CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
 
CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
PATIENTS
NURSES
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home »

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 7 No. 10
 

ODAC Recommends Full FDA Approval for Camptosar

October 1, 1998

BETHESDA, Md--The Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) has unanimously recommended that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) grant full approval to Camptosar (irinotecan hydrochloride injection, Pharmacia & Upjohn) for the treatment of metastatic colon or rectal cancer that recurs or progresses after fluorouracil(Drug information on fluorouracil) (5-FU) therapy.

The FDA gave accelerated approval to Camptosar in 1996 on the basis of studies indicating it reduced tumor size. Accelerated approval requires the sponsoring company to conduct further studies on a drug, and failure to do so can lead to withdrawal of FDA approval. Backed by two new studies documenting that the drug prolongs survival in colorectal cancer, Pharmacia & Upjohn returned for a new hearing before the committee.

Camptosar is a collaborative development and marketing effort by four companies. The two randomized, prospective, multicenter phase III studies presented to the panel by Langdon Miller, MD, Phar-macia & Upjohn’s vice president and clinical director for oncology in the Americas, were sponsored by Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, which is also one of the four Camptosar partners.

Study V301 involved 279 patients; 189 received Camptosar and 90 received only best supportive care (BSC), which included antibiotics, analgesics, transfusions, corticosteroids, or anticancer agents other than the trial drug or another topo-isomerase I inhibitor. V302 included 256 patients, 127 randomized to Camptosar and 129 to one of three 5-FU regimens.

In both studies, the standard Camptosar dose was 350 mg/m² every 3 weeks, up from the 125 mg/m² weekly for 4 weeks with a 2-week rest currently used in the United States. Survival served as the primary endpoint in each study.

Median Survival

The median survival for the Camptosar group in V301 with 13 month follow-up was 9.2 months vs 6.5 months in the BSC arm. Camptosar patients had a 1-year survival of 36%, compared with 14% in the BSC arm. In V302, with 15 months of follow-up, median survival was 10.8 months for Camptosar patients and 8.5 months for the 5-FU group. One-year survival was 45% for the Camptosar group vs 32% for the 5-FU arm, Dr. Miller told the panel.

The FDA’s survival analysis generally agreed with that of the company. The agency put the median survival in V301 at 9.2 months for the Camptosar recipients vs 6.2 months for the BSC patients, and at 10.2 months in V302 for the Camptosar arm vs 8.4 for the 5-FU group. Camptosar "showed a consistent advantage for survival," said FDA reviewer Isagani Chico, MD.

In V301, 22% of the Camptosar patients experienced grade 3 and 4 neutro-penia and another 3% had neutropenia plus fever or infection. Other grade 3 and 4 adverse events that occurred more commonly in the Camptosar group included diarrhea (22% vs 6%), vomiting (14% vs 8%), cholinergic symptoms (12% vs 0%), and infection (9% vs 3%). Asthenia, at 19%, was slightly increased in the BSC arm over the 15% in the treatment group. Grade 3 and 4 abdominal pain and muco-sitis were similar in the two arms.

Grade 3 and 4 adverse events in V302 that were seen more commonly in the Camptosar group included diarrhea (22% vs 11% in 5-FU patients), neutropenia (14% vs 2%), neutropenia plus fever or infection (6% vs 2%), and vomiting (14% vs 5%). Asthenia, abdominal pain, mucositis, and cholinergic symptoms were similar in the two groups. Cutaneous signs, including hand-foot syndrome, and infections, were below 4% but more common among patients getting 5-FU.

Camptosar "has consistent activity in therapy of patients with previously treated colorectal cancer . . . can safely provide survival and quality of life benefits to these patients . . . and represents a new standard of care" in these patients, Dr. Miller told the committee.

"Two excellently designed and analyzed trials," Richard M. Simon, DSc, chief of NCI’s Biometric Research Branch, said after Dr. Miller’s presentation.

Dr. Chico said his analysis of the two studies showed "toxicity was expected, well accepted, and manageable." One committee member did express concern about an increased level of hospitalization among patients receiving Camptosar (60% were hospitalized at least once due to adverse events vs 63% of BSC patients and 39% of 5-FU patients).

However, the panel found the two trials demonstrated the drug’s efficacy and safety, and voted 7 to 0 to recommend full approval "for the treatment of metastatic carcinoma of the colon or rectum that has progress or recurred following 5-FU-based chemotherapy."

ODAC also recommended, by a 6 to 1 vote, that the FDA approve both the current 125 mg/m2 regimen and the 350 mg/m² regimen used in the studies.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

  • Bladder Cancer
  • Bone Metastases
  • Breast Cancer
  • CML
  • Colorectal Cancer
  • End-of-Life
  • GIST
  • Genetics Genomics
  • Gynecologic Cancers
  • Head & Neck Cancer
  • Integrative Oncology
  • Leukemia
  • Lung Cancer
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Nausea & Vomiting
  • Palliative Care
  • Pancreatic Cancer
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy
  • Prostate Cancer
  • RCC
  • Skin Cancer
  • Triple-Negative Breast
  • Testicular Cancer


More Topics 

 
PUBLICATIONS
ONCOLOGY Journal ONCOLOGY Nurse Edition Journal Cancer Management: A Multidisciplinary Approach

ONCOLOGY:
Perspectives on Best Practices

ONCOLOGY:
Nurse Edition

CANCER
MANAGEMENT
:
A Multidisciplinary
Approach


 
IMAGE IQ

This patient is at increased risk for which type of neoplasia?

A 28-year-old, slightly obese Caucasian woman presented with a long-standing history of intermittently painful “bumps” on both shoulders and her upper back.

 

More Image IQs:

 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Tax Schemes Every Physician Should Avoid
Ike Devji, JD, January 31, 2012
The next 60 days marks the final push to sell physicians across the United States tax plans of both good and questionable value.
Boosting Collections at Your Medical Practice: Whose Job Is It?
P.J. Cloud-Moulds, January 28, 2012
Embrace the relationship between your billing company and your medical practice staff.
Managing Difficult Medical Practice Employees
Shelly K. Schwartz, January 27, 2012
Tips for transforming immature staff members into great employees.
Prevent Physician Distraction When Using mHealth Technology
Aubrey Westgate, January 25, 2012
As more and more physicians use handheld mobile technology in their day-to-day work, some critics are raising concerns about “distracted doctoring.”
Can That Applicant Do the Job at Your Medical Practice?
Karen Zupko, January 25, 2012
If like many communities, yours has significant numbers of non-English speaking people with whom neither you nor your staff are able to converse, your practice is at a serious disadvantage.
 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Head and Neck Tumors
  • 46-Year-Old Woman Presents With Difficulty in Ambulation, and Swelling and Discoloration of Both Eyelids
  • Optimizing Outcomes of Advanced Prostate Cancer: Drug Sequencing and Novel Therapeutic Approaches
  • A 28-Year-Old Woman Presents With a Long-Standing History of Intermittently Painful “Bumps” on Both Her Shoulders and Upper Back
  • Controversies in Oncologist-Patient Communication: A Nuanced Approach to Autonomy, Culture, and Paternalism
  • Evolution of Treatment Options for Patients With CRPC and Bone Metastases: Bone-Targeted Agents That Go Beyond Palliation of Symptoms to Improve Overall Survival
  • Ending the Shortage of Generic Oncology Drugs
  • Processed and Red Meat Consumption Linked to Slight Increase in Risk of Pancreatic Cancer
  • New Mutation May Act as Driver in Subset of Lung Cancer Patients
  • Could Aspirin Be a Viable Adjuvant Treatment for Cancer?
  • Advances and New Research in the Treatment of Kidney Cancer
  • New Way to Predict Prostate Cancer Severity—Size of Prostate
  • Vismodegib Granted FDA Approval for Treatment of Basal Cell Carcinoma
  • FDA Grants Approval to Axitinib for the Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
  • Why BRAF-Mutated Colorectal Cancers Don't Respond to BRAF Inhibitors
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • When to Treat Myelodysplastic Syndromes
  • Are We Ready for Neoadjuvant Therapy in Potentially Resectable Pancreatic Cancer?
  • ASCO 2011: A Paradigm Shift in the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer
  • PSA Screening for Prostate Cancer Put Into Question By the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
  • When to Treat Myelodysplastic Syndromes
  • ASCO 2011: A Paradigm Shift in the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer
  • Are We Ready for Neoadjuvant Therapy in Potentially Resectable Pancreatic Cancer?
  • Evolving Therapeutic Paradigms for Advanced Prostate Cancer
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
JOB LISTINGS

Post a job

Powered by SearchMedica Jobs



CancerNetwork on Facebook

 

CancerNetwork | CME LLC | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2012 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy