CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home »

ONCOLOGY. Vol. 14 No. 9
Pages: 1  2  3  
Next
 

Pharmacology and Clinical Status of Capecitabine

By

Richard L. Schilsky, MD
Associate Dean for Clinical Research, Biological Sciences Division, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

| September 1, 2000
Capecitabine (Xeloda) is a new, orally administered, enzyme-activated fluoropyrimidine carbamate designed to generate high levels of fluorouracil (5-FU) in tumor cells. Selective tumor activation of 5´-deoxy-5-fluorouridine, the last enzymatic step of a three-enzyme process, is catalyzed by thymidine phosphorylase, a tumor-associated angiogenic growth factor. Since levels of thymidine phosphorylase are often higher in tumors than in surrounding normal tissues, this stepwise process provides tumor selectivity and potentially decreases toxicity to normal tissues. Preclinical studies show that capecitabine has significant activity against a variety of tumor types when used as monotherapy and in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. Capecitabine is currently approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer resistant to paclitaxel (Taxol) and in whom further anthracycline therapy is contraindicated. It has demonstrated efficacy in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma, and studies are ongoing in other tumor types. [ONCOLOGY 14(9):1297-1306, 2000]


Introduction

First introduced in 1957, the fluoropyrimidine fluorouracil(Drug information on fluorouracil) (5-FU) remains a major chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of gastrointestinal, breast, and head and neck cancers. Although response rates of advanced cancers to 5-FU remain in the 15% to 20% range, the complexity and variability of the drug’s metabolism offer an opportunity to optimize fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy. This can be done by selecting tumors most likely to respond to the drug, altering drug scheduling, inhibiting 5-FU catabolism, modifying pharmacokinetics by administering 5-FU prodrugs, or screening individuals for genetic polymorphisms that may increase the risks of 5-FU toxicity. Capecitabine(Drug information on capecitabine) (Xeloda) is a new, orally available, tumor-selective fluoropyrimidine carbamate prodrug activated by a three-enzyme process to provide high levels of 5-FU in tumor cells.[1,2]

This article will briefly review the metabolism of 5-FU, the determinants of sensitivity to fluoropyrimidines, and strategies to optimize fluoropyrimidine therapy. It will then describe the preclinical and clinical pharmacology of capecitabine.

Activation and Catabolism of 5-FU

As shown in Figure 1, 5-FU undergoes a series of anabolic and catabolic reactions. The cytotoxicity of 5-FU appears to result from the inhibitory activity of 5-fluoro-2´-deoxyuridine-5´-monophosphate (FdUMP) on thymidylate synthase and the incorporation of fluoropyrimidines into ribonucleic acid (RNA) and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA).[3,4] Although the incorporation of fluorouridine into RNA can produce toxicity as a result of major effects on RNA processing and function, the effects of 5-fluoro-2´-deoxyuridine-5´-triphosphate (FdUTP) incorporation into DNA are less clear. Presumably, its presence activates the excision repair process. However, since DNA repair requires the presence of thymidine triphosphate, a substrate depleted in 5-FU–treated cells, DNA strand breakage is likely to occur.

5-FU Activation

• Ribonucleotide Synthesis—Fluorouracil follows the same pathways as uracil in pyrimidine biosynthesis. Uridine phosphorylase and uridine kinase sequentially convert 5-FU to 5-fluorouridine and then to 5-fluorouridine-5´-monophosphate (FUMP). Alternatively, FUMP can be formed by a direct reaction of 5-FU with 5-phosphoribosyl-1-pyrophosphate (PRPP) catalyzed by the enzyme orotate phosphoribosyl transferase. Cellular kinases subsequently phosphorylate FUMP to its diphosphate (FUDP) and triphosphate (FUTP) forms, with FUTP subsequently incorporated into several forms of RNA by RNA polymerase.

• Deoxyribonucleotide Synthesis—The formation of FdUMP is critical to the antineoplastic activity of 5-FU. FdUMP can be formed by one of two pathways: (1) conversion of FUDP to 5-fluoro-2´-deoxyuridine-5´-diphosphate (FdUDP) by enzymatic activity of ribonucleotide reductase, or (2) direct conversion of 5-FU to 5-fluorouracil deoxyriboside (5-FUdR) by thymidine phosphorylase. Both are subsequently phosphorylated or dephosphorylated to FdUMP by thymidine kinase.

FdUMP appears to be responsible for much of the cytotoxicity of 5-FU. As a potent inhibitor of thymidylate synthase, it prevents the formation of thymidine monophosphate and thereby inhibits DNA synthesis.[3,4] Inhibition of thymidylate synthase by FdUMP depletes cellular stores of thymidine triphosphate, an important precursor of DNA. This results when FdUMP and 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate form a covalent ternary complex with thymidylate synthase. The stability of the fluorine-carbon bond blocks the transfer of the methylene group and the two hydrogen atoms from folate to dUMP and produces sustained inhibition of the enzymatic activity of thymidylate synthase.

5-FU Catabolism

The amount of 5-FU available for antineoplastic activity is directly regulated by its catabolism.[5,6] The initial and rate-limiting step in 5-FU catabolism is the reduction of the pyrimidine ring to 5-fluoroureidopropionic acid (FUPA) by hepatic dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). This enzyme is also found in the intestinal mucosa and other tissues. FUPA is subsequently converted to fluoro-beta-alanine by beta-alanine synthase. Following administration of an intravenous dose of 5-FU, the drug is rapidly catabolized by the liver, with the majority (60% to 90%) excreted in the urine as inactive metabolites.[6] Biliary excretion accounts for 2% to 3% of the total. Deficiency of DPD has been estimated to occur in 2% to 5% of the population and has the potential to dramatically increase the risk of 5-FU toxicity due to impaired clearance of the drug.[7,8]

Determinants of Fluoropyrimidine Efficacy

A number of clinical and metabolic factors determine the efficacy of the fluoropyrimidines. These include the sensitivity of the tumor, drug scheduling, cellular factors (eg, activity of the anabolic and catabolic enzymes, the presence of a pool of nucleotide precursors, folate and other cofactors, intact apoptotic pathways), and the particular formulation of 5-FU.

Pivotal Role of Thymidine Phosphorylase

Thymidine phosphorylase is a key enzyme in DNA synthesis and is responsible for the reversible conversion of thymidine to thymine. Thymidine phosphorylase is also a potent angiogenic growth factor and is identical to platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor.[9] Since thymidine phosphorylase can directly activate 5-FU by converting it to 5-FUdR, levels of thymidine phosphorylase are critical in the efficacy of fluoropyrimidines. Levels of thymidine phosphorylase are higher in a wide variety of solid tumors than in the adjacent nonneoplastic tissue. For these reasons, thymidine phosphorylase represents an attractive target for fluoropyrimidine therapy. Since the last step of capecitabine activation is by intratumoral thymidine phosphorylase, this selectivity can increase tumor cytotoxicity and decrease systemic exposure to the effects of 5-FU.

Intrinsic Mechanisms of Resistance

Some tumors are inherently more sensitive than others to the metabolic actions of 5-FU. For example, although gastrointestinal, breast, and head and neck cancers are relatively sensitive to 5-FU, the drug has little or no activity against malignant melanomas. In addition, resistance may develop during the course of disease. Mechanisms of resistance include insufficient delivery of drug to the target tissue, decreased anabolism of 5-FU to the nucleotide form, increased clearance of 5-FU nucleotides, alterations in the kinetics of thymidylate synthase, depletion of folate cofactors, and/or the level of the competing substrate, deoxyuridine monophosphate (dUMP).[10]

Strategies to Optimize 5-FU Therapy

Knowledge of 5-FU pharmacokinetics, cellular factors that contribute to resistance, and 5-FU metabolism provides an opportunity to modify drug scheduling, as well as to rationally design drugs that can increase the intrinsic efficacy of 5-FU.

• Pharmacokinetics—Fluorouracil shows significant and unpredictable differences in absorption following administration of an oral dose.[3] Consequently, the drug is not routinely administered by the oral route. However, it also shows significant variations in plasma concentration–time profiles after both intravenous bolus and infusion administration.[11] At higher doses, the nonlinear pharmacokinetics make it difficult to predict plasma levels and toxicity.

At least some of this pharmacokinetic variability may be due to individual differences in DPD enzymatic activity. Coadministration of 5-FU with DPD inhibitors such as eniluracil has the potential to minimize the variability of 5-FU pharmacokinetics between patients, decrease the circadian variation in 5-FU levels during continuous infusion therapy, and improve the therapeutic index of the drug.[3,12]

• Scheduling—The schedule of administration can have a significant effect on the efficacy and toxicity of 5-FU. Fluorouracil has been administered by oral, intravenous bolus, and continuous infusion techniques. Continuous infusion schedules are associated with a lower incidence of bone marrow and gastrointestinal toxicity. Although the therapeutic index of continuous infusion 5-FU vs bolus administration appears to be improved in patients with colorectal cancer, no improvement has been observed in survival rates.[13]

Scheduling may also influence the method of cell death following 5-FU therapy. Preclinical studies suggest that bolus administration may result in cell death that is more likely mediated by the disruption of RNA metabolism than by a thymidylate synthase–related mechanism.[14]

• Cellular Factors—A variety of cellular factors influence the efficacy of 5-FU therapy (Table 1).[15] The level and activity of thymidylate synthase, as well as intracellular folate pools, are critical factors in 5-FU activity. For example, in a series of patients with gastric cancer treated with 5-FU, the level of thymidylate synthase in the primary tumor was related to tumor response and survival.[16] In a group of patients with advanced colorectal cancer, intratumoral thymidylate synthase expression detected by immunohistochemistry was inversely correlated with tumor response to 5-FU chemotherapy (P = .0001).[17]

Intratumoral folate levels are also an important variable in determining response to 5-FU therapy. In a group of patients with head and neck cancers, all patients who responded to 5-FU therapy had intratumoral reduced folate levels above the median for the entire population.[18] Overexpression of DPD in tumor cells also appears to be an important factor in resistance to 5-FU in some patients. Indeed, the combination of high thymidylate synthase and high DPD levels in tumor cells appears to account for most cases of clinical resistance to 5-FU.

As discussed below, the effectiveness of capecitabine is critically dependent upon the intratumoral level of thymidine phosphorylase, the enzyme necessary for its intracellular activation.

• 5-FU Prodrugs—5-FU prodrugs offer the opportunity to alter the scheduling of the drug, improve pharmacokinetics, increase tumor specificity, and potentially improve the therapeutic index. Available and investigational 5-FU prodrugs include capecitabine, tegafur(Drug information on tegafur), UFT (a fixed 1:4 ratio of tegafur and uracil), S-1, and BOF-A2 (see Table 2).[3,19,20]

Pages: 1  2  3  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
IMAGE IQ

A 52-Year-Old Man Presents With an Erythematous Lesion
Cesar Moran, MD , May 22, 2013

A 52-year-old man presented with an erythematous lesion in the axilla of unknown duration. Surgical excision was performed. What is your diagnosis?

More Image IQs 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Five Steps to Improving Patient Access
Judy Capko,  May 21, 2013
Patient access is getting increased attention through reform initiatives. Here are five steps you can take to make sure patients get appropriate access to care in your office.
Growing HIPAA Threat – Ignore Windows XP at Your Own Peril
Marion K. Jenkins,  May 21, 2013
Chances are good that you have some major ticking software time bombs lurking in your medical practice's computer environment, namely Windows XP and Server 2003.
Finding Physician Work-Life Balance in the Small Moments
Jennifer Frank, MD,  May 21, 2013
At my practice and at home, things are always busy. There's laundry or homework, or a patient with needs.
Three Areas to Reduce Costs at Your Medical Practice
Greg Mertz,  May 19, 2013
By taking a hard look at reducing costs for staffing, overhead, and technology at your medical practice, you may see increased physician compensation.
Dos and Don’ts for Starting a Physician Blog
Michael Woo-Ming, MD,  May 18, 2013
Starting a physician blog can provide your medical practice with marketing benefits, but it's important to do it right.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • The ABCDEs of Moles and Melanomas
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • Bone Metastases
  • Palliative Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Bone Metastases Improves Quality of Life
  • Staying Fit Could Ward Off Lung and Colorectal Cancer for Middle-Age Men
  • Obesity Impairs Efficacy of L-Asparaginase in Leukemia Treatment
  • New AUA Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Screening
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Financial Toxicity, Part II: How Can We Help With the Burden of Treatment-Related Costs?
  • Patient Quality of Life Endpoints in Oncology Trials, Part II
  • Who's Coding Whom?
  • “How Do I Say This Nicely? Your Oncologist Wasn't Following Guidelines”
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • Cancer Metabolism as a Therapeutic Target
  • Study: Cholesterol Drugs Reduced Risk of Prostate Cancer Death
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • ONS: Safe Handling of Chemotherapy
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter



CancerNetwork on Facebook

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy