CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
 
CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
PATIENTS
NURSES
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home »

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 14 No. 12
 

Outcomes in Early-Stage Hodgkin's Disease Are Not Compromised When Treatment Intensity Is Reduced

December 1, 2005

DENVER-Among patients with early-stage Hodgkin's disease (HD) without adverse features, outcomes with combined modality regimens are still very good when chemotherapy is reduced by half or radiation therapy is reduced by a third, according to interim results of a randomized trial. Rolf P. Müller, MD, head of the Department of Radiation Oncology at the University of Cologne, Germany, presented the study findings at the 47th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (abstract 2).

The study-the German Hodgkin's Study Group HD-10 trial-expanded on the results of the group's preceding trials and on other studies testing combined-modality treatment and the feasibility of reducing treatment intensity, Dr. Müller explained. The group's HD-7 trial in patients with early-stage Hodgkin's disease showed good efficacy with less intense chemotherapy in combination with radiation therapy, and the HD-8 trial in patients with early but unfavorable disease showed that 30 Gy of radiation therapy worked as well when delivered to the involved field as when delivered to the extended field. "But still," he noted, "the optimal chemotherapy regimen and the number of cycles were not clear, and the optimal radiotherapy dose has also not been fixed."

The new trial enrolled patients who had clinical stage I or II Hodgkin's disease without adverse features (a large mediastinal mass, extranodal disease, high erythrocyte sedimentation rate, or three or more lymph node areas involved). The patients were randomized in a 2-by-2 factorial design to chemotherapy-either two or four cycles of ABVD (Adriamycin, bleomycin(Drug information on bleomycin), vinblastine(Drug information on vinblastine), and dacarbazine(Drug information on dacarbazine))-and then to involved-field radiation therapy-either 20 Gy or 30 Gy.

Interim Analysis

The interim analysis included 1,107 patients who had a median follow-up of 41 months. With respect to chemotherapy toxicity, patients receiving four cycles of ABVD had higher incidences of WHO grade 3 or 4 toxicities than their counterparts receiving only two cycles; differences were significant for leukopenia, hair loss, and infection, Dr. Müller said. With respect to radiation therapy toxicity, the incidence of WHO grade 3 or 4 toxicity was low overall (3%) and mainly accounted for by dysphagia and mucositis.

Second cancers occurred in 23 patients (about 2%), with no difference by treatment group. The second cancers were AML (2 patients, 9% of these cancers), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (14 patients, 61%), and solid tumors (7 patients, 30%).

According to Dr. Müller, rates of adherence to the two chemotherapy protocols were similar, as were rates of adherence to the two radiation therapy protocols. Three months after chemotherapy, almost 98% of the patients had a complete remission or a complete remission with residual changes (less than 1.5 cm mass on imaging); 3 months after radiation therapy, the percentage was 99%.

Overall, 2.4% of patients have died, Dr. Müller noted. The leading causes of death were Hodgkin's disease (22% of deaths), toxicity of the primary chemotherapy (22%), secondary cancers (15%), and toxicity of the salvage chemotherapy regimen (11%).

For the entire study population, at 4 years, the rate of freedom from treatment failure (the primary endpoint) was 94%. It did not differ for patients receiving two or four cycles of chemotherapy (93% and 94%, respectively) or for patients receiving 20 or 30 Gy of radiation therapy (93% and 94%).

At 4 years, the rate of overall survival was 97% for the whole study population. It did not differ for patients receiving two or four cycles of chemotherapy (98% and 99%, respectively) or for patients receiving 20 or 30 Gy of radiation therapy (98% and 97%).

"Based on the results of HD-7 and HD-8, we can state that combined-modality treatment is a standard, and HD-10 shows no significant difference in freedom from treatment failure and overall survival between the treatment arms-neither for chemotherapy nor for radiation therapy," Dr. Müller concluded.

He added that the ongoing HD-13 trial is testing the feasibility of further reducing the intensity of chemotherapy, with patients receiving two cycles of ABVD, ABV, AVD, or AV, each followed by 30 Gy of involved-field radiotherapy. 

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

  • Bladder Cancer
  • Bone Metastases
  • Breast Cancer
  • CML
  • Colorectal Cancer
  • End-of-Life
  • GIST
  • Genetics Genomics
  • Gynecologic Cancers
  • Head & Neck Cancer
  • Integrative Oncology
  • Leukemia
  • Lung Cancer
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Nausea & Vomiting
  • Palliative Care
  • Pancreatic Cancer
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy
  • Prostate Cancer
  • RCC
  • Skin Cancer
  • Triple-Negative Breast
  • Testicular Cancer


More Topics 

 
PUBLICATIONS
ONCOLOGY Journal ONCOLOGY Nurse Edition Journal Cancer Management: A Multidisciplinary Approach

ONCOLOGY:
Perspectives on Best Practices

ONCOLOGY:
Nurse Edition

CANCER
MANAGEMENT
:
A Multidisciplinary
Approach


 
IMAGE IQ

This patient is at increased risk for which type of neoplasia?

A 28-year-old, slightly obese Caucasian woman presented with a long-standing history of intermittently painful “bumps” on both shoulders and her upper back.

 

More Image IQs:

 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Tax Schemes Every Physician Should Avoid
Ike Devji, JD, January 31, 2012
The next 60 days marks the final push to sell physicians across the United States tax plans of both good and questionable value.
Boosting Collections at Your Medical Practice: Whose Job Is It?
P.J. Cloud-Moulds, January 28, 2012
Embrace the relationship between your billing company and your medical practice staff.
Managing Difficult Medical Practice Employees
Shelly K. Schwartz, January 27, 2012
Tips for transforming immature staff members into great employees.
Prevent Physician Distraction When Using mHealth Technology
Aubrey Westgate, January 25, 2012
As more and more physicians use handheld mobile technology in their day-to-day work, some critics are raising concerns about “distracted doctoring.”
Can That Applicant Do the Job at Your Medical Practice?
Karen Zupko, January 25, 2012
If like many communities, yours has significant numbers of non-English speaking people with whom neither you nor your staff are able to converse, your practice is at a serious disadvantage.
 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Head and Neck Tumors
  • 46-Year-Old Woman Presents With Difficulty in Ambulation, and Swelling and Discoloration of Both Eyelids
  • Optimizing Outcomes of Advanced Prostate Cancer: Drug Sequencing and Novel Therapeutic Approaches
  • A 28-Year-Old Woman Presents With a Long-Standing History of Intermittently Painful “Bumps” on Both Her Shoulders and Upper Back
  • Controversies in Oncologist-Patient Communication: A Nuanced Approach to Autonomy, Culture, and Paternalism
  • Evolution of Treatment Options for Patients With CRPC and Bone Metastases: Bone-Targeted Agents That Go Beyond Palliation of Symptoms to Improve Overall Survival
  • Ending the Shortage of Generic Oncology Drugs
  • Processed and Red Meat Consumption Linked to Slight Increase in Risk of Pancreatic Cancer
  • New Mutation May Act as Driver in Subset of Lung Cancer Patients
  • Could Aspirin Be a Viable Adjuvant Treatment for Cancer?
  • Advances and New Research in the Treatment of Kidney Cancer
  • New Way to Predict Prostate Cancer Severity—Size of Prostate
  • Vismodegib Granted FDA Approval for Treatment of Basal Cell Carcinoma
  • FDA Grants Approval to Axitinib for the Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
  • Why BRAF-Mutated Colorectal Cancers Don't Respond to BRAF Inhibitors
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • When to Treat Myelodysplastic Syndromes
  • Are We Ready for Neoadjuvant Therapy in Potentially Resectable Pancreatic Cancer?
  • ASCO 2011: A Paradigm Shift in the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer
  • PSA Screening for Prostate Cancer Put Into Question By the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
  • When to Treat Myelodysplastic Syndromes
  • ASCO 2011: A Paradigm Shift in the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer
  • Are We Ready for Neoadjuvant Therapy in Potentially Resectable Pancreatic Cancer?
  • Evolving Therapeutic Paradigms for Advanced Prostate Cancer
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
JOB LISTINGS

Post a job

Powered by SearchMedica Jobs



CancerNetwork on Facebook

 

CancerNetwork | CME LLC | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2012 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy