Biomedical research is in the
midst of unprecedented transformation
stemming from the
overall impact of molecular biology
on medical research, including the
emerging high-throughput genomicsbased
technologies. These new paradigms
are leading to better definition
of the disease state as well as more
precise and less toxic therapeutic strategies.
But even as we begin to understand
the implications of gene-based
information on the genesis, pathophysiology,
and progression of disease and
on the development of novel therapeutic
approaches, the dawn of the
era of proteomics is heralding even
more radical changes.
Drs. Ornstein and Petricoin have produced
a concise yet excellent review of
currently existing proteomics technologies
that aim to define and characterize
the various proteins and peptides
associated with biologic processes and/
or disease states. These new proteomics
technologies hold promise for providing
disease biomarkers, including
cancer markers that would be valuable
to both patients and clinicians.
Proteomic Analytic Tools
The authors discuss both classical
and emerging gel-based proteomic
analytic tools such as two-dimensional
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
(2D-PAGE) and digital in-gel electrophoresis
(DIGE). Although improvements
such as immobilized pH
gradients, image analysis software,
and better fluorescent-based dyes have
improved reproducibility, 2D-PAGE
remains a comparatively low-throughput
method of proteome interrogation
requiring a relatively large amount of
biologic sample when clinical assay
development is concerned.[1]
The importance and limitations of
relatively novel technologies such as
isotope-coded affinity tagging, laser
capture microdissection, tissue microarrays,
and reverse phase protein
arrays are also adequately discussed.
Protein-based arrays have a clear advantage
over cDNA arrays in that the
latter cannot address the various features
of protein alterations and posttranslational
modifications that occcur
during the disease process. However,
the dynamic range exhibited by the human
proteome presents an equally formidable
challenge for arrays that rely
on traditional antibody-staining protocols.[
1] The limitation of antibody
specificity has sparked the development
of novel arrays employing new
classes of protein-capture agents that
include aptamers,[2] ribozymes,[3]
modified binding proteins, and partial-
molecule imprints.[4]
Role of Mass Spectrometry
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics
is providing the impetus for advancement
and is proving to be an
indispensable tool for molecular and
cellular protein studies, making it the
method of choice for analyzing complex
biologic samples.[5] The constant
invention of higher platforms of mass
spectrometers exhibiting an exponential
increase in dynamic range and
resolution further increases the functionality
of this technology, not only in
discovery but in translational research.
Aside from the utility illustrated
in the article by Ornstein and Petricoin,
other mass spectrometry-based
concepts are being developed. For
example, mass spectrometric tissue
imaging[6] employs tissue sections
subjected to matrix-assisted laser desorption/
ionization (MALDI), and the
diagnostic protein profiles contained
in the tissue sections are generated
by "imaging" the sample with an array
of mass spectra.
The authors have emphasized the
utility of surface-enhanced laser
desorption/ionization time-of-flight
(SELDI-TOF) mass spectrometry using
Ciphergen's ProteinChip Biology
System II (with its ProteinChip Reader)
and Applied Biosystems' QSTAR
Pulsar LC/MS/MS System. The diagnostic
utility of this technology in recognizing
the serum protein patterns
diagnostic of ovarian cancer or prostate
cancer has been highlighted.[7-10]
Although mass spectrometry equipment
has the potential to provide desirable
diagnostic biomarkers, the cost and level
of expertise required to perform the
spectrometric analysis is of concern.
The high dimensionality of data generated
from proteomic investigations
requires powerful bioinformatics tools
to uncover biomarkers and hidden patterns
that are characteristic of the disease
state. Genetic algorithms, self-organized
cluster analysis, and decision tree
algorithms described by the authors
represent some of the analytic tools
employed. Artificial neural networks[
11-12] and discrete wavelet
transform data reduction[13] are other
methods currently under investigation.
Recent successes have emphasized the
importance of bioinformatics. However,
key issues affecting data analysis,
such as biologic variability,
consideration of preanalytic variables,
and analytic reproducibility, need to
be addressed.[14]
Conclusions
The issues surrounding both the
promising potential and evident limitations
of proteomics and its medical
applications are testaments to the developmental
stage of this emerging
technology. Investigators in cancer
research or other disease-focused research
will increasingly need to rely
on technologic advancements in genomics
and proteomics to achieve
their goals; ie, discovering the pathways
that lead to malignancy and taking
advantage of gene or protein
targets for diagnosis, prognostication,
therapy, or prevention of disease. The
further development of the proteomic
innovations discussed here and the
invention of novel ones will certainly
prove beneficial in overcoming present
limitations and hopefully will provide
robust, practical platforms for the clinical
setting.
