The stated aim of Seo's article is
to focus on the diagnosis and
management of infections that
can occur in patients with lung cancer.
Most of the studies of infections in cancer patients over the past 4 decades
have dealt predominantly with
opportunistic infections in immunocompromised
individuals who have
lymphoproliferative malignancies.
Less attention has been given to infections
associated with solid tumors,
so a comprehensive review of the
problem in patients with lung cancer
is greatly needed.
Unfortunately, the number of detailed and controlled studies specifically
addressing infectious complications
in lung cancer patients is limited.
The author reviews the relevant studies
reported over the past 20 years.
Furthermore, she utilizes information
and experience gained from studies
of patients with lymphoproliferative
malignancies, AIDS, and other immunocompromised
hosts.
The comments and recommendations made in this review represent a
reasonable approach to the management
of infections in patients with
lung cancer. Many of the recommendations
for treatment parallel the cited
guidelines prepared by expert
panels of the Infectious Diseases Society
of America, including those for
community-acquired pneumonia in
adults (Seo's reference 33), candidiasis
(reference 24), and antimicrobial
agents in neutropenic patients with
cancer (reference 19), reflecting a
consensus of infectious diseases
specialists.
Studies of Infections
in Lung Cancer
A couple of recent studies dealing
specifically with infections in lung
cancer patients are of interest and expand
the perspective of Seo's work.
Insight into the cause and timing
of postoperative infections comes
from a prospective study of 194 patients
operated on for lung cancer.
Sok et al[1] sought to identify pathogens
by the use of intraoperative swabs
and sputum samples for cultures taken
before, during, and 3 days after the
surgery. Documented infections occurred
in 34 patients-32 were classified
as pleuropulmonary and 2 were
from wounds. Approximately 75% of
the infections were caused by gramnegative
bacteria and Candida albicans.
The postoperative sputum
specimens were most predictive of
the cause of the infection (P < .01),
suggesting that organisms that cause
pleuropulmonary infections are probably acquired postoperatively from the
patient's oral cavity and upper respiratory
tract.
An interesting observation on the
association of Pneumocystis carinii
infection and small-cell carcinoma of
the lung was reported by de la Horra
et al[2] in 2004. Using a polymerase
chain reaction assay to identify the
presence of P carinii DNA, they examined
lung tissue sections from 10
cases of small-cell lung cancer
(SCLC), 10 cases of non-small-cell
lung cancer (NSCLC), 5 cases with
normal lungs, and 2 cases of P carinii
pneumonia. P carinii DNA was found
in all cases of SCLC, in 2 of 10
NSCLC cases, 2 of 2 P carinii pneumonia
cases, and none of the 5 control
cases, suggesting an association
between subclinical P carinii infection
and SCLC. No standard guidelines
have been established for the
use of chemoprophylaxis for P carinii
pneumonia in patients with lung
cancer.
Drug Dosage
One troublesome point on therapy
is the dose of trimethoprim(Drug information on trimethoprim) (TMP)- sulfamethoxazole(Drug information on sulfamethoxazole) (SMZ) that Seo recommends
for the treatment of P carinii
(use of the term "Pneumocystis jiroveci"
is controversial[3]) pneumonia.
The author gives a dose based on 15 to
20 mg TMP per kg per day (plus 75 to
100 mg SMZ per kg per day). It should
be noted that this is the dose for children,
whereas the doses of all other
drugs in the article are for adults. This
is a mistake sometimes made in practice
resulting in a significant overdosage
that may be associated with adverse
effects. The problem stems from the
fact that the original studies of TMPSMZ
for the treatment of P carinii pneumonia that led to Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) approval were done
in children, so the leaflet insert gave
the dosage based on body weight.
Calculation of adult doses from pediatric
doses based on body weight may
be hazardous. For example, the dose
for a 70-kg man recommended in this
paper would be 1,050 to 1,400 mg
TMP and 5,250 to 7,000 mg SMZ per
day. The current FDA-approved dose
for the treatment of P carinii pneumonia
in adults is 320 mg TMP and
1,600 mg SMZ per day. Thus, the
dose mentioned in Seo's article is three
to four times the appropriate dose and
may be associated with adverse effects.
The doses of pentamidine, based
on body weight, and trimetrexateleucovorin,
based on body surface
area, are satisfactory because they are
based on studies done in adults using
body size for dose determination.
Conclusion
Dr. Seo discusses standard approaches
to the diagnosis and management
of the infections generally
encountered in patients with cancer.
Further research is needed to focus on
infections unique to the patient with
lung cancer.
