CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home »

ONCOLOGY. Vol. 13 No. 2
The Mercadante/Fulfaro Article Reviewed 

Alternatives to Oral Opioids for Cancer Pain

By

Paul H. Coluzzi, MD, The Breast Care and Oncology Care Center, Orange, California

| February 1, 1999

The practicing medical oncologist is faced with several options when selecting opioid analgesics. As Drs. Mercadante and Fulfaro underscore, when all routes of administration are available, the oral route is preferred.

The most commonly used opioids, morphine(Drug information on morphine) and oxycodone(Drug information on oxycodone), are available as long-acting preparations and are often preferred initially to transdermal systems because of their ability to be titrated. These formulations allow for rapid titration to effect (usually 24 to 48 hours) and enable the use of a companion short-acting analgesic to provide analgesia during the titration period. This concept of “oral patient-controlled analgesia” is both clinically efficacious and cost-effective.[1]

Intravenous or Subcutaneous Routes

The authors also underscore the need for alternative delivery systems for patients unable to swallow. In general oncology and hospice practice settings, the use of intravenous or subcutaneous morphine or hydromorphone(Drug information on hydromorphone) is the gold standard when the oral route is unavailable. Again, these routes allow for both baseline and bolus dosing (patient-controlled analgesia) and rapid titration. They may prove to be expensive and burdensome to the ambulatory patient and family for long-term use, however.

Rectally Administered Morphine

The authors appropriately point out that practitioners can use long-acting morphine tablets or capsules rectally in patients unable to swallow. The pharmacokinetics that the authors discuss support this use for a limited time, as along as the practitioner realizes that multiple absorption and dosing variables do not support the routine use of this route. It is my practice to use rectally administered long-acting morphine only when the patient has several days to a week to live. This approach ensures reasonable analgesia without the need to switch to a transdermal system, which may takes days to titrate, or to an interventional subcutaneous or intravenous route.

Transdermal and Transmucosal Fentanyl(Drug information on fentanyl)

The most commonly used, effective alternative delivery method for opioid analgesics in outpatients who are unable to swallow is transdermal fentanyl (Duragesic). Similar in efficacy to long-acting morphine and oxycodone, transdermal fentanyl cannot be titrated rapidly and often takes up to 72 hours to attain a steady state. This limitation may be to patients’ detriment if their pain is changing rapidly.

In addition, while subcutaneous reservoirs are saturating, a supplemental medication, usually morphine or hydromorphone, must be given. Transdermal fentanyl is most appropriate for patients with chronic, stable pain who are unable to swallow or tolerate long-acting morphine or oxycodone.

In the near future, oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC [Actiq]) will allow for adequate analgesia during initial dosing and titration of transdermal fentanyl. Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate is the only oral transmucosal opioid that affords rapid pain relief during breakthrough episodes of pain. It is also the only short-acting opioid analgesic whose titration is based on a clinically investigated schedule.

In addition, OTFC can be safely and effectively paired with long-acting morphine and oxycodone without affecting the baseline analgesic requirements.[2] Whether OTFC is more effective for episodic pain than the currently available oral morphine products is unknown; this question is currently under study in a multicenter, double-blind trial.

The use of OTFC in minimally conscious or comatose patients has not been investigated. This information is of particular importance, given the increasing popularity of the use of “sublingual” morphine in terminally ill patients. Patients and nurses often report “immediate” relief of pain with hypercon- centrated formulations of morphine sulfate (ie, 20 mg/mL) taken sublingually. Several scientific studies question the scientific likelihood that a hydrophilic product, such as morphine, can be absorbed through the oral mucosa.[3] Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate promises to offer dependable transmucosal delivery of an opioid for severe episodic pain and may replace the sublingual delivery of other opioids.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.



Sebastiano Mercadante, MD, and Fabio Fulfaro, MD


1. Coluzzi P: Oral patient controlled analgesia and breakthrough pain. Semin Oncol 24(suppl):516-542, 1997.

2. Christie J, Simmonds M, Dalt R, et al : Dose titration, multicenter study of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for treatment of breakthrough pain in cancer patients using transdermal fentanyl for persistent pain. J Clin Oncol 16(10):3238-3245, 1998.

3. Coluzzi P: Sublingual morphine: Efficacy reviewed. J Pain Symptom Management 16(3): 187-192, 1998.


 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
IMAGE IQ

A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
Brian Morse, MD1 , June 10, 2013

A 48-year-old female presents with complaints of irregular vaginal bleeding and postcoital bleeding. Images from a PET/CT and pelvis MRI reveal characteristic findings. What is your diagnosis?

More Image IQs 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Soluble HER2 Levels Prognostic Factor in HER2+ Breast Cancer
  • ASCO: PD-L1 Antibody Elicits Durable Response in RCC
  • RECORD-3: Sunitinib Still Standard First-Line Treatment in Metastatic RCC
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • ASCO: Vinegar Screening Significantly Reduces Cervical Cancer Mortality
  • ASCO: Sulforaphane in Prostate Cancer Found Worthy of Further Investigation
  • Study: Recurrent Heartburn Ups Risk for Throat Cancer
  • Radiation-Induced Enteritis: Incidence, Mechanisms, and Management
  • HER2-Directed Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation: The Current State of Our Knowledge
  • It’s Time for Clinicians to Reconsider Their Proscription Against the Use of Soyfoods by Breast Cancer Patients
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter



CancerNetwork on Facebook

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy