CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home »

ONCOLOGY. Vol. 15 No. 3 5
Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Camptothecin Schedule and Timing of Administration With Irradiation

By

Tyvin A. Rich, MD
Professor, Radiation Oncology
Alexander V. Kirichenko, MD, PhD
Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia

| March 2, 2001

The camptothecins are a new class of chemotherapeutic radiation sensitizers. Clinical trials with camptothecins alone show higher toxicity than predicted by preclinical models, which has created the challenge of finding new ways to widen the therapeutic window. Camptothecin dose, schedule, and timing with irradiation are important factors that need to be considered in the design of new studies with these S-phase agents. Data are reviewed from early phase I and II chemoradiation trials, including a multicenter, phase II study planned by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) in operable rectal cancer using irinotecan (CPT-11, Camptosar). One novel approach (based on preclinical observations) with the potential to widen the therapeutic window may be the use of a chronomodulated camptothecin delivery schedule with irradiation. [ONCOLOGY 15(Suppl 5):37-41, 2001]


Introduction

The camptothecin analog irinotecan(Drug information on irinotecan) (CPT-11, Camptosar) was recently approved for the treatment of fluorouracil(Drug information on fluorouracil) (5-FU)-resistant colorectal cancer,[1] opening a new chapter in chemotherapeutic radiation sensitization. The combination of CPT-11 with irradiation can build onto the successful radiation sensitization trials with 5-FU[2]. Both 5-FU and irinotecan have cytotoxic activity against S-phase cells; they have a defined role in the treatment of colorectal cancer;[3-5] and they are radiation sensitizers (Table 1). Radiation sensitization with these agents is dose- and schedule-dependent,[6,7] based on data from preclinical models and clinical trials. New laboratory data on the camptothecins suggest that the timing of administration may allow for dose escalation and may be an additional important factor in the design of irinotecan radiosensitizer trials.[8]

Camptothecins With Irradiation: Background

The molecular basis for the lethal effects of ionizing radiation alone include the production of single- and double-strand breaks in DNA.[9] Repair of x-ray and/or chemotherapy-induced genomic damage can require topoisomerase I, which is widely utilized in DNA metabolism.[10] In the presence of camptothecin, camptothecin/topoisomerase I/DNA complexes become stabilized because the 5'-phosphoryl terminus of an enzyme-catalyzed DNA single-strand break is bound covalently to a tyrosine of topoisomerase I. Irradiation creates many single-strand breaks and these sites can be attacked by topoisomerase I in the presence of camptothecin. The rate of topoisomerase I binding to nicked DNA is also more rapid (increased by factor of 800 to 1,000) than its binding to undamaged supercoiled DNA.[11,12] Stabilized complexes interact with the advancing replication fork during S phase or during unscheduled DNA replication after genomic stress. The result of the presence of camptothecin is the conversion of single-strand breaks into irreversible DNA double-strand breaks, resulting in cell death.[11-13] Unrepaired DNA damage can be recognized by the p53 damage-sensing pathway, initiating and possibly amplifying the apoptotic pathway of cell death.[14,15]

Camptothecins can also modulate apoptosis independent of DNA synthesis in postmitotic neurons[16] and confluence-arrested cell cultures,[13] as well as in actively proliferating cell cultures[17] and in murine tumors in vivo.[18] High levels of topoisomerase I are associated with a high frequency of cleavable complex formation,[19] and high topoisomerase I levels have been detected in surgical specimens from colonic, ovarian, esophageal, breast, stomach, and lung cancers, malignant melanoma, and in cultures from non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and leukemia cells.[20]

One basis for selective camptothecin toxicity in malignant cells as compared with normal tissues may be related to these enzyme levels. An additional biological basis for selective camptothecin activity may be related to the low pH found in cancers, which stabilizes the closed (active) lactone ring.[21] Another effect of the camptothecin/topoisomerase I/DNA cleavable complexes is on the repair of potentially lethal damage in the DNA of plateau-phase cells.[22]

Combined camptothecin and irradiation effects appear to be determined by position in the cell cycle. Camptothecins are considered S-phase agents because selective cytotoxicity is observed in the S phase[20,21,23] with relative sparing of G1-, G2-, and M-phase cells following pulse exposure to camptothecin.[24] Elimination by aphidocolin of the camptothecin cytotoxicity and radiation sensitization is consistent with its S-phase effects.[23] Additional contributions to radiation sensitization may be related to synchronizing effects of irradiation that preferentially kill G2-M cells, leaving S-phase cells intact and subject to attack by camptothecin treatment.[17,24]

Dose, Schedule, and Time of Day

In our laboratory we have examined the use of irradiation with the camptothecin analog 9-aminocamptothecin (9AC), delivered in different doses, schedules, and at different times of the day.[7,8] We determined an optimal dose and timing of irradiation with 9AC in vivo using the MCa-4 mouse mammary carcinoma.[7] For example, 9AC given with daily fractionated irradiation resulted in dose modification factors of 2.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.0 to 3.1) and 3.7 (95% CI = 3.1 to 4.6) in animals treated with 0.5 and 2 mg/kg 9AC twice a week for 2 weeks, respectively.

In experiments in which the total dose was kept constant at 4 mg/kg, 9AC was more effective when given either twice or four times a week compared with once a week (dose modification factors of 2.8 [95% CI = 2.2 to 3.9], 2.6 [95% CI = 2.0 to 3.6], and 1.7 [95% CI = 1.3 to 2.4], respectively). The dose modification with single-dose irradiation and 9AC is markedly reduced (dose modification factor = 1.11). These results indicate that, in this murine tumor, fractionation of both the radiosensitizer dose and irradiation produces greater effect compared with large single doses used less frequently. Combined camptothecin and irradiation can also severely affect the small intestine; we have shown in the animal model that this is related to dose-dependent loss of the mucosal layer of the small intestinal villi.[25]

We also examined the acute toxicity of 9AC administered to rodents at different times over a 24-hour period. Several phase I and II trials using chronoregulated chemotherapy have shown that drug toxicity depends on the time of day of administration, which provides strong support for a relationship between trough values of gastrointestinal epithelial cell DNA synthesis rates and reduced toxicity to anti-S-phase chemotherapeutic agents.[26-28]

Based on the hypothesis that chronomodulated delivery could be done at a time when the systemic dose would be better tolerated, we showed that the 9AC dose could be escalated by approximately 30% when administered at the time it could be best tolerated.[8] Others have also shown that irinotecan is less toxic (less total body weight loss and acute mortality) during the animal’s resting phase when proliferation in the gastrointestinal tract is low.[29,30] These data underscore the need for a clinical trial of camptothecin as a radiosensitizer with chronomodulated administration in order to ameliorate acute toxicity.

Camptothecins With Irradiation: Clinical Studies

Chemoradiation is based on cytotoxic cooperation between systemic chemotherapy and fractionated irradiation. The superiority of fractionated irradiation has long been evident because it spares late effects. When fractionated irradiation is combined with S-phase-specific agents, a form of "accelerated treatment" is produced whereby the dose-limiting toxicities are not only late morbidity of irradiation (eg, fibrosis and necrosis), but also enhanced acute toxicity expressed in the rapidly proliferating cell compartments.[31] The pattern of dose application used in camptothecin radiation sensitization trials could thus play a significant role in success or failure.

Irinotecan is a semisynthetic derivative of camptothecin that has shown a wide range of antineoplastic activity in vitro and in vivo. Treatment schedules with irinotecan alone have varied: in the United States, 125 to 150 mg/m2 once a week for 4 weeks followed by a 2-week drug-free interval; in Europe, 350 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks; or in Japan, 100 mg/m2/wk or 150 mg/m2 every 2 weeks.[32] Other intermittent treatment schedules using cytokine support for neutropenia, or intensive loperamide(Drug information on loperamide) for moderate to severe diarrhea, have also been reported.[33] These irinotecan regimens in patients with colorectal cancer have resulted in median response durations ranging from 5.6 to 10.6 months, disease stabilization in 30% to 71%,[33] and response rates of 26% to 32% in previously untreated patients.[34,35] Lower response rates have been reported for 5-FU-refractory patients (7% to 21%).[1] Diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting are common toxicities; other side effects include asthenia, abdominal pain, leukopenia, and neutropenia.

Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
IMAGE IQ

A 52-Year-Old Man Presents With an Erythematous Lesion
Cesar Moran, MD , May 22, 2013

A 52-year-old man presented with an erythematous lesion in the axilla of unknown duration. Surgical excision was performed. What is your diagnosis?

More Image IQs 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Five Steps to Improving Patient Access
Judy Capko,  May 21, 2013
Patient access is getting increased attention through reform initiatives. Here are five steps you can take to make sure patients get appropriate access to care in your office.
Growing HIPAA Threat – Ignore Windows XP at Your Own Peril
Marion K. Jenkins,  May 21, 2013
Chances are good that you have some major ticking software time bombs lurking in your medical practice's computer environment, namely Windows XP and Server 2003.
Finding Physician Work-Life Balance in the Small Moments
Jennifer Frank, MD,  May 21, 2013
At my practice and at home, things are always busy. There's laundry or homework, or a patient with needs.
Three Areas to Reduce Costs at Your Medical Practice
Greg Mertz,  May 19, 2013
By taking a hard look at reducing costs for staffing, overhead, and technology at your medical practice, you may see increased physician compensation.
Dos and Don’ts for Starting a Physician Blog
Michael Woo-Ming, MD,  May 18, 2013
Starting a physician blog can provide your medical practice with marketing benefits, but it's important to do it right.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • A 49-Year-Old Woman Develops Thickened and Bound-Down Skin
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Therapy Innovations
  • A 52-Year-Old Man Presents With an Erythematous Lesion
  • Bone Metastases
  • Palliative Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Bone Metastases Improves Quality of Life
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Financial Toxicity, Part II: How Can We Help With the Burden of Treatment-Related Costs?
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • Conflicts of Interest in Medicine: What About Ties to Payers?
  • Planning Treatment for Women With Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • Cancer Metabolism as a Therapeutic Target
  • Study: Cholesterol Drugs Reduced Risk of Prostate Cancer Death
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter



CancerNetwork on Facebook

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy