CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home »

ONCOLOGY. Vol. 14 No. 6 2
Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Pentostatin and Rituximab in the Treatment of Patients With B-Cell Malignancies

By

Robert Drapkin, MD
Director of Oncology Research, Department of Medical Oncology,
Florida Community Cancer Centers, Clearwater and Palm Harbor, Florida

| June 1, 2000

Both pentostatin (Nipent) and rituximab (Rituxan) have single-agent activity in B-cell malignancies, including indolent and intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). Pentostatin is also active in pretreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In spite of current treatment modalities, few patients with these diseases are cured. The combination of rituximab and pentostatin is an attractive treatment option because both drugs have a limited toxicity profile and can be delivered on an outpatient basis. We describe the design of a phase II multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pentostatin in combination with rituximab in patients with previously treated and untreated low-grade NHL and CLL. [ONCOLOGY 14(Suppl 2):25-29, 2000]


Pentostatin (Nipent) is a nucleoside analog that irreversibly inhibits the enzyme adenosine(Drug information on adenosine) deaminase. This results in inhibition of the deamination of adenosine to inosine and of deoxyadenosine to deoxyinosine in the purine salvage pathway. The ensuing accumulation of metabolites inhibits ribonucleotide reductase, thus depleting the nucleotide pool and limiting DNA synthesis. This is the proposed mechanism of action for inhibition of rapidly proliferating cells, such as those of acute lymphoblastic leukemia.[1] Conversely, how pentostatin inhibits slowly proliferating cells, such as those of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL), is still under investigation.

Adenosine deaminase is concentrated in lymphoid tissue, including both T and B cells; however, the cytotoxic effect of pentostatin in humans is independent of intracellular concentrations of adenosine deaminase. Response rates of 25% to 32% are seen in heavily pretreated patients with B-CLL[2-6] and indolent lymphomas.[7-9] Responses reported after treatment with 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (cladribine, [Leustatin]), fludarabine (Fludara), and alkylating agents suggest possible non–cross-resistance to pentostatin.

Activity of Pentostatin

Pentostatin is active in CLL, achieving response rates between 18% and 35% in patients heavily pretreated with cytotoxic chemotherapy.[2-6] Phase II studies of single-agent pentostatin in heavily pretreated patients with low- or intermediate-grade NHL report response rates between 17% and 23% (Table 1).[7-9] The majority of these responses occurred in the low-grade NHL patients. Combining these reports, the response rate for pentostatin in low-grade NHL is 26%. The efficacy of pentostatin in untreated patients with CLL or NHL has not been explored.

Phase II Study

A phase II study was conducted in patients with CLL who received single-agent pentostatin at an intravenous dose of 4 mg/m²/wk for 3 weeks initially, then every 2 weeks.[3] The observed toxicities are listed in Table 2. In the study by Dillman et al,[3] severe toxicity was uncommon in the presence of normal renal function and normal bone marrow reserve. The most frequent grade 1 to 2 toxicity was nausea and vomiting, and it occurred in approximately 50% of patients. The majority of patients did not experience neutropenia or anemia.

However, infection was a major, life-threatening complication. Grade 3 to 5 infections occurred in 34% of patients. These patients were heavily pretreated, and infections are expected to occur in such immunodeficient populations. By definition, patients with B-cell malignancies have an immune deficiency, and this deficiency is increased initially by pentostatin’s depression of both T and B lymphocytes.

Phase I Study

Among the first 300 patients enrolled in a phase I trial, the overall incidence of grade 3 to 5 infections was 8%.[10] This included viral, fungal, and bacterial infections of both high and low pathogenicity. Cummings et al[9] administered pentostatin to 37 patients with refractory lymphomas and cutaneous T-cell disease at a dose of 5 mg/m²/d for 3 days, every 3 weeks. Three patients developed grade 4 infections and two died from infection.

It is important to note that these trials were conducted before the widespread use of hematopoietic growth factors.

Abating Toxicity

To prevent infectious complications, all patients with B-cell malignancies treated with pentostatin should receive prophylaxis for both viral and opportunistic infections, when indicated, with trimethoprim(Drug information on trimethoprim)-sulfamethoxazole and acyclovir. When neutropenic, patients should receive growth factor support with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (Neupogen) or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (Leukine, Prokine).

Furthermore, to decrease overall toxicity, a dose of 4 mg/m² of pentostatin administered on an every-other-week schedule has been recommended.[5,11] With such a dose and schedule, it is unlikely that prohibitive toxicity will develop, making pentostatin a “patient-friendly” drug.

Background of Rituximab(Drug information on rituximab)

Rituximab (Rituxan) is a genetically engineered chimeric murine/human monoclonal antibody directed against the CD20 antigen found on the surface of normal and malignant B lymphocytes. The antibody is an immunoglobulin G–k containing murine light- and heavy-chain variable sequences and human constant region sequences.[12] It is produced by suspending Chinese hamster ovary cell cultures in a nutrient medium. The antibody is purified by affinity and ion exchange chromatography, resulting in a sterile, preservative-free liquid concentrate for intravenous administration.

The Fab domain of rituximab binds to the CD20 antigen on B lymphocytes, and the Fc domain recruits immune effector functions to mediate B-cell lysis in vitro. Possible mechanisms of cell lysis include complement-dependent cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity.[12] Rituximab binding occurs on lymphoid cells in the thymus, in the white pulp of the spleen, and on the majority of B lymphocytes in the peripheral blood and lymph nodes.

In patients given 375 mg/m² of rituximab as an intravenous infusion, the serum half-life may be proportional to the B-cell burden and ranges from 11.1 to 104.6 hours.[13] The pharmacokinetic profile of rituximab remains unaffected by concomitant chemotherapy with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin(Drug information on doxorubicin), Oncovin, and prednisone(Drug information on prednisone)).[14] Administration of rituximab results in a rapid and sustained depletion of circulating and tissue-based B cells. B-cell recovery begins 6 months after 4 weekly cycles of rituximab at 375 mg/m² and returns to normal by 12 months.[13]

Pretreatment Abates Toxicity

A phase III study demonstrated a 48% (80 of 166) response rate in previously treated outpatients with low-grade and follicular B-cell lymphoma who received intravenous rituximab at 375 mg/m² once per week for 4 weeks.[15,16] Of these responses, 6% were complete responses and the remainder (42%) partial responses. Adverse events were observed during the first infusion and were generally mild. They included fever, chills, headache, nausea, vomiting, rhinitis, bronchospasm, leukopenia, and grade 1 to 2 hypotension.[14] Among the 619 adverse events reported during therapy, 18 were grade 3 events and two were grade 4 events (arrhythmia, 1; neutropenia, 1).[16] Table 3 summarizes the toxicity profile of single-agent rituximab.

The initial phase I study of rituximab used no pretreatment medications; consequently, nearly 80% of patients in that trial experienced some toxicity during the first rituximab infusion. At present, premedication with corticosteroids, antihistamines, and antiemetics is routine, and the majority of patients experience little toxicity. Rituximab, therefore, has a better safety profile compared to combination chemotherapy in low-grade malignant lymphoma.

Evaluation of the Pentostatin/Rituximab Combination

Studies previously cited in this article have confirmed that both pentostatin and rituximab have single-agent activity in B-cell malignancies, including indolent and intermediate-grade NHL, and that pentostatin is clearly active in CLL. These results led us to design a phase II multicenter trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pentostatin in combination with rituximab in patients with low-grade NHL and CLL. In all patients, qualitative and quantitative toxicities, as well as their duration and reversibility, will be assessed. Response rates and the durability of objective responses will also be evaluated.

Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
IMAGE IQ

A 52-Year-Old Man Presents With an Erythematous Lesion
Cesar Moran, MD , May 22, 2013

A 52-year-old man presented with an erythematous lesion in the axilla of unknown duration. Surgical excision was performed. What is your diagnosis?

More Image IQs 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Five Steps to Improving Patient Access
Judy Capko,  May 21, 2013
Patient access is getting increased attention through reform initiatives. Here are five steps you can take to make sure patients get appropriate access to care in your office.
Growing HIPAA Threat – Ignore Windows XP at Your Own Peril
Marion K. Jenkins,  May 21, 2013
Chances are good that you have some major ticking software time bombs lurking in your medical practice's computer environment, namely Windows XP and Server 2003.
Finding Physician Work-Life Balance in the Small Moments
Jennifer Frank, MD,  May 21, 2013
At my practice and at home, things are always busy. There's laundry or homework, or a patient with needs.
Three Areas to Reduce Costs at Your Medical Practice
Greg Mertz,  May 19, 2013
By taking a hard look at reducing costs for staffing, overhead, and technology at your medical practice, you may see increased physician compensation.
Dos and Don’ts for Starting a Physician Blog
Michael Woo-Ming, MD,  May 18, 2013
Starting a physician blog can provide your medical practice with marketing benefits, but it's important to do it right.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • The ABCDEs of Moles and Melanomas
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Therapy Innovations
  • A 52-Year-Old Man Presents With an Erythematous Lesion
  • Bone Metastases
  • Palliative Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Bone Metastases Improves Quality of Life
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Financial Toxicity, Part II: How Can We Help With the Burden of Treatment-Related Costs?
  • Patient Quality of Life Endpoints in Oncology Trials, Part II
  • Who's Coding Whom?
  • “How Do I Say This Nicely? Your Oncologist Wasn't Following Guidelines”
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • Cancer Metabolism as a Therapeutic Target
  • Study: Cholesterol Drugs Reduced Risk of Prostate Cancer Death
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • ONS: Safe Handling of Chemotherapy
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter



CancerNetwork on Facebook

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy