CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home »

ONCOLOGY. Vol. 14 No. 10 9
 

UFT/Leucovorin in Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Administered With Radiotherapy

By

Claes Mercke, MD
Oncology Department, Sahlgrenska Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden

| October 1, 2000
This is an open-label, nonrandomized phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity of UFT plus leucovorin when given concomitantly with hyperfractionated radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer. The study period is determined by the course of radiotherapy, which is given as 1.7 Gy per fraction twice daily for 5 days (Monday to Friday) in 2 consecutive weeks, followed by 1 week of rest, and subsequently another 2 weeks of radiotherapy (Monday to Friday plus Monday to Thursday). Total duration of therapy will be 5 weeks. [ONCOLOGY 14(Suppl 9):79-81, 2000]

Introduction

Radiotherapy and UFT (uracil and tegafur(Drug information on tegafur)) plus oral leucovorin (a combination being developed under the trade name Orzel) are administered simultaneously for the treatment of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The starting dose level is UFT at 150 mg/m²/d plus leucovorin at 90 mg/d in three divided doses (Table 1 and Table 2).

Toxicity is determined for each cohort of three or more patients. If no dose-limiting toxicity is observed, the UFT dose is escalated in the next cohort of three patients (each dose level increases by 50 mg/m²/day). The dose of oral leucovorin remains fixed at 90 mg/day. If a dose limiting toxicity is observed in one of three patients, the cohort is expanded to include six patients, and if dose-limiting toxicity is observed in only one of six patients, dose escalation continues.

The maximum tolerated dose is defined as the dose level at which two or more of six patients experience a dose-limiting toxicity. A dose for phase II testing will then be recommended. Additional patients, to a maximum of 12, are then enrolled at one dose level below the maximum tolerated dose.

Inclusion Criteria

Eligibility is defined according to the following inclusion criteria: (1) histologically confirmed stage III or IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region; (2) evaluable or measurable disease; (3) age ³ 18 years; (4) World Health Organization performance status £ 2; (5) life expectancy of ³ 3 months, allowing for adequate follow-up of toxicity evaluation; (6) patient’s written consent according to local Ethics Committee requirements; (7) no previous treatment with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or radiotherapy (prior experimental therapy is not allowed); (8) absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ³ 2.0 ´ 109/L, platelet count ³ 100 ´ 109/L; (9) liver function test values should be bilirubin £ 1.25 ´ upper limit of normal, aspartate aminotransferase £ 2 ´ upper limit of normal, alanine aminotransferase £ 2 ´ upper limit of normal, alkaline phosphatase £ 2 ´ upper limit of normal; (10) serum creatinine £ 1.25 ´ upper limit of normal; (11) all women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test (minimum sensitivity 25 IU/L of b-HCG [human chorionic gonadotropin]) within 72 hours prior to the start of study medication; (12) patients must be able to take oral medication; and (13) no clinical signs of brain involvement or leptomeningeal disease.

Exclusion Criteria

Patients are excluded if any one of the following is met: (1) distant metastatic disease; (2) any other concomitant malignancy, with the exception of adequately treated basal cell skin cancer or in situ cervical cancer; (3) inability to follow the treatment and evaluation schedule; (4) any other condition or therapy that, in the investigator’s opinion, may pose a risk to the patient or interfere with the study objectives; (5) pregnant or nursing women or women of childbearing potential not using adequate methods of birth control; (6) patients with active infections or any other serious underlying medical condition that would impair the ability of the patient to receive protocol treatment; (7) one or both eyes are to be included in the irradiated area; (8) the planned external irradiation doses exceed 68 Gy to the tumor.

Dose-Limiting Toxicities

Dose-limiting toxicity is defined as one of the following: (1) continuous mucositis grade 4 during weeks 4 and 5 resulting in interruption of the radiotherapy treatment; (2) grade ³ 3 nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea despite medical intervention; (3) grade 4 hematologic toxicity or neutropenic fever; (4) compliance below 75% of planned chemotherapy dose during the treatment period due to toxicity; (5) prolongation of the rest period resulting in a total treatment period > 5 weeks; (6) grade ³ 3 neurologic toxicity; (7) grade ³ 3 renal, hepatic, cardiac, or pulmonary toxicity (alopecia will not be considered a DLT).

Results

Patient characteristics are outlined in Table 3. To date, complete responses have been seen in five patients (Table 4). Toxicity is detailed in Table 5.

Conclusions

Concomitant UFT plus leucovorin and hyperfractionated radiotherapy at low doses of UFT is feasible and well tolerated. Non–dose-limiting grade 3/4 mucositis was seen in all patients at the first two dose levels tested. Other nonhematologic toxicity was mild. No hematologic toxicity has been observed yet. The combinationof UFT/leucovorin with hyperfractionated radiotherapy shows promising activity.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
IMAGE IQ

Lower Back Pain in an Elderly Man With a History of Localized Prostate Cancer
James B. Yu, MD1 , May 17, 2013

A 70-year-old man with a history of localized prostate cancer treated with whole-pelvis radiation therapy with a boost to the prostate, in conjunction with androgen deprivation therapy 7 years prior, presented with lower back pain. A bone scan revealed an area of activity in the sacrum. What is the most likely diagnosis?

More Image IQs 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Primary Care Can't Thrive Without Nurse Practitioners
Courtney H. Lyder, ND,  May 17, 2013
With a projected shortfall of primary-care physicians, it's time for alternate solutions to patient care. Nurse practitioners are one logical remedy.
VWhat Physicians Can Learn from the Allscripts EHR Lawsuit
Marisa Torrieri,  May 16, 2013
Lawsuit prompts question: What should physicians do to ensure they end up with a great EHR instead of buyer’s remorse?
Eight Ways ICD-9 Will Still Matter to Medical Practices
Brenda Edwards, CPC,  May 15, 2013
What should your medical practice do with your ICD-9-CM book after October 1, 2014? Keep it.
Seven Ways Technology Can Speed Up Patient Collections
Cheyenne Brinson,  May 15, 2013
Failing to adopt widely available billing and collections technology can cost medical practices big. Here's how to do it right.
Four Reasons Private Medical Practice is Becoming Extinct
Carol Stryker,  May 15, 2013
It’s becoming increasingly difficult for private medical practices to thrive. Here’s what’s driving the trend toward consolidation.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Skin Lesions
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • New AUA Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Screening
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • Genomics Studies Identify Testicular Cancer Risk Variants
  • Lower Back Pain in an Elderly Man With a History of Localized Prostate Cancer
  • FDA Approves Erlotinib (Tarceva) as First-Line Lung Cancer Therapy for Certain Patients
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Financial Toxicity, Part II: How Can We Help With the Burden of Treatment-Related Costs?
  • Patient Quality of Life Endpoints in Oncology Trials, Part II
  • Who's Coding Whom?
  • “How Do I Say This Nicely? Your Oncologist Wasn't Following Guidelines”
  • Study: Cholesterol Drugs Reduced Risk of Prostate Cancer Death
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • ONS: Safe Handling of Chemotherapy
  • Financial Toxicity, Part II: How Can We Help With the Burden of Treatment-Related Costs?
  • Conflicts of Interest in Medicine: What About Ties to Payers?
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter



CancerNetwork on Facebook

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy