CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home »

ONCOLOGY. Vol. 12 No. 8
 

ODAC Recommends Approval of Topotecan for Second- Line Treatment of Small-Cell Lung Cancer

August 1, 1998

The FDA’s Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) recommended the approval of topotecan(Drug information on topotecan) hydrochloride for injection (Hycamtin) for the second-line treatment of sensitive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

The favorable recommendation was based on a review of data from four clinical trials conducted in patients with relapsed SCLC. In a randomized, phase III, comparative clinical trial, topotecan as a single agent showed comparable efficacy to CAV (cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, and vincristine), a triple-drug combination therapy commonly used for the treatment of relapsed SCLC. Median survival and time to progression were comparable for both treatment groups. Topotecan is currently approved by the FDA for use in the treatment of ovarian cancer after failure of initial or subsequent chemotherapy.

"Since most small-cell lung cancer patients will eventually relapse and become difficult to treat, there is a need for new agents such as topotecan that can be used to treat patients, particularly those who have failed first-line therapy. There is currently no standard treatment for this malignancy, which is one of the most deadly cancers among both men and women," said Joan Schiller, MD, associate professor, University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center in Madison, Wisconsin, and the lead US study investigator for the phase III clinical trial. "Results from several clinical trials involving patients treated with topotecan have been very encouraging."

Phase III Trial Results

The panel based its decision, in part, on a large phase III, randomized clinical trial that was conducted at 44 centers in North America, Europe, and South Africa and involved 211 patients who had relapsed at least 60 days after their initial treatment. Patients received either an intravenous infusion of topotecan (1.5 mg/m²) as a single agent for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks or CAV (cyclophosphamide, 1,000 mg/m², Adriamycin, 45 mg/m², and vincristine, 2 mg) administered intravenously on day 1 every 3 weeks.

A greater percentage of topotecan-treated than CAV-treated patients responded to treatment (24.3% vs 18.3%), although this difference was not statistically significant. Tumors were assessed by radiologic evaluation and required independent confirmation. Median survival and time to progression were comparable in the two treatment groups.

More topotecan-treated patients than CAV recipients reported improvement in disease-related symptoms. A significantly higher percentage of patients who were treated with topotecan vs CAV reported an improvement in the following symptoms: shortness of breath (P = .002), fatigue (P = .032), hoarseness (P = .043), and anorexia (P = .042). Improvement was defined as improvement over baseline sustained for at least two consecutive courses. In addition, significantly fewer topotecan-treated patients (P = .023) experienced interference with daily activities.

Of the other four symptoms measured, improvements in three symptoms (chest pain, cough, insomnia) were numerically superior for topotecan-treated patients, while improvement in hemoptysis was numerically superior for patients treated with CAV, although this symptom was not very frequent in either group.

Data from Open-Label, Noncomparative Trials

Data were also reviewed from three open-label, noncomparative trials involving 319 patients with recurrent or progressive SCLC cancer after treatment with first-line chemotherapy. These three studies supported the results of the phase III study.

"We are extremely pleased with the committee’s positive decision today," said Scott Z. Fields, MD, group director, Oncology, Clinical Research, Development and Medical affairs North America, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, developers of topotecan. "Topotecan has been one of the most extensively studied new agents for the treatment of relapsed small-cell lung cancer, a very deadly disease for which there are limited options."

As with many chemotherapeutic agents, the main side effect experienced by topotecan in clinical trials was neutropenia, which was predictable, noncumulative, and manageable. Nonhematologic side effects were generally mild. The most commonly observed events were low-grade nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea.

A Look Ahead

Topotecan was the first of the topoisomerase I class of drugs. It has undergone extensive study as a single agent and in combination with other drugs in clinical trials in the United States and Europe for first and second-line treatment for SCLC. Topotecan is under clinical investigation for a number of other cancers, including non-small-cell lung, breast, colorectal, and pediatric cancers, lymphoma, myeloma, and leukemia. It is also being studied as first-line combination chemotherapy in patients with ovarian cancer.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
IMAGE IQ

A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
Brian Morse, MD1 , June 10, 2013

A 48-year-old female presents with complaints of irregular vaginal bleeding and postcoital bleeding. Images from a PET/CT and pelvis MRI reveal characteristic findings. What is your diagnosis?

More Image IQs 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Soluble HER2 Levels Prognostic Factor in HER2+ Breast Cancer
  • ASCO: PD-L1 Antibody Elicits Durable Response in RCC
  • RECORD-3: Sunitinib Still Standard First-Line Treatment in Metastatic RCC
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • ASCO: Vinegar Screening Significantly Reduces Cervical Cancer Mortality
  • ASCO: Sulforaphane in Prostate Cancer Found Worthy of Further Investigation
  • Study: Recurrent Heartburn Ups Risk for Throat Cancer
  • Radiation-Induced Enteritis: Incidence, Mechanisms, and Management
  • HER2-Directed Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation: The Current State of Our Knowledge
  • It’s Time for Clinicians to Reconsider Their Proscription Against the Use of Soyfoods by Breast Cancer Patients
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter



CancerNetwork on Facebook

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy