CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home »

ONCOLOGY. Vol. 11 No. 8 8
 

Combination Docetaxel/Cyclophosphamide in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

By

Vicente Valero, MD
Chief of Oncology Services, Lyndon B. Johnson General Hospital, Department of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, and Department of Medicine, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas

| August 1, 1997
Preclinical studies show that docetaxel (Taxotere) and cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan, Neosar) are synergistic against MA 13/C mammary adenocarcinoma. Both agents are highly active as monotherapy in a number of tumors, including metastatic breast cancer. Therefore, we performed a phase I dose-finding study to determine the maximum tolerated dose of this combination regimen in patients with advanced solid tumors. A total of 45 patients were enrolled and received cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel, both administered as 1-hour intravenous infusions once every 3 weeks. The dose levels of cyclophosphamide/docetaxel were 600/60 mg/m² (group 0), 600/75 mg/m² (group 1), 700/75 mg/m² (group 2), 800/75 mg/m² (group 3), 800/85 mg/m² (group 4), 800/75 mg/m² (group 5), and 800/85 mg/m² (group 6). Patients with dose-limiting neutropenia in groups 5 and 6 received 300 µg of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (filgrastim [Neupogen]) support on days 2 through 9 during subsequent cycles of chemotherapy. All patients received premedication with 8 mg of dexamethasone twice daily for 5 days, beginning 1 day prior to chemotherapy. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenic fever. The recommended dose for phase II studies of cyclophosphamide/docetaxel is 700/75 mg/m² in previously treated patients and 800/75 mg/m² in previously untreated patients. G-CSF support did not allow for further dose escalation. Preliminary results from this phase I trial indicate that the combination of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide produced an objective response rate of 69% in 32 patients with metastatic breast cancer (including 3 patients who achieved complete responses). [ONCOLOGY 11(Suppl 8):34-36, 1997]


Introduction

Docetaxel (Taxotere) is a semisynthetic taxane that promotes tubulin assembly into microtubules, stabilizing microtubules and inhibiting depolymerization to free tubulin, thereby blocking cells in the M phase of the cell cycle.[1,2] In preclinical studies, the broad spectrum of in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity of docetaxel(Drug information on docetaxel) has translated into clinical efficacy in a variety of cancers, including breast, lung, ovarian, and others.[3] The primary toxicity of docetaxel is neutropenia, which generally resolves within 1 week.[4] The incidence of thrombocytopenia and anemia associated with docetaxel is low, occurring in less than 8% of patients.[4]

Following hepatic transformation to active alkylating metabolites, cyclophosphamide(Drug information on cyclophosphamide) (Cytoxan, Neosar) produces predominately interstrand DNA cross-links, an effect that is thought to be cell-cycle nonspecific.[5] The combination of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide is attractive for a number of reasons. Both agents have been highly active in a wide range of solid tumors. In addition, preclinical data demonstrate that docetaxel and cyclophosphamide have synergistic effects against MA 13/C mammary adenocarcinoma.[6,7] In preclinical combination studies, 60% to 70% of the maximum tolerated dose of each agent could be administered safely.[6,7] Thus, the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (filgrastim [Neupogen]) support may be useful in ameliorating neutropenic events or enabling dose-escalation before dose-limiting toxicities occur.

Determining the Maximum Tolerated Dose

Our group performed a phase I trial of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide in 45 patients with advanced solid tumors to determine the maximum tolerated dose in patients who had prior therapy for metastatic disease, and in patients with untreated metastatic disease (with and without G-CSF support), as well as to characterize the toxicity of this combination regimen.[8]

The working definition of maximum tolerated dose in this trial was 1 dose level below the dose that produces a dose-limiting toxicity in 3 or more patients during the first cycle. A dose-limiting toxicity was categorized as grade 4 or greater nonhematologic toxicity, except nausea/vomiting; grade 4 neutropenia of at least 8 days' duration; grade 4 neutropenia plus fever, with or without infection; or grade 4 thrombocytopenia.

Eligibility criteria for study participation included patients with a life expectancy of at least 3 months and with a Karnofsky performance status of at least 60%. Patients were to have histologically confirmed solid malignancies with bidimensionally measurable or evaluable disease. Moreover, patients were to have adequate hematopoietic, renal, and hepatic function. In addition, patients were to have no prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy within 4 weeks of the study.

The treatment plan consisted of patients receiving cyclophosphamide immediately followed by docetaxel, both administered over 1-hour as an intravenous infusion, once every 3 weeks. The dose levels of cyclophosphamide/docetaxel were 600/60 mg/m² (group 0), 600/75 mg/m² (group 1), 700/75 mg/m² (group 2), 800/75 mg/m² (group 3), 800/85 mg/m² (group 4), 800/75 mg/m² (group 5), and 800/85 mg/m² (group 6).

Patients with dose-limiting neutropenia in groups 5 and 6 received 300 µg of G-CSF support on days 2 through 9 during subsequent cycles of chemotherapy. All patients received premedication with 8 mg of dexamethasone(Drug information on dexamethasone) twice daily for 5 days beginning 1 day prior to chemotherapy.

Demographics

Included in the analysis were 45 patients with a median age of 53 years (range: 29 to 73 years) and a median Karnofsky performance status of 90% (range: 60% to 90%). The tumor types among the 45 patients included metastatic breast cancer (32 patients), sarcoma (6 patients), colon (3 patients), and others, including lung and head/neck cancers (4 patients). The median number of sites involved was 3 (range: 1 to 4).

Antitumor Activity

The preliminary response rate for all tumor types was 51%, consisting of 3 complete and 20 partial responses (Table 1). A total of 9 patients had stable disease, and the other 13 patients experienced progression. When the data were analyzed for the 32 patients with metastatic breast cancer, an objective response rate of 69% was noted, with 3 patients achieving a complete response and 19 achieving partial responses.

Tolerability

The combination of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide produced complicated neutropenia in approximately 51% of the patients and 16% of the cycles. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 20% of patients and 6% of cycles administered. Similarly, grade 3 to 4 infections plus neutropenia were noted in 31% of patients and only 8% of cycles.

In general, nonhematologic toxicities were mild in severity. Mucositis was the most common gastrointestinal toxicity, occurring in 38% of patients and 14% of cycles administered. Other common gastrointestinal toxicities of grade 2 severity or higher were nausea in 27% and diarrhea in 20% of the patients, respectively.

Subacute nonhematologic toxicities included moderate-to-severe fatigue (75% of patients), myalgia (47%), mild peripheral neuropathy (22%), and skin abnormalities (20%). Moderate-to-severe fluid retention occurred in only 15% of patients, with no cases of significant pleural effusions.

Conclusions

The preliminary results from this phase I study are encouraging. The combination of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide is potentially beneficial for the palliation and adjuvant management of many neoplasias, including breast cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, ovarian cancer, and others. The initial objective response rate seen in patients with metastatic breast cancer was 69%, with 3 patients achieving a complete response. In addition, the combination of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide in this phase I trial was well tolerated with no unexpected toxicities. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenic fever. The addition of G-CSF did not allow for additional dose escalation.

Based on these results, the recommended dose for phase II studies without G-CSF support) is 700 mg/m² of cyclophosphamide followed by 75 mg/m² of docetaxel, both given as 1-hour intravenous infusions, once every 3 weeks, for previously treated patients. For previously untreated patients, cyclophosphamide can be given at a dose of 800 mg/m² followed by 75 mg/m² of docetaxel.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.





1. Gueritte-Voegelein F, Guenard D, Lavelle F, et al: Relationships between the structure of Taxol analogues and their antimitotic activity. J Med Chem 34:992-998, 1991.

2. Ringel I, Horwitz SB: Studies with RP 56976 (Taxotere): A semisynthetic analogue of taxol. J Natl Cancer Inst 83:288-291, 1991.

3. Kaye SB: Docetaxel (Taxotere) in the treatment of solid tumors other than breast and lung cancer. Semin Oncol 22(suppl 4):30-33, 1995.

4. Cortes JE, Pazdur R: Docetaxel. J Clin Oncol 13:2643-2655, 1995.

5. Hengstler JG, Hengst A, Fuchs J, et al: Induction of DNA crosslinks and DNA strand lesions by cyclophosphamide after activation by cytochrome P450 2B1. Mutat Res 373:215-223, 1997.

6. Bissery MC, Vrignaud P, Bayssas M, et al: Taxotere synergistic combination with cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and 5-fluorouracil in mouse tumor models (abstract). Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 34:1782, 1993.

7. Bissery MC, Vrignaud P, Lavelle F: Preclinical profile of docetaxel (Taxotere): Efficacy as a single agent and in combination. Semin Oncol 22(suppl 13):3-16, 1995.

8. Valero V, Esparza-Guerra L, Rahman Z, et al: Phase I study of docetaxel (Taxotere) and cyclophosphamide without and with G- CSF in previously treated and untreated solid neoplasms (abstract 772). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 16, 1997.


 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
IMAGE IQ

A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
Brian Morse, MD1 , June 10, 2013

A 48-year-old female presents with complaints of irregular vaginal bleeding and postcoital bleeding. Images from a PET/CT and pelvis MRI reveal characteristic findings. What is your diagnosis?

More Image IQs 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
  • ASCO: Yoga Reduces Insomnia in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Hormone Therapy
  • Physical Activity Across the Cancer Continuum
  • Exercise After Cancer Diagnosis: Time to Get Moving
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • ASCO: Vinegar Screening Significantly Reduces Cervical Cancer Mortality
  • ASCO: Sulforaphane in Prostate Cancer Found Worthy of Further Investigation
  • Study: Recurrent Heartburn Ups Risk for Throat Cancer
  • HER2-Directed Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation: The Current State of Our Knowledge
  • It’s Time for Clinicians to Reconsider Their Proscription Against the Use of Soyfoods by Breast Cancer Patients
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • ASCO: No Benefit From Avastin in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter



CancerNetwork on Facebook

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy