CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home »

ONCOLOGY. Vol. 11 No. 5
 

ONS Position Statement on Placebos in Cancer Pain Management Endorsed by 24 Organizations

May 1, 1997

The Position Statement on the Use of Placebos for Pain Management in Patients with Cancer, developed recently by the Oncology Nursing Society (ONS), has been endorsed by 24 nursing and other healthcare organizations.

When the statement was initially published in June 1996, ONS invited a variety of organizations to endorse it. The position statement was developed to support clinicians and enhance the care of patients with cancer. Between 50% to 80% of patients with cancer experience pain that require analgesics. The use of placebos in their treatment is quite common. The Society, however, believes that placebos should not be used in the assessment and management of cancer pain.

Position Statement Based on Several Issues

The Oncology Nursing Society bases its position statement on several issues. First, there are many misconceptions about the use of placebos. In particular, some believe that placebos can be used to accurately assess whether pain is real and to adequately treat pain without harmful side effects. Positive response to placebos is often viewed as evidence of malingering, exaggerating, or faking pain. These assumptions are incorrect.

Also, placebos are often used in a punitive sense for patients who have exhibited manipulative or demanding behaviors or in vulnerable populations, such as those with histories of psychiatric problems or substance abuse.

In addition, the use of placebos necessarily involves deception, which automatically raises serious ethical concerns. The use of placebos threatens the inherent ethical values and norms of health-care professionals as articulated in the ANA Code for Nurses.

Based on these assumptions, the ONS believes that placebos should not be used to assess or manage cancer pain, to determine whether the pain is "real," or to diagnose psychological symptoms, such as anxiety associated with pain. The Society asserts that nurses should not administer placebos in these circumstances even if there is a medical order to do so.

The position statement also includes recommendations to assist health-care providers with making decisions regarding the use of placebos.

For a complimentary copy of the position statement, contact ONS, 501 Holiday Drive, Pittsburgh, PA 15220, or call (412) 921-7373 or FAX (412) 921-6565.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.

Organizations Endorsing ONS Position Statement on Placebos

  • American Association of Critical-Care Nurses
  • American Association of Diabetes Educators
  • American Association of Neuro-Science Nurses
  • American Association of Nurse Anesthetists
  • American Association of Occupational Health Nurses
  • American Nephrology Nurses' Association
  • American Radiological Nurses Association
  • American Society of Ophthalmic Registered Nurses
  • Army Nurse Corps
  • Association of Community Health Nursing Educators
  • Association of Operating Room Nurses
  • Association of Pediatric Oncology Nurses
  • Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses
  • Hospice Nurses Association
  • International Society of Nurses in Cancer Care
  • National Association of School Nurses
  • National Federation of Specialty Nursing Organizations
  • National League for Nursing
  • National Student Nurses' Association
  • Resource Center for State Cancer Pain Initiatives
  • Respiratory Nursing Society
  • Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates
  • Society of Urologic Nurses and Associates
  • Wisconsin Cancer Pain Initiative





 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
IMAGE IQ

A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
Brian Morse, MD1 , June 10, 2013

A 48-year-old female presents with complaints of irregular vaginal bleeding and postcoital bleeding. Images from a PET/CT and pelvis MRI reveal characteristic findings. What is your diagnosis?

More Image IQs 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
  • ASCO: Yoga Reduces Insomnia in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Hormone Therapy
  • Physical Activity Across the Cancer Continuum
  • Exercise After Cancer Diagnosis: Time to Get Moving
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • ASCO: Vinegar Screening Significantly Reduces Cervical Cancer Mortality
  • ASCO: Sulforaphane in Prostate Cancer Found Worthy of Further Investigation
  • Study: Recurrent Heartburn Ups Risk for Throat Cancer
  • HER2-Directed Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation: The Current State of Our Knowledge
  • It’s Time for Clinicians to Reconsider Their Proscription Against the Use of Soyfoods by Breast Cancer Patients
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • ASCO: No Benefit From Avastin in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter



CancerNetwork on Facebook

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy