The 6th University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Investigators'
Workshop was held on July 16-20, 2003, in Amelia Island, Florida.
The purpose of these annual workshops has been to review the latest data on
new agents, with a particular emphasis on the broadly used agent irinotecan(Drug information on irinotecan)
(Camptosar), and also novel regimens or agents.
Investigators from around the world are invited to present current research. The
forums are highly interactive and frank, thus allowing stimulation of new ideas,
directions, and potential investigative collaborations. Also, the use of case studies
and poster sessions provided another avenue of interaction among meeting faculty
and participants. Six separate scientific sessions were held, and the respective
sessions covered lung carcinoma, gastrointestinal cancer, breast malignancy, novel
therapies/new combinations, other tumor types, as well as highlights from the 39th
annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. In addition to
stimulating research, another purpose of these workshops is developing enduring
material for wider distribution to those who did not attend this workshop. In this
combined volume, selected presentations from the various sessions are included.
Lung Cancer Treatment Options
Overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is frequently present in lung
cancer, and it may play a significant role in carcinogenesis, invasion, and metastasis.
Moreover, it is associated with shortened survival in early-stage adenocarcinoma.
Elizabeth Gore presents the rationale for COX-2 inhibitors in lung cancer and
presents data from a phase II study of concurrent celecoxib(Drug information on celecoxib) (Celebrex) and thoracic
irradiation in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). William Read et
al present a phase II trial of the combination of irinotecan and carboplatin(Drug information on carboplatin) (Paraplatin)
in NSCLC. It is thought that carboplatin is better tolerated than and equally
efficacious as cisplatin(Drug information on cisplatin) in this arena.
Gastrointestinal Cancer
In esophageal cancer, the limited efficacy and toxicity of conventional fluorouracil(Drug information on fluorouracil)
(5-FU)/cisplatin-based chemotherapy has prompted the evaluation of newer
agents and combinations. Ramaswamy Govindan et al present a phase II study of
cisplatin, 5-FU, celecoxib, and radiation therapy in patients with resectable
disease. David Ilson presents data from a multicenter phase II trial of weekly
irinotecan and cisplatin in advanced esophageal cancer.
The combination of irinotecan with 5-FU/leucovorin (IFL) has consistently
improved survival and response rates in comparison to 5-FU/leucovorin alone in
patients with colorectal cancer. Continuing efforts to improve its toxicity profile,
while retaining or improving upon the therapeutic outcomes, are ongoing. Jimmy
Hwang reviews the various combinations of irinotecan with 5-FU/leucovorin,
and discusses data from his group's efforts to improve the therapeutic index of
weekly IFL by incorporating a break after the second week of therapy, prior to
resuming IFL.
Targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in colorectal cancer is
another important therapeutic tool, and a monoclonal antibody against the extracellular
domain of EGFR (cetuximab [Erbitux]) has recently been approved for
the treatment of EGFR-positive metastatic disease refractory to irinotecan-based
therapy. Jeffrey Meyerhardt et al discuss the role of targeted agents against EGFR,
including other monoclonal antibodies as well as inhibitors of the intracellular
tyrosine kinase domain.
Weijing Sun and coworkers present data from phase I combined-modality
studies of concurrent radiation therapy with continuous infusion 5-FU and epirubicin(Drug information on epirubicin)
(Ellence) with either cisplatin or irinotecan for locally advanced upper
gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma.
Allan Lipton et al describe data from a trial that investigated whether the
addition of a COX-2 inhibitor to chemotherapy was beneficial in patients with
unresectable pancreatic cancer, a malignancy with few therapeutic options and a
dismal prognosis. (COX-2 expression is increased in most human pancreatic
cancers.) Patients received gemcitabine (Gemzar), irinotecan, and celecoxib,
and achieved pain relief, improvement in performance status, and decreases in
CA 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen levels.
Carlos Becerra concludes the gastrointestinal section with data from a phase I
study with irinotecan, epirubicin, and the novel agent capecitabine(Drug information on capecitabine) in patients with
metastatic adenocarcinomas. He reports the tolerability and efficacy of the regimen,
without pharmacokinetic interaction.
Combined-Modality Therapy in Rectal Cancer
The two conventional treatments for clinically resectable rectal cancer are
surgery followed by postoperative combined-modality therapy (T3 and/or N1/2
tumors) and preoperative combined-modality therapy followed by surgery and
postoperative chemotherapy (ultrasound T3 or clinical T4). Bruce Minsky reviews
phase I/II trials investigating new chemotherapeutic agents in combination
with pelvic radiation therapy, especially in the preoperative setting, and points
out the considerable interest in integrating irinotecan into preoperative combined-
modality therapy regimens. Based on these data, the recommended regimen
for patients who receive irinotecan-based combined-modality therapy is
continuous infusion 5-FU, irinotecan, and pelvic radiation.
Breast Cancer Treatment Approaches
Adjuvant chemotherapy is beneficial in patients with breast cancer, with
anthracycline-containing regimens being more effective than non-anthracyclinecontaining
ones. Jacques Bonneterre presents a follow-up analysis of the French
Adjuvant Study Group trial comparing FEC100 and FEC50 (5-FU/epirubicin/ cyclophosphamide(Drug information on cyclophosphamide) [Cytoxan, Neosar]) in patients with node-positive breast cancer.
After a median follow-up of 10 years, the benefit/risk ratio of the FEC100 regimen
in patients with positive axillary nodes was strongly positive, and a cost analysis
showed that the relatively low cost per year of life saved was around 1,000 euros.
Michael Untch et al report cardiotoxicity and efficacy data from a multicenter
phase II study of the combination of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide plus a humanized
monoclonal antibody specific for HER2/neu (trastuzumab [Herceptin]) in
breast cancer treatment.
Conclusion
In conclusion, I believe that the data presented at the University of Texas M. D.
Anderson Cancer Center Investigators' Workshop provided new insights and perspectives,
trends, and practices in various areas of oncology. I hope the reader will
find the information presented herein to be relevant, stimulating, and useful in
designing new trials.
