CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home »

ONCOLOGY. Vol. 16 No. 6 6
Pages: 1  2  3  4  
Next
 

Docetaxel for Previously Treated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

By

Frank V. Fossella, MD
Professor, Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas

| June 1, 2002
Two phase III trials were conducted using docetaxel (Taxotere), administered every 3 weeks, as second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. In the TAX 317 trial, 204 patients were randomized to receive either docetaxel (49 received 100 mg/m² and 55 received 75 mg/m²) or best supportive care (100 patients). Median survival was 7.5 months with docetaxel at 75 mg/m² (D75) vs 4.6 months for best supportive care (P = .010); and 1-year survival was 37% for D75 vs 11% for best supportive care (P = .010). Quality-of-life analysis also showed statistically significant improvement in disease-related symptoms with docetaxel vs best supportive care. In the TAX 320 study, 373 patients were randomized to receive docetaxel at 100 mg/m² (D100), docetaxel at 75 mg/m² (D75), or a control arm of either vinorelbine (Navelbine) or ifosfamide (Ifex) (V/I). Partial response rates were 11.9% with D100 and 7.5% with D75 vs 1% with V/I (P values: .001 [D100] and .036 [D75]). Median response duration was over 7 months. One-year survival was 32% with D75 vs 19% in V/I (P = .025). Prior paclitaxel exposure had no bearing on the response rate and survival advantage of second-line treatment with docetaxel. Response rates to docetaxel were equivalent in the cohort of patients who had received prior paclitaxel (10.5%) and the group of patients who had not received prior paclitaxel (8.5%). The 1-year survival rates for patients with no prior paclitaxel therapy were 33% (D75) vs 20% (V/I); and the 1-year survival rates for patients who had received prior paclitaxel were 30% (D75) vs 17% (V/I). In conclusion, two large randomized phase III trials of second-line chemotherapy for NSCLC have shown significant differences favoring docetaxel for response rate, time to progression, survival, and quality of life. Prior paclitaxel did not decrease the likelihood of response to docetaxel, nor did it lessen the survival advantage seen with docetaxel. Docetaxel offers a clinically meaningful benefit in this setting, with manageable toxicity. Based upon the observed response rates, survival, impact on quality of life, and toxicity profile, the optimal dose of docetaxel in this pretreated population is 75 mg/m² every 3 weeks. [ONCOLOGY 16(Suppl 6):45-51, 2002]

In the past several years, medical oncologists have become increasingly aware that a subset of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may benefit from second-line chemotherapy after the failure of first-line therapy. Most of the data in support of the use of second-line chemotherapy has been with docetaxel(Drug information on docetaxel) (Taxotere).

Docetaxel as a first-line agent for advanced NSCLC showed consistent response rates in phase II trials that ranged from 23% to 38%.[1-5] Average median survival is 39 weeks and 1-year survival is 34%. Docetaxel also has been systematically evaluated in the second-line setting for NSCLC patients whose disease has progressed or failed to respond to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Objective radiographic responses were consistently seen in four phase II studies of docetaxel in the second-line setting, and ranged from 16% to 22%.[4-8] Favorable survival rates were noted as well in these trials; the median survival rate ranged from 5.8 to 9.8 months, and the estimated 1-year survival rate ranged from 25% to 44% (Table 1).[4,6-8]

The most compelling evidence to support docetaxel’s activity in the second-line treatment of NSCLC comes from two large randomized phase III trials that compared docetaxel with either best supportive care (TAX 317) [9] or a comparator regimen of chemotherapy (TAX 320) [10] (Figure 1).

Phase III Trial of Docetaxel vs Best Supportive Care

The TAX 317 trial was a multicenter international trial of second-line chemotherapy with docetaxel reported by Shepherd.[9,11] Eligible patients had advanced NSCLC that had progressed during or after one or more platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens. There was no restriction on the number of prior chemotherapy cycles or regimens, and there was no restriction on the prior chemotherapy agents permitted (with the exception that patients with prior paclitaxel(Drug information on paclitaxel) exposure were excluded). Patients were required to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2. Patients with treated brain metastases were included in the trial.

Eligible patients were stratified by their best response to prior platinum-based chemotherapy and performance status and then randomly assigned to receive either docetaxel every 3 weeks or best supportive care. The initial trial design called for a docetaxel dose of 100 mg/m² (D100) as a 1-hour IV infusion every 3 weeks. However, because of an unexpectedly high occurrence of adverse events occurring at this dose level, the protocol was subsequently modified to a docetaxel dose of 75 mg/m² (D75) every 3 weeks.

A total of 204 patients were enrolled in this trial: 49 received docetaxel at 100 mg/m², 55 received docetaxel at 75 mg/m², and 100 received best supportive care. Patient characteristics and updated results are summarized in Table 2. About 80% of patients had stage IV disease, and nearly 25% of patients had a performance status of 2. The demographics with regard to age and gender were typical for this patient population and were well balanced among the treatment groups. The predominant histology was adenocarcinoma. One-quarter of patients had received two or more prior chemotherapy regimens before enrollment.

Partial response was observed in 6% of patients treated with docetaxel (either dose level), and another 40% of patients had stable disease. The median response duration was 26 weeks. Time to progression favored treatment with docetaxel vs best supportive care. The median time to progression was 12.3 weeks with D75 vs 7 weeks with best supportive care (P = .004).

Pages: 1  2  3  4  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
IMAGE IQ

A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
Brian Morse, MD1 , June 10, 2013

A 48-year-old female presents with complaints of irregular vaginal bleeding and postcoital bleeding. Images from a PET/CT and pelvis MRI reveal characteristic findings. What is your diagnosis?

More Image IQs 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • Lower Back Pain in an Elderly Man With a History of Localized Prostate Cancer
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • Bladder Cancer Recurrence High, Better Follow-Up Care Needed
  • ASCO: Post-Surgery Surveillance Found Safe in Seminoma
  • Fertility Preservation in Women With Breast Cancer: Challenges and Opportunities
  • Addressing Fertility Concerns in Women Diagnosed With Breast Cancer: Will Serial Reserve Screening Help?
  • Postmenopausal Hormone Receptor–Positive Advanced Breast Cancer
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • ASCO: Vinegar Screening Significantly Reduces Cervical Cancer Mortality
  • ASCO: Sulforaphane in Prostate Cancer Found Worthy of Further Investigation
  • Study: Recurrent Heartburn Ups Risk for Throat Cancer
  • HER2-Directed Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation: The Current State of Our Knowledge
  • It’s Time for Clinicians to Reconsider Their Proscription Against the Use of Soyfoods by Breast Cancer Patients
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • ASCO: No Benefit From Avastin in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter



CancerNetwork on Facebook

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy