The surgical management of cutaneous
melanoma remains
controversial in part because
there is no consensus regarding the
margins of excision for the primary
tumor or the therapeutic benefit of
removing clinically normal appearing
regional lymph nodes (elective
lymph node dissection).[1] Intraoperative
lymphatic mapping with sentinel
lymph node dissection has
revolutionized the management of regional
lymph nodes by allowing the
surgeon to perform a minimally invasive
procedure instead of elective
lymph node dissection, and by allowing
the pathologist to focus on one or
two lymph nodes rather than all the
nodes in a complete lymph node dissection
specimen.[2]
Intraoperative mapping is performed
by preoperative cutaneous
lymphoscintigraphy; intraoperative
identification of the sentinel lymph
node relies on residual radioactivity
from lymphoscintigraphy or on coinjection
of a radiopharmaceutical with
a vital blue dye.[3] Long-term experience
suggests that lymphatic mapping
by a multidisciplinary team composed
of a nuclear medicine physician, surgeon,
and pathologist can be performed
after a short learning period.[4]
Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection
The tumor status of the sentinel
lymph node is prognostically important;
patients with a tumor-positive
sentinel node have a significantly
worse survival than do those with tumor-
negative dissections. The tumor
status of the sentinel node supersedes
all other prognostic features of the
primary.[5] Recurrences are rare in
lymphatic basins that contain tumornegative
sentinel nodes, suggesting the
high accuracy of the technique.
However, because the therapeutic
benefit of identifying metastatic disease
at an early stage has not been
proven, surgeons struggle to determine
which patients with positive sentinel
nodes should undergo complete
lymph node dissection. Most patients
with positive sentinel nodes will have
no other involved nodes. Should these
patients still undergo completion dissection?
Complicating the question is
the equivocal role of adjuvant therapy
with high-dose interferon, its associated
toxicity, and the failure of other
experimental regimens to show a significant
impact on survival.[6,7]
Contemporary Melanoma
Management Strategies
In this issue of ONCOLOGY, Bisseck
and associates from Wake Forest
University describe the management
of a 4-year-old boy with a Clark level
IV, 5-mm ulcerated melanoma on the
right cheek. After a staging work-up,
the patient underwent wide excision
of the melanoma with sentinel lymphadenectomy
of a cervical lymph
node and delayed completion lymph
node dissection. A single positive sentinel
node was obtained from the right
neck dissection.
This case illustrates contemporary
management strategies for cutaneous
melanoma-a disease that rarely occurs
in childhood. Most modern medical
literature suggests that the natural
history of melanoma in children is
similar to that of adults, but too few
pediatric cases are reported in the literature
to gain meaningful insight into
this disease in children. We, as clinicians,
are forced to extrapolate therapeutic
options for children from the
adult experience.[8,9]
Children are typically diagnosed
with thick primaries, as in this case,
because the differential diagnosis of a
pigmented skin in children rarely includes
melanoma.[10,11] Unfortunately,
patients with thick (> 4 mm)
primary melanoma may already have
subclinical distant metastases at the
time of diagnosis. Computed tomography
scans or whole-body positronemission
tomography scans can reveal
subcentimeter tumor foci but are less
likely to identify metastases smaller
than a few millimeters in size.
Sentinel lymphadenectomy is the
only useful guide for surgeons to identify
microscopic metastases, and thus,
has become an important staging tool.
It is possible that pediatric patients
with thick primary melanomas can
benefit from sentinel lymphadenectomy,
as most adult patients with a single
positive sentinel node will achieve
long-term survival.[12,13] Yet many
patients will die from recurrent melanoma.
The long-term survival of the
child in this case is unknown. Traditional
techniques of following patients
with serial blood work and radiographic
studies have never been shown to
prospectively predict recurrence.
Conclusions
Perhaps through the development
of newer molecular-based approaches
for screening serum and tumor
specimens, the outcome of patients
with a single-tumor-positive sentinel
node will be better understood. Meanwhile,
improved public awareness and
education should be used to diagnose
these lesions at an early stage and,
potentially, to decrease the incidence
of skin cancers in all age groups.[14]
