CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home »

ONCOLOGY. Vol. 20 No. 14
Pages: 1  2  
Next
The Shashaty/Frankewich/Chakraborti et al Article Reviewed 

Reflections on an Important New Treatment Option

By

JANET L. KWIATKOWSKI, MD
Assistant Professor of Pediatrics
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
Attending Hematologist
The Children's Hospital
of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

| December 1, 2006

The authors provide an excellent summary of the key clinical study data utilized in the process of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of desferasirox (Exjade). Regular red cell transfusions are used in the management of a number of hematologic disorders including thalassemia, sickle cell disease, myelodysplastic syndrome, and rare anemias such as Diamond-Blackfan anemia, Fanconi anemia, and sideroblastic anemias. This treatment reduces complications of the underlying disorder and can be lifesaving, but in the absence of chelation, progressive iron overload results, causing hepatic disease, endocrinopathies, and cardiac disease. Despite the availability of deferoxamine(Drug information on deferoxamine), death from iron overload still occurs because compliance with deferoxamine is limited by the cumbersome parenteral route of administration. Deferasirox(Drug information on deferasirox) is the first orally administered chelator to receive FDA approval, providing an important treatment option for patients with transfusional iron overload.

Efficacy and Dose Requirements

In the pivotal phase III trial, doses of 20 or 30 mg/kg of deferasirox were as effective as deferoxamine in maintaining or reducing hepatic iron content.[1] With ongoing transfusion therapy, doses of 5 and 10 mg/kg of deferasirox were inadequate in most patients, leading to a rise in hepatic iron content. It is important to note that although, on average, deferasirox at a dose of 20 mg/kg resulted in equal iron balance (able to remove the iron from continued transfusions but not previously accumulated iron), this dose was not effective in all patients. Doses of 30 mg/kg achieved negative iron balance in most patients.

Subsequent analyses have shown that the response to deferasirox (and to deferoxamine) is dependent upon ongoing tranfusional requirements. In those with lower transfusional iron intake averaging < 0.3 mg/kg/d, doses of 10 to 20 mg/kg were effective in reducing hepatic iron content, whereas in those with the highest iron intake of > 0.5 mg/kg/d, higher doses of 20 to 30 mg/kg/d were required.[2,3] Close monitoring of trends in iron burden using serum ferritin or hepatic iron levels (eg, with noninvasive R2 magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] techniques) can also aid in monitoring treatment response. Thus, dosing of deferasirox should be individualized based on the goal of maintenance or reduction of iron stores, ongoing transfusional requirements, and trends in iron burden during treatment.

Removal of Cardiac Iron

Given that cardiac disease is the major cause of death in those with transfusional iron overload,[4] the ability of a chelator to remove cardiac iron is crucial. The deferasirox phase II and III study endpoints assessed change in hepatic iron and ferritin levels; cardiac iron was not assessed, and therefore, the ability of deferasirox to remove cardiac iron and prevent or reverse cardiac complications is still unknown. Hepatic iron concentration is predictive of cardiac complications in patients with thalassemia; those with hepatic iron content greater than 15 mg/g dry weight of liver have the highest risk of heart disease.[5] However, hepatic iron can be low in the presence of substantial cardiac iron loading.

It is becoming evident that various chelators have differential effects on cardiac iron removal. Increasing evidence supports that deferiprone(Drug information on deferiprone), an oral chelator licensed in Europe but not approved in the United States, is more effective than deferoxamine in reducing both cardiac disease and cardiac iron content, as measured by cardiac T2* MRI.[6,7] This appears to be related to the smaller size and net neutral charge that allows deferiprone to penetrate myocytes.

Preliminary data suggest that deferasirox may be effective in removing cardiac iron. In cultured heart muscle, deferasirox was able to extract intracellular iron and restore iron-impaired contractility.[8] Furthermore, in a preliminary report of 23 patients receiving deferasirox at doses of 10 to 30 mg/kg/d, cardiac T2* MRI—a measure of cardiac iron content—improved from an average of 18 to 23.1 ms over a treatment period of 13 months (lower T2* values signify greater iron loading).[9] Further studies are needed to confirm the effect of deferasirox on cardiac iron and cardiac disease.

Safety

The toxicity profile of deferasirox is similar across disease states and appears to be acceptable. The most common side effects of deferasirox are gastrointestinal disturbances, skin rash, mild elevations in serum creatinine levels, and elevations in hepatic transaminases. In the clinical trials as well as in clinical practice, gastrointestinal effects including abdominal pain and diarrhea have led to discontinuation of the drug in some patients. Agranulocytosis, a serious toxicity associated with the chelator deferiprone,[10] was not seen with deferasirox administration. The rare reports of neutropenia with deferasirox were all felt to be related to the underlying hematologic disorder and unlikely to be a drug effect. Importantly, long-term data on treatment with deferasirox are lacking, and less common side effects may only become evident when larger numbers of patients have been treated for a longer duration. Thus, it is crucial to continue to monitor the results of the ongoing extension studies.

Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.

This commentary refers to the following article

Deferasirox for the Treatment of Chronic Iron Overload in Transfusional Hemosiderosis






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
IMAGE IQ

A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
Brian Morse, MD1 , June 10, 2013

A 48-year-old female presents with complaints of irregular vaginal bleeding and postcoital bleeding. Images from a PET/CT and pelvis MRI reveal characteristic findings. What is your diagnosis?

More Image IQs 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
  • ASCO: Yoga Reduces Insomnia in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Hormone Therapy
  • Physical Activity Across the Cancer Continuum
  • Exercise After Cancer Diagnosis: Time to Get Moving
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • ASCO: Vinegar Screening Significantly Reduces Cervical Cancer Mortality
  • ASCO: Sulforaphane in Prostate Cancer Found Worthy of Further Investigation
  • Study: Recurrent Heartburn Ups Risk for Throat Cancer
  • Radiation-Induced Enteritis: Incidence, Mechanisms, and Management
  • HER2-Directed Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation: The Current State of Our Knowledge
  • It’s Time for Clinicians to Reconsider Their Proscription Against the Use of Soyfoods by Breast Cancer Patients
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter



CancerNetwork on Facebook

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy