CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home »

ONCOLOGY. Vol. 13 No. 2
 

What BMT Nurses Should Know About Insurance Issues

February 1, 1999

Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) nurses need to educate themselves about their patients’ insurance coverage, said the Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) at its Eighth Annual Fall Institute. First, nurses must verify that patients have coverage and then determine in which of three probable ways the coverage handles transplants: (1) as medically necessary cancer therapy—in which case, any burden of proof falls on the transplant team; (2) as excluded under the terms of the policy—the policy states that it doesn’t cover any transplants or it covers only certain types (eg, it covers leukemia but not breast cancer); or (3) as an experimental or investigational treatment—the policy states that it will not cover experimental or investigational therapies or that it may cover only randomized National Cancer Institute (NCI) clinical trials.

In addition, some insurance companies have “contract agreements” with certain transplant centers called “centers of excellence,” the only facility where the transplant may be performed. To perform the transplant elsewhere requires evidence that the alternative transplant center has good outcomes and that the procedure can be done at a reasonable price.

Cost-containment measures that insurance companies have adopted include establishing “reasonable and customary” fees, inserting preexisting condition clauses into their policies, requiring preauthorization and often a second opinion, limiting coverage to a certain amount, or specifying exclusions for specific procedures in the policy itself or insisting that transplants be performed only in their own centers of excellence.

If Coverage Is Denied

Insurance companies will need the target date of the transplant, relevant patient information, and medical justification information from the transplant physician(s). The patient’s nurse should request written verification of coverage and payment, but if coverage is denied, there are other options. The denial can be negotiated diplomatically along these guidelines:

  • Cooperate with the payors in the insurance company. Don’t be adversarial or insist that the insurer pay for the transplant; instead, focus on why the patient’s case is a good one.

  • Supply medical justification for the procedure.

  • Appeal quickly. Some insurance companies allow only 60 days between the denial and appeal.

  • Speak the insurer’s language and avoid words like “experimental” or “investigational.” These send up red flags.

  • Update protocols and patient consent forms. Always provide current information.

  • Write an effective appeal letter describing the patient’s current condition, history, and why coverage was initially denied.

  • Give a list of 5 to 10 physicians’ names as references, preferably prominent physicians who support the transplant for this particular patient.

  • Cite the transplant center’s qualifications for the procedure.

If the insurance company still denies coverage, the patient or the transplant center can appeal to the patient’s employer to intervene. If that fails, litigation may be the next step. The threat of litigation has persuaded many insurance companies to cover a transplant, especially if there is evidence that its denial is dominated by the company’s economic self-interest.

Alternative Funding Sources

If insurance coverage is denied despite these efforts, patients may obtain funding by establishing a nonprofit corporation to collect tax-deductible donations, holding auctions or other public events to raise money, or soliciting funds through the radio, newspaper, and other media.

Bone marrow transplantation is expensive. Compatibility testing for BMT costs about $5,000; bone marrow harvest, about $15,000; and the transplant itself, from $130,000 to $200,000.

The patient’s and family’s lost income are additional costs that need to be calculated.

Since conventional treatment costs $15,000 to $40,000, there are increasing efforts throughout the country to ensure coverage for anyone who needs a transplant instead. The National Association of Insurance Commissioners is considering a model act for states that would set a minimum standard of coverage for BMT. Medicaid covers BMT in most cases for breast cancer; CHAMPUS, the military insurer, covers transplants for breast cancer if the person is enrolled in an NCI randomized clinical trial; and the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program (covering 9 million people in the United States) covers BMT for breast cancer.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
IMAGE IQ

A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
Brian Morse, MD1 , June 10, 2013

A 48-year-old female presents with complaints of irregular vaginal bleeding and postcoital bleeding. Images from a PET/CT and pelvis MRI reveal characteristic findings. What is your diagnosis?

More Image IQs 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Soluble HER2 Levels Prognostic Factor in HER2+ Breast Cancer
  • ASCO: PD-L1 Antibody Elicits Durable Response in RCC
  • RECORD-3: Sunitinib Still Standard First-Line Treatment in Metastatic RCC
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • ASCO: Vinegar Screening Significantly Reduces Cervical Cancer Mortality
  • ASCO: Sulforaphane in Prostate Cancer Found Worthy of Further Investigation
  • Study: Recurrent Heartburn Ups Risk for Throat Cancer
  • Radiation-Induced Enteritis: Incidence, Mechanisms, and Management
  • HER2-Directed Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation: The Current State of Our Knowledge
  • It’s Time for Clinicians to Reconsider Their Proscription Against the Use of Soyfoods by Breast Cancer Patients
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter



CancerNetwork on Facebook

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy