CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home »

ONCOLOGY. Vol. 10 No. 6
Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Response of the Normal Eye to High Dose Radiotherapy

By James T. Parsons, MD, Francis J. Bova, PhD, William M. Mendenhall, MD, Rodney R. Million, MD

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville

Constance R. Fitzgerald, MD, Private Practice of Ophthalmology, Gainesville | June 1, 1996

Radiation therapy of tumors near the eye or optic nerves often requires incidental irradiation of these structures, even when they are not clinically involved by tumor. Depending on the radiation treatment volume and dose required, radiation injury to the lens, lacrimal apparatus, retina, or optic nerve may result. The time to expression and severity of injury are dose-dependent. This paper reviews the results of 157 patients who were followed for a minimum of 3 years after radiotherapy for primary extracranial tumors at the University of Florida, in which the lacrimal gland, lens, retina, and/or optic nerve(s) received irradiation. This review shows that, after treatment at approximately 1.8 to 2.0 Gy per fraction, the incidence of severe dry-eye syndrome, retinopathy, and optic neuropathy appears to increase steeply after doses of 40, 50, and 60 Gy, respectively. [ONCOLOGY 10(6):837-852, 1996]

Introduction

Although primary tumors of the eye (eg, melanoma, retinoblastoma) and optic nerve (eg, glioma) are rare, tumors that involve tissues adjacent to these structures are relatively common. Because many of these tumors are best treated with radiation therapy, the visual apparatus frequently receives incidental irradiation. Tumors for which irradiation usually is employed include those of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses, nasopharynx, orbit (eg, lymphomas), and central nervous system (eg, pituitary), as well as advanced cancer of the eyelid and periorbital skin.

The manner in which radiation oncologists report ocular complications differs from the way in which such complications are reported in the surgical literature. Characteristically, radiation damage that leads to a marked reduction in visual acuity (typically after a latent interval of 1 to 3 years) has been scored by radiation oncologists as a "severe complication." In contrast, surgical sacrifice of the orbital contents (with immediate visual loss) has been regarded as an unfortunate by-product of complete tumor removal and not as a complication per se.

When tumors of the paranasal sinuses are irradiated, varying portions of the eye fall within the treatment fields, depending on the degree to which the orbit is invaded. When orbital invasion is extensive, all of the orbital contents are irradiated, including the eyeball and all of the lacrimal tissue.[1] If the administered dose is high, as is the case when a carcinoma is treated, a dry eye results; visual loss usually occurs within 6 to 10 months after treatment, due to degeneration of the anterior segment of the eye, with resultant corneal ulceration and opacification and possible endophthalmitis. Lower doses, as are used in the treatment of lymphomas, result in only mild symptoms of a dry eye and cataract formation, usually a correctable form of visual loss.

If orbital invasion is limited, so that most of the lacrimal tissue can be spared high-dose irradiation,[1,2] severe dry-eye problems do not occur, even when high doses are administered. If the dose to the eyeball itself is high, however, visual loss due to posterior segment degeneration (radiation retinopathy) may occur, usually after a 2- to 3-year latency period. If low total doses are used, patients usually remain asymptomatic in the follow-up period with regard to dry-eye complaints and retinal problems but are still at risk for cataract formation if the lens was irradiated.

Even when the orbial invasion has not occurred, it is often necessary to include a portion of the contiguous orbit and the medial one-fourth to one-third of the eyeball in the irradiation field[1] because of the anatomic configuration of the sinuses and because of possible subclinical disease extensions through the thin bony walls that separate the sinuses from the orbit. Although visual loss secondary to eyeball injury is rare in this setting, there is still a risk of blindness due to optic nerve injury, usually after a 1- to 6-year latency period; the magnitude of risk depends on the daily fraction size and total dose administered.

Patients who are to undergo high-dose eye or optic nerve irradiation should be evaluated before treatment by an ophthalmologist knowledgeable about radiation complications. Most potential visual complications can be anticipated during the treatment planning stage, and patients should understand these risks. Follow-up should be continued in the post-treatment period on a regularly scheduled basis of prophylaxis, not just when indicated by specific problems. Frequently, a number of ophthalmologic problems occur simultaneously (eg, dry-eye symptoms, cataracts, radiation retinopathy, and glaucoma), which makes assessment confusing and management difficult.

Before undertaking any specific treatment, the ophthalmologist should correlate the treatment details with the radiation therapist, because some pitfalls may be avoided by good communication. For example, if high-dose irradiation has been administered to the eyeball, cataract formation will almost certainly be accompanied by the development of radiation retinopathy. Unless measures have been taken to manage the radiation retinopathy, removal of the cataract may increase the incidence of neovascular glaucoma. Also, anterior-segment disease should be treated early and aggressively to avoid corneal complications. Even when vision is lost, vigorous attempts to save the eye are worthwhile for cosmetic reasons.

Between October 1964 and May 1989, 157 patients underwent radiotherapy at the University of Florida, Gainesville, for primary extracranial tumors that required irradiation of the eyes or optic nerves. All patients were followed for a minimum of 3 years. In this article, we will explore the various ophthalmologic complications that may occur in patients undergoing radiation therapy at these sites, based on our own experience, as well as a review of the literature.

Severe Dry-Eye Syndrome

When the orbit is extensively invaded by carcinoma, high-dose irradiation of the entire orbit is necessary, and generally results in severe dry-eye syndrome. Patients develop a red, painful, scratchy eye (foreign-body sensation) and photophobia. The drying effects of wind are particularly bothersome. Severe problems may produce corneal epithelial breakdown, ulceration with bacterial infection, vascularization, opacification, or perforation. Some patients develop iritis in association with corneal ulceration. Symblepharon (scarring of the conjunctival tissue) or phthisis bulbi (shrinking of the globe) are observed occasionally.

Most patients who develop severe dry-eye syndrome become severely symptomatic within 1 month after completion of irradiation. Corneal opacification and vascularization are often pronounced within 9 to 10 months after therapy is completed.

Various treatments have been administered in an attempt to control symptoms of severe dry-eye syndrome, including artificial tears, lubricating ointments, bandage contact lens, conjunctival flaps, or tarsorrhaphy. Topical steroids are occasionally used for iritis. Topical and/or systemic antibiotics are prescribed for treatment of corneal ulcers. Retrobulbar alcohol(Drug information on alcohol) injections may be used in a uninfected painful eye. Many patients eventually require enucleation or evisceration because of endophthalmitis with pain and perforation of the globe.

University of Florida Data

At the University of Florida, 33 patients with extracranial head and neck tumors received irradiation of an entire orbit. Most patients were treated with cobalt-60. The dose to the lacrimal apparatus was calculated at a depth of 1 cm from the anterior skin surface, the approximate depth of the major lacrimal gland. The end point of the study was severe dry-eye syndrome sufficient to produce visual loss secondary to corneal opacification, ulceration, or vascularization.

Follow-up in 13 patients who did not develop severe dry-eye complications ranged from 3 to 20 years (mean, 7.3 years; median, 4 years). Sixteen patients received 45 Gy or less and 17 patients received 57 Gy or more. There are no data in the mid-range of doses (45.01 to 56.99 Gy). All 17 patients who received doses of 57 Gy or more developed severe dry-eye syndrome, as compared with 3 (19%) of 16 patients who received 45 Gy or less.

Data From the Literature

There are limited data in the literature on the probability of dry-eye complications according to dose. Consideration of the data from Parsons et al [3], Morita and Kawake [4], Bessell et al [5], and Letschert et al[6] reveals that the exact clinical end points of the various studies were not always clearly defined and probably differ somewhat from study to study. The sigmoid dose-response curve that has been constructed should be considered a first approximation, and more data are needed, particularly along the steep portion of the curve. The probability of complications appears to increase steeply at doses above 40 Gy.

Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
IMAGE IQ

A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
Brian Morse, MD1 , June 10, 2013

A 48-year-old female presents with complaints of irregular vaginal bleeding and postcoital bleeding. Images from a PET/CT and pelvis MRI reveal characteristic findings. What is your diagnosis?

More Image IQs 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
  • ASCO: Yoga Reduces Insomnia in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Hormone Therapy
  • Physical Activity Across the Cancer Continuum
  • Exercise After Cancer Diagnosis: Time to Get Moving
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • ASCO: Vinegar Screening Significantly Reduces Cervical Cancer Mortality
  • ASCO: Sulforaphane in Prostate Cancer Found Worthy of Further Investigation
  • Study: Recurrent Heartburn Ups Risk for Throat Cancer
  • HER2-Directed Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation: The Current State of Our Knowledge
  • It’s Time for Clinicians to Reconsider Their Proscription Against the Use of Soyfoods by Breast Cancer Patients
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • ASCO: No Benefit From Avastin in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter



CancerNetwork on Facebook

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy