CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home »

ONCOLOGY. Vol. 11 No. 5
 

Summary of the NIH Consensus Development Conference on Cervical Cancer

May 1, 1997

Carcinoma of the cervix is one of the most common malignancies in women, accounting for 15,700 new cases and 4,900 deaths in the United States each year. Worldwide, cervical cancer is second only to breast cancer as the most common malignancy in both incidence and mortality. During the last 50 years in the United States, screening programs based on the Papanicolaou (Pap) smear and pelvic examination have led to a steep decline in the incidence of and deaths from cervical cancer.

Both invasive cervical cancers and precursor lesions have been firmly associated with the presence of human papillomavirus (HPV). It has also been well established that most squamous cell cancers of the cervix progress through a series of well-defined preinvasive lesions, and that during this usually lengthy process, the disease can be easily detected by Pap smear screening. During this preinvasive stage, cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) can be controlled with nearly uniform success and with the retention of fertility.

Many treatment and quality of life issues remain unresolved for women with cervical cancer. To address these issues, the National Cancer Institute and the NIH Office of Medical Aplications of Research convened a Consensus Development Conference on Cervical Cancer on April 1-3, 1996. A 13-member panel, representing gynecologic, medical, and radiation oncologists, gynecologists, pathologists, epidemiologists, and patients, listened to presentations by experts and reached conclusions on four critical questions.

How Can We Strengthen Efforts to Prevent Cervical Cancer?

Despite the recognized benefits of Pap smear screening, substantial subgroups of American women have not been screened or are not screened regularly. One-half of the women with newly diagnosed invasive cervical carcinoma have never had a Pap smear, and another 10% have not had a smear in the past 5 years. Unscreened populations include older women, the uninsured, ethnic minorities (especially Hispanics and elderly blacks), and poor women, particularly those in rural areas. To improve outreach, community-based, culturally sensitive approaches to reaching diverse ethnic populations are recommended.

Pap smear methods have changed little since the test was introduced in the late 1940s. Liquid-based specimen collection methods are currently being evaluated to improve sampling and cell preservation and presentation. In the fall of 1995, the FDA approved two automated instruments for rescreening smears evaluated as negative on the initial screen. Data from clinical trials suggest that these instruments could reduce the rate of false-negative smears, but neither the efficacy in routine practice nor the cost-benefit of the devices has been determined.

Primary Prevention--A strong causal relationship between HPV and cervical cancer and its precursors has been established. The virus is transmitted through sexual intercourse, with a peak prevalence of infection in women in the 22- to 25-year-old age group. Primary prevention of HPV infection will require: (1) directing education efforts toward adolescents and health-care providers regarding the strong causal link between acquisition of HPV as a sexually transmitted disease and development of cervical cancer and its precursors; (2) encouraging delayed onset of sexual intercourse; (3) developing an effective prophylactic vaccine; and (4) developing effective vaginal microbicides. The data on the use of barrier methods of contraception to prevent the spread of HPV are controversial but do not support this as an effective method of prevention.

Secondary Prevention--Secondary prevention efforts must focus on: (1) developing effective antiviral agents to treat HPV and/or prevent transformation; (2) developing therapeutic vaccines to prevent HPV progression; (3) improving the sensitivity and specificity of screening for the precursors of cervical cancer; and (4) expanding education and screening programs to target underscreened populations.

What Is the Appropriate Management of Low-Stage Cervical Cancer?

The diagnosis of Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) stage IA1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma should be based on cone biopsy, not punch cervical biopsy, preferably by using a technique that does not result in cauterized margins. At this stage, simple hysterectomy or cone biopsy (with negative margins) is virtually 100% curative; the choice of therapy should be influenced by the patient's desire to preserve fertility. At our present state of knowledge, a category of cervical adenocarcinoma that could be treated conservatively in order to preserve fertility cannot be identified.

Patients with IA2 lesions can be treated with primary radical or modified radical hysterectomy or primary radiation therapy with equivalent results. The choice of therapy should be influenced by such factors as ovarian preservation, comorbid conditions, and potential late side effects.

Patients with stages IB and IIA cervical cancer are appropriately treated with either radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy or radiation therapy (external-beam therapy and brachytherapy) with equivalent results. The choice of therapy should be influenced by the same factors described in patients with stage IA2 disease. To minimize morbidity, primary therapy should avoid the routine use of both radical surgery and radiation therapy.

The optimal role for imaging studies in defining the extent of disease and in planning radiation therapy needs further investigation, as does the measurement of serum tumor markers in patients with invasive cervical cancer.

What Is the Appropriate Management of Advanced-Stage and Recurrent Cervical Cancer?

For stage IIB or greater, the standard of care is primary radiation therapy, consisting of external-beam radiation using megavoltage radiation energies and brachytherapy. Low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy significantly reduces the rate of local recurrence. The use of high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR) has been increasing, although more studies are needed to define optimal fractionation schemes, as well as long-term complications of this method.

Cytotoxic chemotherapy for advanced cervical cancer is currently under study. Cisplatin(Drug information on cisplatin) (Platinol) is the drug with the best documented single-agent activity. At present, there is no evidence that the addition of other drugs improves survival.

Patients with locally recurrent disease are treated with the modality not previously received. Patients who have had a hysterectomy should receive pelvic radiation therapy. Patients who have had maximal radiation therapy may have surgery, depending on the site of recurrence and extent of disease. The clearest role for surgical therapy is for centrally recurrent disease. For most patients, tailored pelvic exenteration remains the standard surgical approach. Aggressive therapies for recurrent disease after radiation are emotionally, physically, and economically costly, and this should be considered in making treatment decisions.

Palliative treatment is appropriate for patients with symptomatic disease and can be achieved in most patients by radiation therapy. Oncologists should assure patients that psychological support and adequate treatment of all symptoms, including pain, are part of the treatment plan.

What Are New Directions for Research in Cervical Cancer?

In the area of prevention, more research is needed on the modification of high-risk behavior in young people. In addition, research is needed on the optimal methods of evaluating and treating HIV-positive women with cervical lesions; improved screening in populations that are typically underscreened; provider behaviors that influence patient and clinician compliance with Pap smear screening; and methods of improving the accuracy and interpretation of cytologic sampling techniques, including liquid-based systems and computer automation. Also needed is research to develop markers to predict which women with low-grade lesions are likely to develop high-grade lesions or cancer. Support should also be given to research on topical microbicides that may prevent infection with HPV.

Additional research is needed to improve staging, treatment, and quality of life for cervical cancer patients. Included among these are investigations into optimal pre- and post-treatment imaging; prognostic markers to improve treatment selection; laparoscopic surgical techniques; radiobiology; and the addition of systemic chemotherapy to radiation therapy.

Cervical cancer can, in theory, be prevented and treated by HPV vaccine therapy; research on such an approach may have a profound impact on this disease.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
IMAGE IQ

A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
Brian Morse, MD1 , June 10, 2013

A 48-year-old female presents with complaints of irregular vaginal bleeding and postcoital bleeding. Images from a PET/CT and pelvis MRI reveal characteristic findings. What is your diagnosis?

More Image IQs 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
  • ASCO: Yoga Reduces Insomnia in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Hormone Therapy
  • Physical Activity Across the Cancer Continuum
  • Exercise After Cancer Diagnosis: Time to Get Moving
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • ASCO: Vinegar Screening Significantly Reduces Cervical Cancer Mortality
  • ASCO: Sulforaphane in Prostate Cancer Found Worthy of Further Investigation
  • Study: Recurrent Heartburn Ups Risk for Throat Cancer
  • HER2-Directed Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation: The Current State of Our Knowledge
  • It’s Time for Clinicians to Reconsider Their Proscription Against the Use of Soyfoods by Breast Cancer Patients
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • ASCO: No Benefit From Avastin in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter



CancerNetwork on Facebook

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy