CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home »

ONCOLOGY. Vol. 20 No. 8 6
Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

The Role of Intravenous Ironin Cancer-Related Anemia

By David H. Henry, MD1 | July 1, 2006
1 Clinical Professor of Medicine, Vice Chairman, Department of Medicine, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

ABSTRACT: Patients with cancer may have an absolute or functional iron deficiency as a result of their disease or its treatment. These conditions can lead to an insufficient supply of iron for incorporation into erythrocytes during supportive care with erythropoiesis-stimulating proteins for chemotherapy. The use of supplemental iron therapy is well established in patients with chronic kidney disease and anemia, but less well studied in the oncology/hematology setting. Furthermore, the use of oral iron formulations in patients with cancer and anemia is limited by poor absorption in the duodenum, arduous dosing requirements (three times a day), and a high likelihood of gastrointestinal side effects. Two recent studies have shown that intravenous (IV) iron (iron dextran(Drug information on dextran) or ferric gluconate) increases the hematopoietic response rates in cancer patients who were receiving chemotherapy and treated with epoetin alfa(Drug information on epoetin alfa) (Procrit) for anemia. The effects on hemoglobin levels and measures of iron metabolism were notably greater with IV iron formulations than with oral iron formulations. The results from several ongoing trials of IV iron in patients treated with epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa(Drug information on darbepoetin alfa) (Aranesp) for chemotherapy-induced anemia should lead to a greater understanding of the role of IV iron supplementation in improving the hematopoietic responses in these patients.

Anemia is a common complication of cancer and its treatment, and can be attributed to several factors, the most evident being the myelosuppressive effects of chemotherapy[1] and the immunosuppressive effects of chronic disease.[2] The anemia of chronic disease in cancer is mediated by the emergence of malignant cells that induce the expression of a variety of proinflammatory cytokines from immune cells. The consequences of this inflammatory state include insufficient production of erythropoietin(Drug information on erythropoietin) by the kidneys, a blunted response to erythropoietin that leads to inhibition of erythropoiesis, impaired proliferation of erythroid progenitor cells, and dysregulation of iron homeostasis (reviewed by Weiss and Goodnough).[2] In addition, direct effects of chemotherapeutics, particularly platinum compounds, on the kidneys can also lead to a decrease in the production of erythropoietin. These factors all contribute to lower hemoglobin (Hgb) levels and, consequently, impair quality of life in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy.

Current management of chemotherapy-induced anemia centers on therapeutic erythropoiesis-stimulating proteins (ESPs) such as recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin alfa [Procrit]) and the novel long-acting ESP darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp). Epoetin alfa has been shown to increase Hgb levels in patients with cancer treated with chemotherapy, with associated reductions in the need for red blood cell transfusions and improvements in quality of life.[3-9] Likewise, darbepoetin alfa alleviates chemotherapy-induced anemia and improves quality of life in patients with cancer, with the additional benefit of making a reduced dosing schedule possible.[10-15] The responses to therapy with ESPs are inadequate, however, in approximately one-third of patients with cancer and anemia who undergo chemotherapy,[3-7,10-12] possibly owing to an insufficiency of iron for erythrocyte incorporation during the rapid induction of erythropoiesis stimulated by ESPs. Analysis of pretreatment laboratory values in patients who were being considered for treatment with epoetin alfa found that iron deficiency was a significant cause of their anemia, with 17% of patients having ferritin levels less than 100 ng/mL, 59% having transferrin saturation (TSAT) less than 20%, and 27% having content of reticulocyte Hgb less than 32 g/dL.[16] The use of supplemental iron is well established in patients with chronic kidney disease and anemia,[17] but its effectiveness in patients with cancer is less clear.

Dysregulation of Iron Metabolism in Anemia
Labile iron and iron stores are generally kept in dynamic equilibrium in the reticuloendothelial system. Developing erythrocytes in the bone marrow obtain iron from the pool of labile iron.[18] Anemia related to iron deficiency may result from a patient not having sufficient labile iron available for incorporation into erythrocytes despite having adequate iron stores (as in patients with anemia of chronic disease) or from a state of iron depletion within the iron stores (as in patients with an absolute iron deficiency).[2]

TABLE 1
Serum Markers of Iron Homeostasis in Anemia of Chronic Disease and Absolute Iron Deficiency

A number of markers of iron homeostasis can be used to differentiate between anemia of chronic disease and absolute iron deficiency (Table 1).[2,19-21] In a population of patients with anemia of any cause, a serum ferritin level of 100 ng/mL or less was the most sensitive and specific marker of iron deficiency. Total iron-binding capacity and TSAT were less able to differentiate between iron deficiency and iron sufficiency.[19] Furthermore, because serum ferritin levels reflect the stored iron component and soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) levels reflect the available iron component, the sTfR/log ferritin index makes it possible to differentiate iron deficiency into iron-depleted and iron-sufficient functional iron deficiency states. The correlation between this index and the hemoglobinization of red blood cells makes it possible to map the progression of iron deficiency.[20]

Iron Supplementation
The clinical practice guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend iron supplementation in patients with cancer when the ferritin levels are less than 100 ng/mL and TSAT is less than 20%.[22] The guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society of Hematology are less specific, noting the paucity of evidence for using iron supplementation in cancer-related anemia.[23] Oral iron supplementation is often used in patients with iron deficiency, but its effectiveness in patients receiving ESPs for chemotherapy-induced anemia is limited in that it does not provide iron rapidly enough for ESP-induced erythropoiesis.

Elevated levels of interleukin-6 and lipopolysaccharides as a consequence of inflammation lead to greater expression of the acute-phase protein hepcidin in the liver, which in turn decreases the intestinal absorption of iron.[24,25] To attempt to overcome this limited absorption, it may be necessary to give oral iron three times a day to produce sufficiently high serum levels, but this can be associated with adherence problems and gastrointestinal adverse effects and may still be ineffective because of inflammatory cytokines and hepcidin.

Parenteral iron may be an alternative to oral iron supplementation. Several intravenous (IV) formulations of iron have been developed: iron dextran(Drug information on iron dextran), iron sucrose, and ferric gluconate (reviewed in Silverstein and Rogers).[26] Iron dextran has been available for use in the United States for several decades, and iron sucrose and ferric gluconate have been approved only in the past few years. Iron dextran has a half-life of 5 to 20 hours, and the patient's total dose can be given in one infusion (total dose infusion [TDI]).[27] However, delayed reactions of arthralgia, backache, chills, dizziness, fever, headache, myalgia, malaise, and nausea and vomiting have been associated with TDI; therefore, it is recommended that patients be given a test dose before the total dose is administered.[27]

Iron sucrose and ferric gluconate are more readily available for erythropoiesis than iron dextran.[26] Iron sucrose has a half-life of 5 to 6 hours and is transferred directly to both the reticuloendothelial system and transferrin,[28,29] while ferric gluconate has a half-life of approximately 1 hour and is transferred directly to the reticuloendothelial system, after which a bioactive form is released for binding to transferrin.[30] The rates of serious anaphylaxis hypersensitivity, hypersensitivity reactions, and adverse drug reactions are lower with iron sucrose and ferric gluconate than with iron dextran, and test doses are not required with these agents.[26]

Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
IMAGE IQ

Lower Back Pain in an Elderly Man With a History of Localized Prostate Cancer
James B. Yu, MD1 , May 17, 2013

A 70-year-old man with a history of localized prostate cancer treated with whole-pelvis radiation therapy with a boost to the prostate, in conjunction with androgen deprivation therapy 7 years prior, presented with lower back pain. A bone scan revealed an area of activity in the sacrum. What is the most likely diagnosis?

More Image IQs 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Primary Care Can't Thrive Without Nurse Practitioners
Courtney H. Lyder, ND,  May 17, 2013
With a projected shortfall of primary-care physicians, it's time for alternate solutions to patient care. Nurse practitioners are one logical remedy.
VWhat Physicians Can Learn from the Allscripts EHR Lawsuit
Marisa Torrieri,  May 16, 2013
Lawsuit prompts question: What should physicians do to ensure they end up with a great EHR instead of buyer’s remorse?
Eight Ways ICD-9 Will Still Matter to Medical Practices
Brenda Edwards, CPC,  May 15, 2013
What should your medical practice do with your ICD-9-CM book after October 1, 2014? Keep it.
Seven Ways Technology Can Speed Up Patient Collections
Cheyenne Brinson,  May 15, 2013
Failing to adopt widely available billing and collections technology can cost medical practices big. Here's how to do it right.
Four Reasons Private Medical Practice is Becoming Extinct
Carol Stryker,  May 15, 2013
It’s becoming increasingly difficult for private medical practices to thrive. Here’s what’s driving the trend toward consolidation.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Skin Lesions
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • New AUA Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Screening
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • Genomics Studies Identify Testicular Cancer Risk Variants
  • Lower Back Pain in an Elderly Man With a History of Localized Prostate Cancer
  • FDA Approves Erlotinib (Tarceva) as First-Line Lung Cancer Therapy for Certain Patients
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Financial Toxicity, Part II: How Can We Help With the Burden of Treatment-Related Costs?
  • Patient Quality of Life Endpoints in Oncology Trials, Part II
  • Who's Coding Whom?
  • “How Do I Say This Nicely? Your Oncologist Wasn't Following Guidelines”
  • Study: Cholesterol Drugs Reduced Risk of Prostate Cancer Death
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • ONS: Safe Handling of Chemotherapy
  • Financial Toxicity, Part II: How Can We Help With the Burden of Treatment-Related Costs?
  • Conflicts of Interest in Medicine: What About Ties to Payers?
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter



CancerNetwork on Facebook

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy