CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
 
CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
PATIENTS
NURSES
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home »

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 17 No. 8
 

High cost of biologics takes a toll on hem/onc practices

By Karen Sandrick | August 1, 2008
The margin on IV chemotherapy administration has fallen from 20% in the 1990s to 4% to 5% today, and small practices are suffering most. Dr. Howard Burris reviews options for managing the margins.

CHICAGO—Oncologists will continue to see dwindling margins as the price of chemotherapy agents steadily rises, according to a presentation at the 2008 Oncobiotechnology Research, Clinical, and Business Summit.

The difficulty of manufacturing new chemotherapeutic agents—particularly specially formulated biologic cytotoxins—escalates the financial outlay that must be made by physicians as well as driving up the cost of drug delivery to patients, said Howard A. Burris III, MD, chief medical officer and director of drug development at the Sarah Cannon Research Institute and associate with Tennessee Oncology, both in Nashville.

“The quotes nowadays range from $1–$1.5 million per day to get a new drug to market,” Dr. Burris said during his keynote address. The summit was sponsored by Northwestern University’s Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center.

The gross margin for IV chemotherapy is only about 4% to 5%. “That’s a real factor for doctors. You wouldn’t open a high-price car dealership on a 4% to 5% margin. It would be a bad strategy,” he said.

In the late 1990s to 2000, medical oncology practices had a margin of more than 20% built into Dr. Howard Burrischemotherapy delivery. So even if patients could not meet copay requirements, physicians would not be at high financial risk. Most patients also had supplemental coverage. “Now if you are down on the copay, you can lose as much as $10,000 on a patient before you find out you are not going to get supplemental coverage,” Dr. Burris said.

Physicians also must pay a 0.75% or 1% fee to drug distributors (see ONI July 2008, page 26). “If your margin is 4% to 5%, it’s difficult to give up 25% of your profit to a wholesale distributor,” he added.

Dr. Burris offered some ways that a practice can deal with these financial pressures. One option is to form mega-oncology practice groups, particularly in areas that do not have a strong academic environment. For instance, Tennessee Oncology already has 40 medical oncologists, 9 radiation oncologists, and 5 specialists in gynecologic cancer, bone marrow transplantation, and psychology.

“There are physicians in the Nashville area who are interested in joining Tennessee Oncology just because of the significant problem of buying drugs and delivering therapy in a three- or four-physician practice,” Dr. Burris explained.

Factors such as prompt pay discounts work against small physician practices. Absolute cash outlay or accounts receivable can climb into the millions if 20 or 30 patients in a practice are on rituximab(Drug information on rituximab) (Rituxan) or cetuximab(Drug information on cetuximab) (Erbitux).

“Physicians must buy large quantities of chemotherapy, but smaller physician groups don’t have that kind of cash or bank strength, and so that cuts into their margin,” Dr. Burris said.

With doubly insured patients, such as those who have primary coverage under Medicare and backup coverage with Medicaid, each physician in Tennessee Oncology contributes $500 a month for chemotherapy care. “We come out with $20,000 a month for the group for taking care of patients, and that is only going to get worse as drug prices go up,” he said.

A less appealing solution would be to send some types of patients to hospitals for treatment, eg, those who are receiving combination therapy or who are covered through Medicare and Medicaid.

“This is not convenient for the patients, and it loses some of the physician-patient, nurse-patient continuity, but hospitals are under a different reimbursement system so ironically they won’t actually lose money on treatment,” Dr. Burris said.

Private oncology groups also may work directly with a specialty pharmacy. Tennessee Oncology entered into a joint venture with a local specialty pharmacy that delivers chemotherapy agents to patients in their homes or to physicians’ offices. The pharmacy also provides full-time secretarial support to process claims.

“Putting it all together, from the precertification through the dispensing, takes hours to days because of the paperwork and time spent on the phone. It’s not like you know Medicare is going to pay for the IV administration of paclitaxel(Drug information on paclitaxel). Even under Part B, patients have almost 100 plan choices. We have to work through that process because for every patient, it’s a completely different story,” he said.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

  • Bladder Cancer
  • Bone Metastases
  • Breast Cancer
  • CML
  • Colorectal Cancer
  • End-of-Life
  • GIST
  • Genetics Genomics
  • Gynecologic Cancers
  • Head & Neck Cancer
  • Integrative Oncology
  • Leukemia
  • Lung Cancer
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Nausea & Vomiting
  • Palliative Care
  • Pancreatic Cancer
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy
  • Prostate Cancer
  • RCC
  • Skin Cancer
  • Triple-Negative Breast
  • Testicular Cancer


More Topics 

 
PUBLICATIONS
ONCOLOGY Journal ONCOLOGY Nurse Edition Journal Cancer Management: A Multidisciplinary Approach

ONCOLOGY:
Perspectives on Best Practices

ONCOLOGY:
Nurse Edition

CANCER
MANAGEMENT
:
A Multidisciplinary
Approach


 
IMAGE IQ

This patient is at increased risk for which type of neoplasia?

A 28-year-old, slightly obese Caucasian woman presented with a long-standing history of intermittently painful “bumps” on both shoulders and her upper back.

 

More Image IQs:

 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Tax Schemes Every Physician Should Avoid
Ike Devji, JD, January 31, 2012
The next 60 days marks the final push to sell physicians across the United States tax plans of both good and questionable value.
Boosting Collections at Your Medical Practice: Whose Job Is It?
P.J. Cloud-Moulds, January 28, 2012
Embrace the relationship between your billing company and your medical practice staff.
Managing Difficult Medical Practice Employees
Shelly K. Schwartz, January 27, 2012
Tips for transforming immature staff members into great employees.
Prevent Physician Distraction When Using mHealth Technology
Aubrey Westgate, January 25, 2012
As more and more physicians use handheld mobile technology in their day-to-day work, some critics are raising concerns about “distracted doctoring.”
Can That Applicant Do the Job at Your Medical Practice?
Karen Zupko, January 25, 2012
If like many communities, yours has significant numbers of non-English speaking people with whom neither you nor your staff are able to converse, your practice is at a serious disadvantage.
 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Head and Neck Tumors
  • 46-Year-Old Woman Presents With Difficulty in Ambulation, and Swelling and Discoloration of Both Eyelids
  • Optimizing Outcomes of Advanced Prostate Cancer: Drug Sequencing and Novel Therapeutic Approaches
  • A 28-Year-Old Woman Presents With a Long-Standing History of Intermittently Painful “Bumps” on Both Her Shoulders and Upper Back
  • Controversies in Oncologist-Patient Communication: A Nuanced Approach to Autonomy, Culture, and Paternalism
  • Evolution of Treatment Options for Patients With CRPC and Bone Metastases: Bone-Targeted Agents That Go Beyond Palliation of Symptoms to Improve Overall Survival
  • Ending the Shortage of Generic Oncology Drugs
  • Processed and Red Meat Consumption Linked to Slight Increase in Risk of Pancreatic Cancer
  • New Mutation May Act as Driver in Subset of Lung Cancer Patients
  • Could Aspirin Be a Viable Adjuvant Treatment for Cancer?
  • Advances and New Research in the Treatment of Kidney Cancer
  • New Way to Predict Prostate Cancer Severity—Size of Prostate
  • Vismodegib Granted FDA Approval for Treatment of Basal Cell Carcinoma
  • FDA Grants Approval to Axitinib for the Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
  • Why BRAF-Mutated Colorectal Cancers Don't Respond to BRAF Inhibitors
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • When to Treat Myelodysplastic Syndromes
  • Are We Ready for Neoadjuvant Therapy in Potentially Resectable Pancreatic Cancer?
  • ASCO 2011: A Paradigm Shift in the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer
  • PSA Screening for Prostate Cancer Put Into Question By the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
  • When to Treat Myelodysplastic Syndromes
  • ASCO 2011: A Paradigm Shift in the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer
  • Are We Ready for Neoadjuvant Therapy in Potentially Resectable Pancreatic Cancer?
  • Evolving Therapeutic Paradigms for Advanced Prostate Cancer
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
JOB LISTINGS

Post a job

Powered by SearchMedica Jobs



CancerNetwork on Facebook

 

CancerNetwork | CME LLC | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2012 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy