CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
 
CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
PATIENTS
NURSES
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home »

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 15 No. 10
Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Oophorectomy Value Varies by BRCA Type

October 1, 2006

ATLANTA—The risk reduction for breast and ovarian cancer associated with salpingo-oophorectomy (SO) in high-risk women varies according to the type of BRCA mutation, Noah D. Kauff, MD, of the Clinical Genetics Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, reported at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 42nd Annual Meeting (abstract 1003). "In the largest prospective follow-up study to date, risk-reducing surgery significantly reduced the risk of BRCA-associated gynecologic cancers in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers as well as breast cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers. . . . We need to stratify for BRCA mutation type in these two related but distinct cancer syndromes," Dr. Kauff said.

The study was undertaken, he said, because previous studies were limited by short follow-up or other methodological problems, and were not powered to examine differences in outcome between carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2.

The researchers updated and combined follow-up data from two large cohorts of BRCA carriers. Patients were prospectively followed for a minimum of 6 months, and 1,080 mutation carriers were initially eligible for study inclusion. After various exclusions, 871 patients were in the study cohort, enrolled from 11 centers (597 with breast tissue at risk). Dr. Kauff said that 546 of these women elected risk-reduction surgery a median of 5 months from receipt of BRCA test results.

During a mean follow-up of 40 months, among BRCA1 mutation carriers, the investigators observed 12 gynecologic cancers in 198 women electing surveillance (10 ovarian, 1 fallopian tube, 1 primary peritoneal), compared with 3 gynecologic cancers (all primary peritoneal) in 352 women electing risk-reduction SO. Among BRCA2 mutation carriers, there were 2 gynecologic cancers (both ovarian) in the surveillance group (n = 127) vs none in the surgery group (n = 194).

For BRCA1 and BRCA2 groups combined, SO was associated with an 89% reduction in risk of gynecologic cancer (P < .001). When stratified by mutation type, the risk reduction was 87% for BRCA1 mutation carriers (P = .002) and 100% for BRCA2 mutation carriers (see Table).

With a mean follow-up of 35 months, among BRCA1 mutation carriers, there were 19 breast cancers in the 178 patients who did not have surgery vs 15 in the 190 women who had SO. In BRCA2 mutation carriers, there were 9 breast cancers in the nonsurgery group (n = 116) vs 4 in the surgery group (n = 113).

Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

  • Bladder Cancer
  • Bone Metastases
  • Breast Cancer
  • CML
  • Colorectal Cancer
  • End-of-Life
  • GIST
  • Genetics Genomics
  • Gynecologic Cancers
  • Head & Neck Cancer
  • Integrative Oncology
  • Leukemia
  • Lung Cancer
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Nausea & Vomiting
  • Palliative Care
  • Pancreatic Cancer
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy
  • Prostate Cancer
  • RCC
  • Skin Cancer
  • Triple-Negative Breast
  • Testicular Cancer


More Topics 

 
PUBLICATIONS
ONCOLOGY Journal ONCOLOGY Nurse Edition Journal Cancer Management: A Multidisciplinary Approach

ONCOLOGY:
Perspectives on Best Practices

ONCOLOGY:
Nurse Edition

CANCER
MANAGEMENT
:
A Multidisciplinary
Approach


 
IMAGE IQ

This patient is at increased risk for which type of neoplasia?

A 28-year-old, slightly obese Caucasian woman presented with a long-standing history of intermittently painful “bumps” on both shoulders and her upper back.

 

More Image IQs:

 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Tax Schemes Every Physician Should Avoid
Ike Devji, JD, January 31, 2012
The next 60 days marks the final push to sell physicians across the United States tax plans of both good and questionable value.
Boosting Collections at Your Medical Practice: Whose Job Is It?
P.J. Cloud-Moulds, January 28, 2012
Embrace the relationship between your billing company and your medical practice staff.
Managing Difficult Medical Practice Employees
Shelly K. Schwartz, January 27, 2012
Tips for transforming immature staff members into great employees.
Prevent Physician Distraction When Using mHealth Technology
Aubrey Westgate, January 25, 2012
As more and more physicians use handheld mobile technology in their day-to-day work, some critics are raising concerns about “distracted doctoring.”
Can That Applicant Do the Job at Your Medical Practice?
Karen Zupko, January 25, 2012
If like many communities, yours has significant numbers of non-English speaking people with whom neither you nor your staff are able to converse, your practice is at a serious disadvantage.
 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Head and Neck Tumors
  • 46-Year-Old Woman Presents With Difficulty in Ambulation, and Swelling and Discoloration of Both Eyelids
  • Optimizing Outcomes of Advanced Prostate Cancer: Drug Sequencing and Novel Therapeutic Approaches
  • A 28-Year-Old Woman Presents With a Long-Standing History of Intermittently Painful “Bumps” on Both Her Shoulders and Upper Back
  • Controversies in Oncologist-Patient Communication: A Nuanced Approach to Autonomy, Culture, and Paternalism
  • Evolution of Treatment Options for Patients With CRPC and Bone Metastases: Bone-Targeted Agents That Go Beyond Palliation of Symptoms to Improve Overall Survival
  • Ending the Shortage of Generic Oncology Drugs
  • Processed and Red Meat Consumption Linked to Slight Increase in Risk of Pancreatic Cancer
  • New Mutation May Act as Driver in Subset of Lung Cancer Patients
  • Could Aspirin Be a Viable Adjuvant Treatment for Cancer?
  • Advances and New Research in the Treatment of Kidney Cancer
  • New Way to Predict Prostate Cancer Severity—Size of Prostate
  • Vismodegib Granted FDA Approval for Treatment of Basal Cell Carcinoma
  • FDA Grants Approval to Axitinib for the Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
  • Why BRAF-Mutated Colorectal Cancers Don't Respond to BRAF Inhibitors
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • When to Treat Myelodysplastic Syndromes
  • Are We Ready for Neoadjuvant Therapy in Potentially Resectable Pancreatic Cancer?
  • ASCO 2011: A Paradigm Shift in the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer
  • PSA Screening for Prostate Cancer Put Into Question By the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
  • When to Treat Myelodysplastic Syndromes
  • ASCO 2011: A Paradigm Shift in the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer
  • Are We Ready for Neoadjuvant Therapy in Potentially Resectable Pancreatic Cancer?
  • Evolving Therapeutic Paradigms for Advanced Prostate Cancer
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
JOB LISTINGS

Post a job

Powered by SearchMedica Jobs



CancerNetwork on Facebook

 

CancerNetwork | CME LLC | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2012 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy