CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home »

ONCOLOGY. Vol. 13 No. 11
 

Book Review: Breast Cancer

By

Editor: Daniel F. Roses, MD
Publisher: Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Pages: 685, 595 illustrations
Price: $160.00

Reviewed by Yvedt L. Matory, MD, Division of Surgical Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

| November 1, 1999


The editor of Breast Cancer is Daniel F. Roses, MD, a professor of surgery at New York University and director of the Comprehensive Breast Cancer Center at that institution. Its contributors include Pat Borgen, MD, from Memorial Sloan-Kettering, Armando Giuliano, MD, from the University of California, Alison Estabrook, MD, from St. Luke’s Roosevelt Hospital, Frea Schnabel, MD, from Columbia-Presbyterian, David Page, MD, from Vanderbilt University, Larry Norton, MD, from Memorial Sloan-Kettering, and John Neiderhuber, MD, from the University of Wisconsin Medical Center. All of these notable individuals have made significant contributions to the management of patients with breast cancer.

This book is one of several major texts focusing on diseases of the breast and breast cancer. The other texts include Cancer of the Breast by Donegan and Spratt, and two more extensive texts, Diseases of the Breast by Harris, Lichtman, Morrow, and Helmann, and The Breast, edited by Bland and Copeland. Breast Cancer is distinguished from these other references by being somewhat more readable.

The paragraph subtitles used throughout this text all take the form of questions. However, in some instances, the question format fragments the text. Throughout the book, there are factual inconsistencies in the discussion of specific topics. Also, the depth of discussion varies from one chapter to another.

An example of factual inconsistency can be found in the chapter on prevention by Etkind and Sparano. This chapter contains two contradictory statements about the complications of tamoxifen(Drug information on tamoxifen) (Nolvadex). In one subheading, the drug is described as “relatively devoid of serious short-term or long-term side effects with the exception of an approximately twofold increased risk of endometrial carcinoma.” In that same chapter, tamoxifen is described as being associated with a “fivefold elevation in the risk of endometrial cancer and a twofold elevation in the risk of thrombophlebotic events.”

The same type of inconsistency is found in the chapter entitled “Multi-modality treatment of stage I and stage II breast cancer,” authored by John Niederhuber, MD. This chapter has a table devoted to postmastectomy radiation therapy for patients with advanced (T3 or T4) lesions. These are not patients with stage I and II disease. As a result, it is unclear whether the chapter focuses on early- or late-stage breast cancer.

In some cases, it is difficult to tell which audience the book is directed toward—a general audience seeking basic information or a specialized audience seeking specific details. For example, David Roses’ chapter entitled “Development of modern breast cancer treatment” is very well written and engaging. It provides extensive detail about the historical aspects of breast cancer management. This level of detail, however, is out of proportion to the discussion of more practical matters throughout the book.

In contrast, the book treats a very important matter—the medicolegal aspects of breast cancer care—in a superficial manner. The “discussion” of these issues is limited to a chart in the chapter on radiologic assessment. In contrast, the competing texts devote an entire chapter to medicolegal issues. Understanding these issues is crucial for both the breast cancer specialist and nonspecialist.

In summary, it is very difficult to write a text that satisfies the needs of all readers. Breast Cancer appears to be geared toward a general audience that may be seeking specific answers to questions. In many ways, it is very readable, but there are some factual inconsistencies and some variation in the level of detail provided. Breast Cancer is distinguished from other similar texts, in part, by its authors and by being somewhat more readable than its competition.


 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
IMAGE IQ

A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
Brian Morse, MD1 , June 10, 2013

A 48-year-old female presents with complaints of irregular vaginal bleeding and postcoital bleeding. Images from a PET/CT and pelvis MRI reveal characteristic findings. What is your diagnosis?

More Image IQs 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Soluble HER2 Levels Prognostic Factor in HER2+ Breast Cancer
  • ASCO: PD-L1 Antibody Elicits Durable Response in RCC
  • RECORD-3: Sunitinib Still Standard First-Line Treatment in Metastatic RCC
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • ASCO: Vinegar Screening Significantly Reduces Cervical Cancer Mortality
  • ASCO: Sulforaphane in Prostate Cancer Found Worthy of Further Investigation
  • Study: Recurrent Heartburn Ups Risk for Throat Cancer
  • Radiation-Induced Enteritis: Incidence, Mechanisms, and Management
  • HER2-Directed Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation: The Current State of Our Knowledge
  • It’s Time for Clinicians to Reconsider Their Proscription Against the Use of Soyfoods by Breast Cancer Patients
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter



CancerNetwork on Facebook

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy