CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home »

ONCOLOGY. Vol. 12 No. 3 5
Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Pivotal Trials of Letrozole: A New Aromatase Inhibitor

By

Ian E. Smith, MD, FRCP, FRCP(E), Consultant Medical Oncologist—Breast Unit, Head of Section of Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, England

| March 2, 1998
Letrozole (Femara) is a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor that is approximately 10,000 times as potent as aminoglutethimide in vivo. Two pivotal multinational phase III trials have compared letrozole (0.5 and 2.5 mg/d) against megestrol acetate and aminoglutethimide, respectively, in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. The letrozole vs megestrol acetate trial showed the superiority of letrozole (2.5 mg/d) over megestrol acetate with respect to response rate, response duration, duration of overall clinical benefit (complete response plus partial response plus stable disease ³ 6 months), time to progression, and time to treatment failure. The letrozole-treated patients also showed a nonsignificant trend toward better survival. In the letrozole vs aminoglutethimide trial, letrozole (2.5 mg/d) was significantly superior in terms of duration of overall clinical benefit and survival. There were also strong trends favoring letrozole with regard to objective response rate and duration of response. Unexpectedly, both trials demonstrated a dose-response effect for 2.5 mg of letrozole over 0.5 mg in terms of response and overall survival. This finding raises the possibility that intratumoral aromatase suppression may be more relevant in breast cancer therapy than are plasma estrogen levels.[ONCOLOGY(Suppl 5):41-44, 1998]

Over the last 15 years, inhibitors of aromatase, the enzyme responsible for estrogen biosynthesis, have been found to be active agents in the treatment of breast cancer. Aminoglutethimide, the first aromatase inhibitor, was shown to be an effective, useful agent,[1] with activity at least equivalent to that of tamoxifen(Drug information on tamoxifen) (Nolvadex)[2] in advanced breast cancer. Aminoglutethimide was associated with unwanted side effects, however, including somnolence (at higher doses) and rash.[3]

The next step in the clinical development of aromatase inhibitors was 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (formestane), the first steroidal compound to be structurally designed to inhibit aromatase.[4] This agent proved to be more specific than aminoglutethimide and had fewer systemic side effects, but it had poor oral availability and therefore had to be given by intravenous injection.[5]

A third generation of nonsteroidal imidazole aromatase inhibitors has now been developed; these new inhibitors are several orders more potent than aminoglutethimide. The first of the third-generation agents, fadrozole (COS 16949A), initially led the field in clinical trials. It gradually became apparent, however, that fadrozole had minor but unwanted aldosterone-suppressing effects.

Three other important imidazole-type aromatase inhibitors are now in advanced clinical trials or are registered for use in advanced breast cancer: anastrozole(Drug information on anastrozole) (Arimidex), vorozole (Rivizor), and letrozole(Drug information on letrozole) (Femara). This paper focuses on the clinical development of letrozole, with particular emphasis on the pivotal large phase III clinical trials that led to its approval by the FDA for use in the treatment of advanced breast cancer.

Potency and Endocrine Effects

Letrozole is a nonsteroidal triazole derivative. One of the most potent aromatase inhibitors yet developed, letrozole is approximately 10,000 times as potent as aminoglutethimide in vivo, with no evidence of inhibition of other steroid pathways at doses required to inhibit estrogen.[6] In animal models, it achieves almost complete regression of estrogen-dependent, dimethylbenzanthracene-induced mammary tumors.[6]

Endocrine Effects

In a phase I study conducted at the Royal Marsden Hospital, 21 postmenopausal patients were treated with letrozole in three successive groups of seven, receiving 0.1, 0.5, and 2.5 mg/d orally, respectively. Letrozole produced a statistically significant suppression of estradiol(Drug information on estradiol) by 74% from baseline levels and estrone(Drug information on estrone) by 79% (P < .0001). Suppression occurred in all three patient groups, with many patients having serum estradiol and estrone concentrations below the limit of detection of the assays (3 and 10 pM, respectively), corresponding to a maximum measurable estrogen suppression of 86%.[7] Letrozole had no significant effect on serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), cortisol, 17-hydroxyprogesterone, androstenedione, or aldosterone.

In a subsequent Royal Marsden phase I trial of letrozole specifically designed to measure aromatase inhibition in vivo (see below), 13 patients were randomly allocated to 0.5 and 2.5 mg/d.[8] Estrone and estradiol levels fell by 82% and 84.1%, respectively, at 0.5 mg/d and by 81% and 68%, respectively, at 2.5 mg/d.

In a nonrandomized comparative phase I clinical efficacy study, Demers et al[9] compared the endocrine-suppressing effects of fadrozole and letrozole using the same high-sensitivity estrogen radioimmunoassay. Letrozole appeared to be the more potent of the two drugs. Fadrozole achieved a 68% suppression of estrone and 70% suppression of estradiol at all of the doses used. Letrozole, at doses of 0.1 to 5 mg/d, suppressed both estrone and estradiol by > 95%, resulting in undetectable levels in many patients.

In Vivo Aromatase Inhibition

At the Royal Marsden, we measured in vivo aromatase inhibition by letrozole in 13 postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer randomized to a daily dose of 0.5 or 2.5 mg for at least 6 weeks.[8] After 6 weeks, 0.5 and 2.5 mg/d of letrozole inhibited aromatization by a mean (geometric) of 98.4% (range, 97.3% to > 99.1%) and > 98.9% (98.5% to > 99.1%), respectively. This was a greater degree of aromatase inhibition than had been achieved previously with any other inhibitor.

Phase I and II Studies

In our original phase I study,[7] 7 (33%) of 21 patients achieved an objective response and 5 had stable disease for more than 3 months. All of these patients had received at least one prior endocrine treatment.

In an American phase I trial, 23 heavily pretreated postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer were given letrozole at doses ranging from 0.1 to 5 mg/d. Only two patients (10%) had partial responses, but an additional seven had stable disease.[10]

Better results were achieved in a third phase I Italian trial, in which 14 postmenopausal patients were treated with 0.5 mg/d of letrozole. One patient achieved a complete response and four patients, a partial response, for an overall objective response rate of 36%. No toxic effects relating to letrozole were seen in any patient.[11]

Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
IMAGE IQ

A 52-Year-Old Man Presents With an Erythematous Lesion
Cesar Moran, MD , May 22, 2013

A 52-year-old man presented with an erythematous lesion in the axilla of unknown duration. Surgical excision was performed. What is your diagnosis?

More Image IQs 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Five Steps to Improving Patient Access
Judy Capko,  May 21, 2013
Patient access is getting increased attention through reform initiatives. Here are five steps you can take to make sure patients get appropriate access to care in your office.
Growing HIPAA Threat – Ignore Windows XP at Your Own Peril
Marion K. Jenkins,  May 21, 2013
Chances are good that you have some major ticking software time bombs lurking in your medical practice's computer environment, namely Windows XP and Server 2003.
Finding Physician Work-Life Balance in the Small Moments
Jennifer Frank, MD,  May 21, 2013
At my practice and at home, things are always busy. There's laundry or homework, or a patient with needs.
Three Areas to Reduce Costs at Your Medical Practice
Greg Mertz,  May 19, 2013
By taking a hard look at reducing costs for staffing, overhead, and technology at your medical practice, you may see increased physician compensation.
Dos and Don’ts for Starting a Physician Blog
Michael Woo-Ming, MD,  May 18, 2013
Starting a physician blog can provide your medical practice with marketing benefits, but it's important to do it right.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • The ABCDEs of Moles and Melanomas
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Therapy Innovations
  • A 52-Year-Old Man Presents With an Erythematous Lesion
  • Bone Metastases
  • Palliative Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Bone Metastases Improves Quality of Life
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Financial Toxicity, Part II: How Can We Help With the Burden of Treatment-Related Costs?
  • Patient Quality of Life Endpoints in Oncology Trials, Part II
  • Who's Coding Whom?
  • “How Do I Say This Nicely? Your Oncologist Wasn't Following Guidelines”
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • Cancer Metabolism as a Therapeutic Target
  • Study: Cholesterol Drugs Reduced Risk of Prostate Cancer Death
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • ONS: Safe Handling of Chemotherapy
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter



CancerNetwork on Facebook

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy