Carter et al provide a nice summary
of current knowledge of
sexual dysfunction in and rehabilitation
of women with invasive
cervical cancer. The prevailing perspective
of their review, however,
seems to be that most women treated
for cervical cancer are white, middleclass
patients at major cancer centers.
In order to make a difference in the
quality of life of the majority of cervical
cancer survivors, we have to understand
who they are and recognize
the impact of social and gender inequality
on their lives and relationships
Cervical Cancer and
Socioeconomic Status
The authors cite the decline of cervical
cancer from first to third most
common reproductive tract malignancy
in the United States, but fail to
mention that 78% of cervical cancers
occur in developing nations, where
the malignancy remains the second
most frequent cause of cancer
death.[1] A recent meta-analysis of
57 case-control studies found a 100%
worldwide increase in risk of cervical
cancer among women of low vs high
social class.[2] This relationship was
especially strong in countries with low
to middle incomes, and in the United
States, where disparities in medical care greatly exceed those in other
wealthy nations. In the United States,
the incidence of cervical cancer in
women over age 40 is substantially
higher among African-American[3]
and Hispanic[4] women than among
non-Hispanic white women.
The association between cervical
cancer and socioeconomic status reflects
lifestyle factors as well as access
to cytologic screening. Because
of the importance of the human papilloma virus
(HPV) in the initiation of
cervical cancer, elevated risks have
consistently been seen in women who,
over a lifetime, have more sexual partners.[
5] Yet in many cultures that allow
men to have multiple partners but
strictly enforce female chastity and
fidelity, a woman's risk of cervical
cancer may depend on her husband's
sexual history, including his lifetime
number of sexual partners, whether
he frequents prostitutes, and whether
he is circumcised.[6]
Along with exposure to HPV, a
woman's risk of invasive cervical cancer
is related to her use of tobacco
and the health of her immune system.
Women who are positive for the human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
are at higher risk of cervical dysplasia
and cancer. Once a woman develops
dysplasia, however, the most crucial
factor in progression to invasive cervical
cancer is lack of screening for
and treatment of precursor lesions.[7]
Cultural Influences
Sexual rehabilitation after cervical
cancer presents a special challenge
because the women most at risk for
this malignancy often have less knowledge
about female sexual function,
less access to information or counseling,
and less control over their sex
lives and relationships. Even in the
United States, women with a college
degree have half the rate of sexual
problems reported by women who do
not finish high school.[8]
The article by Carter et al notes
that a woman's negative sexual selfconcept
influences her functioning
after cancer. Many cervical cancer
survivors do not have the luxury of
worrying about their body image or
self-concept. If they are not able to satisfy their husbands sexually, they
may be physically abused or abandoned.
Furthermore, even for women
in more loving and egalitarian relationships,
having less education or
being part of a minority subculture in
the United States is associated with
more conservative values about sexuality.
The traditions of privacy and
silence associated with women's sexuality
in Hispanic, Asian, and more
rural African-American families
present a challenge to even the most
empathic and dedicated clinician in
trying to provide information and
counseling.
For years, those of us who work
with sexuality and cancer have been
lobbying for specialty clinics in cancer
centers and training for nurse clinicians
and social workers who could
provide sexual counseling when the
oncologist is too busy and overwhelmed,
or at least referrals to a network
of specialty providers outside
the hospital-all suggestions made by
Carter et al. None of these strategies,
however, is likely to reach most women
treated for cervical cancer.
Peer Counseling
Sexual rehabilitation may have the
best chance to benefit poor women if
programs reach out into the community,
partnering with influential organizations
from particular ethnic or
religious groups. My research team
recently developed a peer counseling
program in reproductive health for African-
American breast cancer survivors
in partnership with Sisters
Network, Inc, a national advocacy organization.
We created a workbook
with three chapters, including one that
focuses on sexuality. Keeping the reading
level as basic as possible, and using
African-American-themed clip
art, the chapter presents information
on genital anatomy and sexual response,
the impact of cancer treatment
on sexual function, sexual communication
with a partner, how to approach
dating for single women, how to use
vaginal lubricants and control the muscles
surrounding the vaginal opening
to minimize pain during sex, and how
to enhance sexual desire, which is often
reduced after cancer treatment.
Three peer counselors went
through an intensive training period,
and then met with each participant for
three sessions. Preliminary results suggest
that women in the program did
improve their sexual function and satisfaction.
We are embarking on a larger,
randomized trial of effectiveness.
This same model would work well
for cervical cancer survivors. We
found that the privacy of one-on-one
meetings allowed participants to disclose
sexual problems that were not
being discussed in the support groups
offered by the local chapters of Sisters
Network, Inc.
A peer counseling program can also
overcome barriers to sexual counseling
such as stigmatization of seeing a
mental health professional, lack of insurance
coverage, lack of transportation
or child care, and lack of trained,
mental health professionals who are
familiar with both sexual and cancer
counseling.
Conclusions
Peer counseling is not the only innovative
model for offering sexual
rehabilitation. Use of the Internet and
multimedia presentation of information
are also useful with low-income
women, whose literacy may be
limited.[9] If we are to make a difference
for this most vulnerable group
of cancer survivors, we need to look
beyond our traditional treatment settings,
our traditional treatment programs,
and our traditional complaints
about the low priority that cancer
treatment centers place on sexual
rehabilitation.
