CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home »

ONCOLOGY. Vol. 15 No. 9
Pages: 1  2  
Next
Clinical Trials Referral Resource 

Current Clinical Trials of Epothilone B Analog (BMS-247550)

By A. Dimitrios Colevas, MD, Pamela J. West, and Bruce D. Cheson, MD
National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland

| September 1, 2001

BMS-247550 is a methyl, semi-synthetic analog of the natural product epothilone B. Provided to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) by Bristol-Myers Squibb, BMS-247550 was chosen for clinical development because it demonstrated antitumor activity in paclitaxel(Drug information on paclitaxel) (Taxol)-sensitive, paclitaxel-insensitive, and paclitaxel-resistant human tumor models. The first NCI-sponsored clinical trial of BMS-247550 was initiated in February 2000.

Clinical Trials Referral Resource is designed to serve as a ready reference for oncologists to help identify clinical trials that might be suitable for their patients. We hope it will also enhance accrual to clinical trials by informing practicing oncologists of ongoing protocols. Currently in the United States less than 10% of eligible adult patients are entered into clinical trials. The result is a delay in answering important therapeutic and scientific questions and disseminating therapeutic advances to the general oncology community.

It should be emphasized that including a specific trial does not imply that it is more important than another trial. Among the criteria for selection are that the trial is addressing an important question and is not expected to close in the immediate future (less than 1 year), and that initial staging or laboratory tests required for patient eligibility are widely practiced and available. Information on other protocols can be accessed via Physician’s Data Query (PDQ).*

We emphasize that this is an attempt to encourage referral of patients to these trials. We are specifically not soliciting additional members for the cooperative groups, nor are we suggesting how practicing oncologists should be treating patients who are not in a study.

This month’s installment of Clinical Trials Referral Resource is devoted to clinical trials of epothilone B analog (BMS-247550).

For patient entry information, see the individual trials.

* PDQ is a comprehensive database service provided by the National Cancer Institute’s International Cancer Information Center and Office of Cancer Communications for retrieval of cancer treatment information, including peer-reviewed statements on treatment options, supportive care, screening, and prevention; and an international clinical trials registry. For more information on PDQ, Internet access is available at http://cancernet.nci.nih.gov/pdqfull.html, or contact the Cancer Information Service offices (1-800-4-CANCER).

Taxanes represent one of the most effective classes of anticancer therapeutics; however, many human cancers either do not respond to or become resistant to taxane-based therapy. Therefore, screening programs have sought microtubule-stabilizing compounds with a broader range of activity and/or activity against taxane-refractory cancers. Fermentation products in the culture broth of the cellulose-degrading myxobacteria Sorangium cellulosum were found to have antifungal and cytotoxic activity. German investigators isolated epothilones A and B from this culture broth and elucidated their structures.[1,2]

Bollag and colleagues found that the epothilones A and B induce polymerization of tubulin and enhance microtubule stability.[3] The epothilones compete with the taxanes for binding to tubulin, suggesting a single pharmacophore for these two classes of agents. The epothilones’ microtubule stabilization causes mitotic arrest and therefore, precipitates cell-cycle arrest at the G2/M transition, with resultant apoptosis.[4] The epothilones, unlike the taxanes, retain their activity against P-glycoprotein-expressing, multiple drug-resistant tumors and cell lines as well as tumors resistant to the taxanes based on tubulin mutations.[3]

Epothilone B, unlike paclitaxel, does not elicit endotoxin-signaling pathways in murine macrophages, yet the effects of microtubule stabilization are preserved. Therefore, the production of proinflammatory cytokines and nitric oxide seen with paclitaxel has not been observed with epothilone B.[5] These preclinical data raise the possibility that the antitumor effects of paclitaxel may be preserved in epothilone B, whereas some adverse reactions—such as arthralgias and myalgias—associated with a proinflammatory state, may not.

Investigators at Bristol-Myers Squibb conducted an extensive screening program of more than 300 semisynthetic analogs of epothilones A and B. BMS-247550, a lactam analog of epothilone B, emerged as the leading candidate for further development, having outperformed paclitaxel in a series of preclinical tumor models.[6]

Preclinical Studies

BMS-247550 has demonstrated a broad spectrum of activity against a panel of tumor lines in vitro, including human ovarian, breast, prostate, colon, lung, and epithelial cancer lines and leukemia cell lines. Median inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were between 1.4 and 34.5 nM, based on a 72-hour exposure. BMS-247550 retained its activity against paclitaxel-resistant lines, compared to paclitaxel-sensitive lines. Tubulin polymerization assays demonstrated a 2.5-fold greater potency for BMS-247550 over paclitaxel. BMS-247550 causes virtually complete cell-cycle arrest in G2/M at 7.5 nM, which is approximately the mean IC90 in vitro.[6]

Mouse tumor models, including models of mouse fibrosarcoma and human pancreatic, ovarian, colon, and breast cancers have shown that log cell kill of BMS-247550 is equal or superior to that of paclitaxel in both paclitaxel-sensitive and -resistant tumors in virtually all cases, when the drugs are administered according to their respective optimal doses and schedules.

Preclinical data suggest that the efficacy of BMS-247550 may be schedule-dependent. A study of A2780 (ovarian) tumors in mice demonstrated a less frequent dosing schedule, allowing for higher doses to be administered, with a maximum tolerated dose of 16 mg/kg per injection on an every-4-days × 3 schedule vs 6.3 mg/kg per injection on an every-2-days × 5 schedule.

Similar results were demonstrated in an HCT116 (colon) model: A maximum tolerated dose of 24 mg/kg per injection on an every-8-days × 2 schedule vs 6.3 mg/kg per injection on an every-2-days × 5 schedule. In both of these models, the antitumor effects were markedly superior in the mice treated on the intermittent schedules as well.[6] In two other studies in the Pat-7 (pancreas) and HCT116/VM46 (paclitaxel-resistant colon) tumors, the efficacy of two IV treatment schedules (every 2 days × 5 and every 4 days × 3) were compared, and in both cases, the two regimens yielded essentially equivalent antitumor activities.

BMS-247550 is bioavailable orally. Experiments with the HC116 (colon) mouse tumor model have demonstrated that the antitumor activity of oral BMS-247550 is identical to that of the intravenous regimen.

Clinical Studies

Phase I studies of BMS-247550 evaluating three schedules are ongoing and have been reported in abstract form.

Adverse reactions attributed to BMS-247550 have included neutropenia, arthralgia/myalgia, fatigue, weakness, constipation, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, rash, alopecia, and peripheral neuropathy. Dose-limiting toxicities on the every-21-day schedule are neutropenia, neuropathy, and arthralgia/myalgia, and the maximum tolerated dose on this schedule is 50 mg/m² per cycle. The maximum tolerated doses of the every-7-day and 5 × daily every-21-day schedules have not yet been defined, but the patterns of toxicity are similar thus far, with the possible exception of diminished neuropathy on the daily × 5 days schedule. BMS-247550 is administered in Cremaphor EL solution, and hypersensitivity reactions have been observed in patients who were not premedicated. There have been no reports of clinically relevant hypersensitivity in patients receiving H1 and H2 blockers as premedication.[7-11]

Preliminary pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies in humans demonstrate a wide volume of distribution for BMS-247550 (399-1157 L/m²) and a terminal half-life of approximately 1 to 2 days, with a clearance of 230 to 423 mL/min/m2.[12] Enhanced tubulin polymerization in peripheral blood mononuclear cells has been seen at several dose levels. Plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) values appear to be proportional to dose.

Preliminary evidence of antitumor activity has been reported on all schedules under investigation and has included the following tumor types: ovarian, colon, breast, melanoma, non-small-cell lung, anal, and head and neck cancers.[7,9-11]

The Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) at the NCI is sponsoring a broad range of phase I and II clinical trials of BMS-247550, both as a single agent and in combination with other agents on various schedules. Bristol-Myers Squibb is sponsoring trials in patients with breast, colorectal, gastric, melanoma, and non-small-cell lung cancer. The following list includes approved and/or active clinical trials examining treatments with the epothilone B analog BMS-247550, which are being sponsored by CTEP. Information about these studies can be obtained from the principal investigator or the contacts listed for each trial, or from A. Dimitrios Colevas, MD, at CTEP (colevasd@ctep.nci.nih.gov), 301-435-9128.

Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
IMAGE IQ

Lower Back Pain in an Elderly Man With a History of Localized Prostate Cancer
James B. Yu, MD1 , May 17, 2013

A 70-year-old man with a history of localized prostate cancer treated with whole-pelvis radiation therapy with a boost to the prostate, in conjunction with androgen deprivation therapy 7 years prior, presented with lower back pain. A bone scan revealed an area of activity in the sacrum. What is the most likely diagnosis?

More Image IQs 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Primary Care Can't Thrive Without Nurse Practitioners
Courtney H. Lyder, ND,  May 17, 2013
With a projected shortfall of primary-care physicians, it's time for alternate solutions to patient care. Nurse practitioners are one logical remedy.
VWhat Physicians Can Learn from the Allscripts EHR Lawsuit
Marisa Torrieri,  May 16, 2013
Lawsuit prompts question: What should physicians do to ensure they end up with a great EHR instead of buyer’s remorse?
Eight Ways ICD-9 Will Still Matter to Medical Practices
Brenda Edwards, CPC,  May 15, 2013
What should your medical practice do with your ICD-9-CM book after October 1, 2014? Keep it.
Seven Ways Technology Can Speed Up Patient Collections
Cheyenne Brinson,  May 15, 2013
Failing to adopt widely available billing and collections technology can cost medical practices big. Here's how to do it right.
Four Reasons Private Medical Practice is Becoming Extinct
Carol Stryker,  May 15, 2013
It’s becoming increasingly difficult for private medical practices to thrive. Here’s what’s driving the trend toward consolidation.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • Skin Lesions
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • Palliative Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Bone Metastases Improves Quality of Life
  • Staying Fit Could Ward Off Lung and Colorectal Cancer for Middle-Age Men
  • Obesity Impairs Efficacy of L-Asparaginase in Leukemia Treatment
  • New AUA Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Screening
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Financial Toxicity, Part II: How Can We Help With the Burden of Treatment-Related Costs?
  • Patient Quality of Life Endpoints in Oncology Trials, Part II
  • Who's Coding Whom?
  • “How Do I Say This Nicely? Your Oncologist Wasn't Following Guidelines”
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • Cancer Metabolism as a Therapeutic Target
  • Study: Cholesterol Drugs Reduced Risk of Prostate Cancer Death
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • ONS: Safe Handling of Chemotherapy
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter



CancerNetwork on Facebook

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy