CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home »

ONCOLOGY. Vol. 20 No. 13
Pages: 1  2  3  
Next
Commentary 

Prevention of Colorectal Cancer: An Emerging Role for High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation?

By

MARWAN FAKIH, MD
Assistant Professor of Medicine
Department of Medicine
Roswell Park Cancer Institute

ANNETTE SUNGA, MD, MPH
Assistant Professor
Department of Medicine
Department of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York

| November 17, 2006

Colorectal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death in the United States. It is estimated that about 55,000 patients will die this year due to advanced colorectal cancer. These grim statistics persist despite a marked increase in the rate of screening colonoscopies and improvements in adjuvant chemotherapy. Successful chemoprevention strategies may reduce the risk of new colorectal cancers, thus decreasing related overall morbidity and mortality.

Attempts at Chemoprevention

Unfortunately, the investigation of several chemoprevention agents in polyp prevention, an imperfect surrogate of colorectal cancer risk, did not result in any major breakthroughs. A controlled randomized wheat bran supplementation trial failed to show any significant decrease in the rate of adenomatous polyp recurrence in patients with previously resected adenomas.[1] Another controlled randomized study of calcium carbonate(Drug information on calcium carbonate), 3,000 mg/d, showed a moderate decrease in risk of polyp recurrence that barely reached statistical significance.[2]

Daily aspirin(Drug information on aspirin) supplementation was also investigated in the prevention of polyp recurrence in two large controlled studies.[3,4] One randomized study showed a significant reduction in polyp recurrence among patients with resected colon cancer receiving 325 mg of aspirin per day.[4] However, the second study showed a significant reduction in polyp recurrence in a population of patients with a history of resected polyps only in the arm receiving low-dose aspirin at 81 mg/d.[3] Given the risks of bleeding associated with aspirin use, it would be unjustified to implement widespread use of low-dose aspirin for the purpose of colorectal cancer prevention.

Celecoxib (Celebrex), a selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 nonsteroidal inhibitor associated with a decreased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, has been shown to reduce the risk of polyp recurrence.[5,6] However, this agent is unlikely to be used any further in large-scale prevention efforts, given its association with an increased incidence of cardiovascular events.[6]

Recently, the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study reported on the value of vitamin D at 400 IU/d in combination with 1,000 mg/d of elemental calcium vs a matched placebo in more that 36,000 postmenopausal women.[7] Participants in this study received vitamin D or placebo for an average of 7 years. No reduction in the risk of colorectal cancer was noted on the treatment arm.[7] This is the only adequately powered prevention study so far to use colorectal cancer incidence as an outcome measure for colorectal cancer prevention. Despite the negative results from the WHI study, a growing body of preclinical and clinical evidence supports the use of vitamin D3 supplementation for the purpose of colorectal cancer prevention.

Underlying Pathophysiology

Normal, precancerous, and cancerous colonic epithelium may be targets of vitamin D through its direct effect on vitamin D receptors (VDR).[8-12] VDR expression increases in the progression from normal mucosa to premalignant or early malignant tissue (aberrant crypt foci, polyps, and differentiated adenocarcinoma).[10,12] VDR is the target of the active vitamin D compound 1,25 hydroxy-vitamin D (1,25-OH D3), and the binding of this compound to VDR results in antiproliferating and differentiating activities. The importance of VDR activation in preventing carcinogenesis has been demonstrated in several preclinical models. An inverse relationship between cellular proliferation and VDR expression was demonstrated in mouse colon.[13] Furthermore, complete loss of VDR (knockout mice) was associated with an increased proliferation and increased oxidative DNA stress, which may promote carcinogenesis.[13,14] In addition, vitamin D3 antitumor activity was documented in an APCmin mouse model.[15]

Vitamin D3 antiproliferative effects on colonic epithelium have also been demonstrated in human subjects. The supplementation of vitamin D3 in combination with calcium carbonate was shown to reduce the proliferative index and increase VDR expression in colonic polyps and mucosa.[16] Furthermore, an inverse relationship between serum 25-OH D3 levels and whole-crypt proliferative index had been previously documented.[17]

Clinical Evidence

Pages: 1  2  3  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
IMAGE IQ

A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
Brian Morse, MD1 , June 10, 2013

A 48-year-old female presents with complaints of irregular vaginal bleeding and postcoital bleeding. Images from a PET/CT and pelvis MRI reveal characteristic findings. What is your diagnosis?

More Image IQs 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
  • ASCO: Yoga Reduces Insomnia in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Hormone Therapy
  • Physical Activity Across the Cancer Continuum
  • Exercise After Cancer Diagnosis: Time to Get Moving
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • ASCO: Vinegar Screening Significantly Reduces Cervical Cancer Mortality
  • ASCO: Sulforaphane in Prostate Cancer Found Worthy of Further Investigation
  • Study: Recurrent Heartburn Ups Risk for Throat Cancer
  • HER2-Directed Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation: The Current State of Our Knowledge
  • It’s Time for Clinicians to Reconsider Their Proscription Against the Use of Soyfoods by Breast Cancer Patients
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • ASCO: No Benefit From Avastin in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter



CancerNetwork on Facebook

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy