeast and southern coastal areas of the United States. The highest rates now occur among white men in broad stretches across the South, among white women in the far West, and among the black population in northern urban areas,” she explained. “These changes generally coincide with regional and time trends in cigarette smoking.”

The patterns of prostate cancer deaths, which in the past showed little distinct geographic variation, have also changed. High rates among white men are much more prominent now in the north central areas. In contrast, among black men, rates are excessive in the southeastern United States, particularly in rural areas.

“We don’t know right now why the patterns for prostate cancer are changing,” said Robert N. Hoover, MD, also from the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics and an author of both current and past atlases. “But the atlas provides clues that will stimulate efforts to find out what characteristics of these populations and their exposures are responsible for the higher rates.”

Studies Prompted by Atlas Findings

Earlier atlases have been successful in generating leads that prompted further studies, particularly in high-risk areas of the country. The results of these studies are reported in the new atlas. The findings include the following:

  • The high rates of lung cancer among men in southern coastal areas were related to asbestos exposure resulting from work in shipyards, particularly during World War II.

  • Elevated death rates for mouth and throat cancers among women living in the rural South were associated with use of smokeless tobacco.

  • High death rates of esophageal cancer in Washington, DC, and the coastal areas of South Carolina were linked to alcohol(Drug information on alcohol) consumption and tobacco use, along with deficiencies in fruit and vegetable consumption.

  • High lung cancer death rates were seen not only among smelter workers but also among people who live close to arsenic-emitting smelters.

  • High colon cancer death rates in eastern Nebraska occurred mainly among persons of Czechoslovakian background, in whom dietary factors appeared to contribute to the risk.

“We’ve discovered that the reasons for high rates are quite varied,” said Hoover. “Sometimes they’re due to occupational exposures. For example, in addition to lung cancer in shipyard workers, we’ve seen elevated rates of nasal cancer among furniture and textile workers in particular areas of the Southeast. On the other hand, increased rates may be due to general environmental exposures, such as arsenic and lung cancer, or lifestyle differences, such as the regional patterns for breast cancer and, most likely, colon cancer.”

One study has already been initiated in response to the new atlas. Bladder cancer among men has tended to cluster in the urban Northeast since the 1950s, particularly in areas with chemical industries. Previous studies in high-risk areas have also shown elevated risks among truck drivers and other workers exposed to motor exhaust. The main risk factor is cigarette smoking, which accounts for one-half of bladder cancer cases. However, the new atlas has shown that Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire, and upstate New York have elevated rates in both genders that have become more pronounced over time.

“We have been working with the states and with some of the academic departments in these states to develop a pilot study to pursue some of the current hypotheses for why the rates for bladder cancer have become more pronounced,” said Hoover.

There are, however, some limitations to the atlas data. The atlas is less useful in generating research leads for cancer sites in which death rates do not vary much across the country, such as cancers of the pancreas and brain. In addition, for cancer sites with higher survival rates, such as breast and cervix, it is difficult to tell whether the geographic variation reflects environmental influences, factors related to medical care and health care delivery systems, reporting practices, migration patterns, or combinations of these variables.

Atlas Web Site

The Atlas of Cancer Mortality in the United States, 1950-94, is a continuation of the cancer mapping project of the NCI’s epidemiology program. The first atlas with color-coded mortality maps at the county level was published in 1975 and covered the years 1950 1969. The current atlas adds 25 years of data to the original atlas and compares the patterns for 1950 to 1969 with those for 1970 to 1994. In addition, for the first time, an interactive version of the data will be available on the Internet.

Web accessibility makes several new features possible. Not only can the maps, text, tables, and figures from the hard copy be downloaded from the web site, but national and state mortality rates are also available, as are the tabulated data used to generate the maps. Another feature of the atlas web site is that the user can create customized maps. For example, the user can compare rates in different time periods, look at rates for any cancer in any county, zoom and pan different areas of the country, and make color selections. The atlas web site can be found at the following address: http://www.nci.nih.gov/atlas.

To order a single printed copy of the atlas, call NCI’s Cancer Information Service at 1-800-4-CANCER (1-800-422-6237). The atlas may also be ordered on NCI’s on-line publications locator service at http://publications.nci.nih.gov. The telephone number for callers with TTY equipment is 1-800-332-8615.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
IMAGE IQ

Lower Back Pain in an Elderly Man With a History of Localized Prostate Cancer
James B. Yu, MD1 , May 17, 2013

A 70-year-old man with a history of localized prostate cancer treated with whole-pelvis radiation therapy with a boost to the prostate, in conjunction with androgen deprivation therapy 7 years prior, presented with lower back pain. A bone scan revealed an area of activity in the sacrum. What is the most likely diagnosis?

More Image IQs 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Five Steps to Improving Patient Access
Judy Capko,  May 21, 2013
Patient access is getting increased attention through reform initiatives. Here are five steps you can take to make sure patients get appropriate access to care in your office.
Growing HIPAA Threat – Ignore Windows XP at Your Own Peril
Marion K. Jenkins,  May 21, 2013
Chances are good that you have some major ticking software time bombs lurking in your medical practice's computer environment, namely Windows XP and Server 2003.
Finding Physician Work-Life Balance in the Small Moments
Jennifer Frank, MD,  May 21, 2013
At my practice and at home, things are always busy. There's laundry or homework, or a patient with needs.
Three Areas to Reduce Costs at Your Medical Practice
Greg Mertz,  May 19, 2013
By taking a hard look at reducing costs for staffing, overhead, and technology at your medical practice, you may see increased physician compensation.
Dos and Don’ts for Starting a Physician Blog
Michael Woo-Ming, MD,  May 18, 2013
Starting a physician blog can provide your medical practice with marketing benefits, but it's important to do it right.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • The ABCDEs of Moles and Melanomas
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • Bone Metastases
  • Palliative Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Bone Metastases Improves Quality of Life
  • Staying Fit Could Ward Off Lung and Colorectal Cancer for Middle-Age Men
  • Obesity Impairs Efficacy of L-Asparaginase in Leukemia Treatment
  • New AUA Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Screening
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Financial Toxicity, Part II: How Can We Help With the Burden of Treatment-Related Costs?
  • Patient Quality of Life Endpoints in Oncology Trials, Part II
  • Who's Coding Whom?
  • “How Do I Say This Nicely? Your Oncologist Wasn't Following Guidelines”
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • Cancer Metabolism as a Therapeutic Target
  • Study: Cholesterol Drugs Reduced Risk of Prostate Cancer Death
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • ONS: Safe Handling of Chemotherapy
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter



CancerNetwork on Facebook

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy