In this issue of ONCOLOGY, Sonoda
provides a systematic review
of the management of early ovarian
cancer. The author rightfully concludes
that comprehensive surgical
staging should be performed in these
patients and that, based on several
European randomized studies, patients
with high-risk early ovarian cancer
should be treated with adjuvant platinum-
based chemotherapy. Important
questions remain, however, including:
How should high-risk early ovarian
cancer be defined? and Is there a need
for adjuvant chemotherapy in patients
who have undergone comprehensive
surgical staging?
Reclassifying Early
Ovarian Cancer
The term "early ovarian cancer" is
used to describe disease confined to
one or both ovaries (International Federation
of Gynecology and Obstetrics
[FIGO] stage I) or limited in spread
to the true pelvis (FIGO stage II).
Because most patients with FIGO
stage II disease are surgically and
medically treated in the same manner
as advanced ovarian cancer patients,
we will focus here on stage I disease.
The largest study[1] of prognostic factors
in stage I disease (N = 1,545) confirmed
earlier studies, that degree of
differentiation is the most important
independent prognostic factor in
stage I disease. Hence, it seems indicated
to include the degree of differentiation
in the FIGO classification
and clinical decision-making. Furthermore,
it has been shown that
FIGO stage Ic disease has a similar
prognosis as stage Ib.[1,2] It is, therefore,
time for a new FIGO classification
that takes into account these
findings.
Table 1 offers a revised classification
for low (Ia), intermediate (Ib), and
high-risk (Ic) early ovarian cancer. In
the future, newer prognostic factors
such as DNA ploidy or other biologic
markers analyzed with immunohistochemistry
or newer techniques
such as microarrays or proteomic analysis will probably replace the
clinical prognostic variables used in
this classification.
ACTION and ICON1 Trials
The combined analysis of the European
Organization for Research and
Treatment of Cancer's Adjuvant Chemotherapy
in Ovarian Neoplasms
(ACTION) trial and the International
Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm
(ICON1) trial showed for the first time
that adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy
improves overall survival in
early ovarian cancer compared with
observation.[3] Because other regimens,
including taxanes, were not
studied in comparison with a no-treatment
arm, it is probably appropriate
to extrapolate from the experience in advanced ovarian carcinoma that the
addition of paclitaxel(Drug information on paclitaxel) to carboplatin(Drug information on carboplatin)
(Paraplatin) is warranted in high-risk
stage I ovarian carcinoma.
Comprehensive surgical staging
(including blind biopsies of, for example,
diaphragm and paracolic gutters,
omentectomy, and para-aortic and
pelvic lymphadenectomy) has resulted
in upstaging of about one-third of the
patients believed to have stage I disease.
In a subgroup analysis of the
ACTION trial, no difference in overall
survival was observed between the
observation and adjuvant platin chemotherapy
groups. However, final
conclusions cannot be drawn from this
subgroup analysis of the ACTION trial
due to the low number of events.
Ideally, a new randomized study
that compares restaging with adjuvant
chemotherapy in nonoptimally surgically
staged patients should be performed.
However, such a study does
not seem feasible given the low number
of recurrences among optimally
surgically staged patients, the low incidence
of stage I ovarian carcinoma,
and the fact that combined analysis of
the ICON1 and ACTION trials showed
a benefit for adjuvant platinum-based
chemotherapy. Hence, comprehensive
surgical staging and adjuvant platinum-
based chemotherapy is currently
indicated for all patients with high- or
intermediate-risk stage I invasive epithelial
ovarian carcinoma who are fit
enough to undergo such treatment.
