ONCOLOGY.
No. 7
The McTiernan Article Reviewed
Obesity and Cancer: The Risks, Science, and Potential Management Strategies
By ROWAN CHLEBOWSKI, MD, PhD
Chief, Medical Oncology/
Hematology
MICHELLE GELLER, MD
Assistant Professor of Medicine
Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
Torrance, California |
June 1, 2005
Anne McTiernan has provided
a comprehensive and balanced
review of a complex topic,
namely, "Obesity and Cancer: The
Risks, Science, and Potential Management
Strategies." The impressive
weight of assembled evidence from the
cited observational studies has been sufficient
to influence several cancer organizations,
including the American
Cancer Society and the American Institute
for Cancer Prevention, to issue
recommendations regarding nutrition
and physical activity in relationship to
cancer.[1,2] However, clinical practice
is unlikely to undergo substantial
change in the absence of prospective
trials demonstrating benefit on clinical
outcomes.[3] For at least the breast cancer
and obesity question, information
from phase III randomized, prospective
clinical trials evaluating lifestyle
intervention influence on clinical outcome
are anticipated in the near future.
There are currently no full-scale
studies evaluating weight loss as related
to either breast cancer incidence or
recurrence. However, women who are
obese are more likely to have higher
dietary fat intake and lower physical
activity when compared to nonobese
women. In addition, in at least some
observational reports, all three factors
(obesity, higher fat intake, and lower
physical activity) have been related to
breast cancer outcome.[4-7] There are
several randomized clinical trials currently
evaluating dietary lifestyle inter-
ventions that incorporate fat-intake reduction,
and in some cases, other nutrients,
to begin to address the potential
role of lifestyle change on breast cancer
outcomes.[8-11] These trials will
directly address the contribution of dietary
fat intake to breast cancer outcome;
at least two of these studies will
report on clinical end points this year.
The WINS Study
The Women's Intervention Nutrition
Study (WINS) has entered 2,400
women 48 years of age or older with
early-stage, resected breast cancer.
The women have been randomized to
either control or dietary intervention
groups, with the latter designed to result
in dietary fat-intake reduction.[12]
All hormone receptor-positive patients
received tamoxifen(Drug information on tamoxifen); protocoldefined
chemotherapy is required for
receptor-negative patients, while chemotherapy
is optional for those with
receptor-positive disease. Counseling
on weight loss is not an intervention
target. Adherence to the intervention
has been presented.[9]
Clinical outcome results after about
5 years of median follow-up are anticipated
for mid-2005. The major study
end point, similar to adjuvant chemotherapy
or hormonal therapy trials, is
relapse-free survival including breast
cancer recurrence and contralateral
breast cancer development.
The Women's Health Initiative
Dietary Modification Trial
The dietary modification trial of
the Women's Health Initiative is also
a randomized, prospective multicenter
clinical trial evaluating a lifestyle
intervention vs a control condition.[
11,13] The dietary intervention
is a low-fat dietary pattern that is high
in fruits, vegetables, and grains, hypothesized
to reduce the risk of breast
and colorectal cancer, and secondarily
coronary heart disease, in otherwise
healthy postmenopausal women.
Accrual has been completed, with
48,836 postmenopausal women randomized
and undergoing follow-up.
Intermediate dietary adherence has
been described.[14] By study design,
outcomes will be evaluated and results
presented following 8.5 years of
follow-up later in 2005.
The results from these two studies,
separately evaluating the effect of dietary
fat intake on breast cancer recurrence
and breast cancer incidence,
may provide the first definitive evidence
sufficient to move lifestyle intervention
strategies into active
clinical practice.
ANNE MCTIERNAN, MD, PhD
1. Brown JK, Doyle C, Coumeya KS, et al:
Nutrition and physical activity during and after
cancer treatment: An American Cancer Society
guide for informed choices. CA Cancer J
Clin 53:268-291, 2003.
2. Cerhan JR, Potter JD, Gilmore JM, et al:
Adherence to the AICR cancer prevention recommendations
and subsequent morbidity and
mortality in the Iowa Women's Health Study
cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
13:1114-1120, 2004.
3. Chlebowski R: The American Cancer Society
Guide for Nutrition and Physical Activity for
Cancer Survivors: A call to action for clinical investigators.
Cancer J Clin 53:266-267, 2003.
4. Jain M, Miller AB, To T: Premorbid diet
and the prognosis of women with breast cancer.
J Natl Cancer Inst 86:1390-1397, 1994.
5. Zhang, Folsom AR, Sellers TA, et al: Better
breast cancer survival for postmenopausal
women who are less overweight and eat less
fat: The Iowa Women's Health Study. Cancer
76:275-283, 1995.
6. Kroenke CH, Chen WY, Rosner B, et al:
Weight, weight gain, and survival after breast
cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol 23:1370-1378,
2005.
7. Enger SM, Greif JM, Polikoff J, et al: Body
weight correlates with mortality in early stage
breast cancer. Arch Surg 139:954-960, 2004.
8. Boyd NF, Greenberg C, Lockwood G, et
al: Effects of two years of a low-fat high-carbohydrate
diet on radiologic features of the
breast: Results from a randomized trial. Canadian
Diet and Breast Cancer Prevention Study
Group. J Natl Cancer Inst 89:488-496, 1997.
9. Chlebowski RT, Blackburn GL, Winters
B, et al: Long term adherence to dietary fat reduction
in the Women's Intervention Nutrition
Study (WINS) (abstract 302). Proc Am Soc Clin
Oncol 19:78a, 2000.
10. Pierce JP, Faerber S, Wright FA, et al,
for the Women's Healthy Eating and Living
(WHEL) study group: A randomized trial of the
effect of a plant-based dietary pattern on additional
breast cancer events and survival: The
Women's Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL)
study. Control Clin Trials 23:728-756, 2002.
11. Ritenbaugh C, Patterson RE, Chlebowski
RT, et al: The Women's Health Initiative Dietary
Modification trial: Overview and baseline
characteristics of participants. Ann Epidemiol
13:S87-S97, 2003.
12. Chlebowski RT, Blackburn GL, Buzzard
IM, et al: Adherence to a dietary fat intake reduction
program in postmenopausal women receiving
therapy for early breast cancer. J Clin
Oncol 11:2072-2080, 1993.
13. Women's Health Initiative Study Group:
Dietary adherence in the Women's Health Initiative
Dietary Modification Trial. J Am Diet Assoc
104:654-658, 2004.
14. Patterson RE, Kristal A, Rodabough R, et
al: Changes in food sources of dietary fat in response
to an intensive low-fat dietary intervention:
Early results from the Women's Health Initiative. J
Am Diet Assoc 103:454-460, 2003.
|
|
Cancer Types
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supportive Care
|
More Topics
|
|
|
|
All Topics 
Lower Back Pain in an Elderly Man With a History of Localized Prostate Cancer
James B. Yu, MD1
, May 17, 2013
A 70-year-old man with a history of localized prostate cancer treated with whole-pelvis radiation therapy with a boost to the prostate, in conjunction with androgen deprivation therapy 7 years prior, presented with lower back pain. A bone scan revealed an area of activity in the sacrum. What is the most likely diagnosis?
Five Steps to Improving Patient Access Judy Capko, May 21, 2013 Patient access is getting increased attention through reform initiatives. Here are five steps you can take to make sure patients get appropriate access to care in your office.
|