CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home »

ONCOLOGY. Vol. 15 No. 11 9
Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

European Experience With Oral Solution and Intravenous Itraconazole

By

Michael Potter, MD, PhD
Department of Hematology, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom

| November 1, 2001
The availability of an improved oral solution and an intravenous (IV) formulation of itraconazole (Sporanox) promises to have an effect on prevention and treatment of fungal infection in immunocompromised patients. Use of itraconazole in neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies has been evaluated in a number of European studies. Treatment with IV followed by oral itraconazole resulted in response or stable disease in two-thirds of patients with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Empiric treatment with IV followed by oral solution itraconazole was at least as effective as, and significantly less toxic than, amphotericin B. Several studies of oral solution prophylaxis indicate effectiveness in prevention of fungal infection. Oral solution and IV itraconazole are useful in a variety of situations in prophylaxis, empiric therapy, and treatment of probable/confirmed infection. Itraconazole exhibits a broad spectrum of activity against Aspergillus and Candida species. It has potential advantages over fluconazole (Diflucan), which does not exhibit in vitro activity against Aspergillus and most non-albicans Candida species, and amphotericin B, which is associated with a high incidence of toxicity. Aggressive use of itraconazole and amphotericin B preparations in treatment of fungal infection at Royal Free Hospital may have reduced mortality associated with aspergillosis. [ONCOLOGY 15(Suppl 9):27-32, 2001]

Itraconazale (Sporanox) has been used in a number of European studies in patients with neutropenia and hematologic malignancies. These studies have shown that itraconazale has a promising effect in both the prevention and treatment of fungal infection when administered intravenously followed by oral doses.

Efficacy and Safety Study

In a multicenter, open-label, single- group study, Caillot and colleagues[1] evaluated the efficacy and safety of itraconazole(Drug information on itraconazole) in 31 immunocompromised adult patients with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Of the 31 patients participating in the study, 90% had hematologic malignancy, 7% had graft-vs-host disease, and 3% had AIDS; 61% of the patients were neutropenic.

The study also assessed plasma levels of itraconazole and the active metabolite hydroxy-itraconazole to determine the pharmacokinetics of the intravenous (IV)/oral capsule dosing regimen that was used.

Aspergillosis was diagnosed on the basis of positive tissue biopsy, culture or direct examination of percutaneous lung aspirate, presence of new or progressive infiltrates on x-ray or computed tomography (CT) with positive sputum or bronchoalveolar lavage or positive nasal swab (in neutropenic patients), or when bronchoscopy/lavage and CT scans showed typical halo or air crescent signs.

Dosage and Response

Treatment consisted of itraconazole IV at 200 mg twice daily for 4 days and 200 mg once daily for 12 days, followed by oral itraconazole capsules 200 mg twice daily for 12 weeks. Outcomes were assessed at day 14 and at 14 weeks. All 31 patients received IV itraconazole for a median of 14 days, and 26 received oral itraconazole for a median of 78.5 days.

Response (defined as resolution or major improvement in all signs and symptoms) at day 14 was observed in 38% of patients, with response or stable disease being observed in 81%. By the end of study treatment, response was observed in 48% of patients, with response or stable disease being observed in 68%.

Plasma Drug Concentrations

Figure 1 shows plasma drug concentrations, assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection, during the course of the Caillot study. Therapeutic trough plasma levels (> 250 ng/mL) were obtained in 91% of the patients within 2 days of IV treatment and in all patients within 1 week of IV treatment. Therapeutic levels exceeding the minimum effective concentration were maintained after changing from IV to oral treatment. In total, adverse events were reported in 42% of patients during IV treatment and 35% during oral treatment. Treatment was discontinued due to adverse effects in seven patients; two related to the IV preparation (rigors and rashes) and five related to the oral preparation (gastrointestinal side effects).

Empiric Therapy in Neutropenic Patients

DeBeule and colleagues[2] performed a multicenter, open-label, randomized study to assess the pharmacokinetics of an IV/oral solution itraconazole regimen and to compare the effects of itraconazole and amphotericin B(Drug information on amphotericin b) as empiric therapy for fever of unknown origin in neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies.

Methods

The study enrolled a total of 394 adults with hematologic malignancies with neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count < 500,000 × 10³/L) expected to last for 7 days and persistent fever (> 38°C) despite 3 to 7 days of broad-spectrum antimicrobial treatment. A total of 384 patients received at least one dose of study medication and were included for safety analysis. Evaluation of efficacy was based on an intention to treat 360 randomized patients who satisfied the full inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Underlying diagnoses were similar in the two treatment groups, with 56% of patients in each having acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). The treatment groups were well-matched for risk factors, with similar proportions of patients undergoing first treatment or having first or second or subsequent relapse, similar proportions undergoing autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT) or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation, and similar proportions using corticosteroids, exhibiting fungal colonization of the digestive tract, and exhibiting mucositis. The median duration of neutropenia was approximately 9 days in both groups.

Dosage and Response

Treatments consisted of itraconazole IV 200 mg twice daily for 2 days and 200 mg once daily for 5 to 12 days followed by oral solution 400 mg once daily from day 15 to day 28 or amphotericin B IV at 0.7 to 1.0 mg/kg/d for 28 days.

Patients in the itraconazole group received IV treatment for a median of 8.5 days; 65 patients switched to oral itraconazole for a median of 7 days after a median of 9 days of IV treatment. Patients in the amphotericin B group received IV amphotericin B for a median of 7 days; the mean amphotericin B dose was 0.71 mg/kg/d.

Treatment response was defined as absence of fever for 3 days and a recovery from neutropenia for a minimum of 2 consecutive days. Failure was defined as documented deep fungal infection or highly suggestive CT findings, documented bacterial or viral infection responsible for fever, death due to any cause within 3 days of starting study treatment, persistent fever at the end of neutropenia or at day 28, persistence of signs and symptoms of fungal infection irrespective of presence of fever, fever requiring a change in the antifungal regimen, or discontinuation of study medication due to poor tolerance.

Outcomes

In total, 24 (13%) of the itraconazole patients and 46 (25%) of the amphotericin B patients were considered unevaluable on the basis of receiving treatment for 3 or fewer days. Failure occurred in 72 (39%) and 70 (38%) of the intraconazole and amphotericin B recipients, respectively, and response occurred in 48% and 38%, respectively. It was calculated that itraconazole was at least as effective as amphotericin B treatment (P = .001, Fleiss test).

A further analysis based on the composite end point[3] indicated response in 53% of the itraconazole recipients and in 46% of the amphotericin B recipients (P = .047, Fleiss test).

Severe adverse events occurred in 19% of the itraconazole group and 34% of the amphotericin B group (P = .001); 19% and 38% (P = .001), respectively, withdrew from treatment due to adverse effects. Adverse events considered related to study therapy occurred in 5% of the itraconazole group and in 54% of the amphotericin B group (P < .001). Nephrotoxicity (defined as serum creatinine > 2 times baseline level) occurred in 5% and 24% (P < .001), respectively; mean creatinine clearance in the treatment groups is shown in Figure 2.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation showed that therapeutic plasma itraconazole levels were achieved in 97% of patients within 3 days of starting treatment. As shown in Figure 3, mean trough plasma concentrations increased through day 15 and were somewhat reduced after initiation of oral dosing but remained well over minimum therapeutic levels.

Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
IMAGE IQ

A 52-Year-Old Man Presents With an Erythematous Lesion
Cesar Moran, MD , May 22, 2013

A 52-year-old man presented with an erythematous lesion in the axilla of unknown duration. Surgical excision was performed. What is your diagnosis?

More Image IQs 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Five Steps to Improving Patient Access
Judy Capko,  May 21, 2013
Patient access is getting increased attention through reform initiatives. Here are five steps you can take to make sure patients get appropriate access to care in your office.
Growing HIPAA Threat – Ignore Windows XP at Your Own Peril
Marion K. Jenkins,  May 21, 2013
Chances are good that you have some major ticking software time bombs lurking in your medical practice's computer environment, namely Windows XP and Server 2003.
Finding Physician Work-Life Balance in the Small Moments
Jennifer Frank, MD,  May 21, 2013
At my practice and at home, things are always busy. There's laundry or homework, or a patient with needs.
Three Areas to Reduce Costs at Your Medical Practice
Greg Mertz,  May 19, 2013
By taking a hard look at reducing costs for staffing, overhead, and technology at your medical practice, you may see increased physician compensation.
Dos and Don’ts for Starting a Physician Blog
Michael Woo-Ming, MD,  May 18, 2013
Starting a physician blog can provide your medical practice with marketing benefits, but it's important to do it right.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • The ABCDEs of Moles and Melanomas
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Therapy Innovations
  • A 52-Year-Old Man Presents With an Erythematous Lesion
  • Bone Metastases
  • Palliative Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Bone Metastases Improves Quality of Life
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Financial Toxicity, Part II: How Can We Help With the Burden of Treatment-Related Costs?
  • Patient Quality of Life Endpoints in Oncology Trials, Part II
  • Who's Coding Whom?
  • “How Do I Say This Nicely? Your Oncologist Wasn't Following Guidelines”
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • Cancer Metabolism as a Therapeutic Target
  • Study: Cholesterol Drugs Reduced Risk of Prostate Cancer Death
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • ONS: Safe Handling of Chemotherapy
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter



CancerNetwork on Facebook

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy