CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home »

ONCOLOGY. Vol. 15 No. 2 3
Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Docetaxel/Gemcitabine: Salvage Chemotherapy in Anthracycline-Pretreated Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer

By

Vassilis A. Georgoulias, MD, PhD
Professor of Medical Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece

| February 1, 2001

Docetaxel (Taxotere) and gemcitabine (Gemzar) are active agents against breast cancer. Several phase I studies evaluated different schedules of their combination and clearly demonstrated that docetaxel and gemcitabine can be safely combined in either an every 3-week schedule or in a weekly and biweekly schedule. The toxicity profiles of these combinations were mainly grade 3 and 4 neutropenia and asthenia. Phase I studies also suggested that the docetaxel/gemcitabine combinations are active regimens in pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer. Three phase II studies of patients previously treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy reported a mean objective response rate of 46% and a mean overall survival of 13.5 months. Two of these trials enrolled patients with anthracycline-resistant or anthracycline-refractory disease; the objective responses using docetaxel/gemcitabine combination were 36% to 55% and 54%, respectively. It is noteworthy that objective responses were also achieved with this regimen in some patients who progressed while receiving taxane-based, front-line chemotherapy. These efficacy results were obtained with a mild toxicity profile. Adverse events were of short duration and easily manageable. Further studies are needed to evaluate this combination as front-line chemotherapy as well as second-line in well-defined subgroups of patients with advanced breast cancer. Furthermore, the combination should be compared with other more standard or investigational regimens. [ONCOLOGY 15(Suppl 3):18-24, 2001]


Introduction

Since metastatic breast cancer remains incurable despite temporary regression of the disease with endocrine therapy or chemotherapy, palliation of symptoms and prolongation of high-quality life become the major therapeutic goals in the treatment of these patients. Combination chemotherapy used as front-line treatment for metastatic disease usually results in 35% to 75% objective responses. However, the complete response rate is relatively low (approximately 10%) and the average duration of response only 8 months.[1] Moreover, when disease progression occurs, a standard second-line combination chemotherapy produces responses in 20% to 45% of patients, depending on whether an anthracycline was included in the initial treatment.[2,3]

Rationale

Docetaxel

Docetaxel (Taxotere) is a new semisynthetic taxane with significant anti-neoplastic activity and manageable toxicity, which consists primarily of myelosuppression. As front-line monotherapy for metastatic breast cancer, it produced an overall response rate of 59%; as second-line therapy it achieved 46%.[4] Even for patients who relapsed or progressed after prior anthracycline-based chemotherapy, the objective response rate was 41%.[5]

In addition, a randomized phase III study evaluated docetaxel(Drug information on docetaxel)/doxorubicin versus doxorubicin(Drug information on doxorubicin)/cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan, Neosar) as front-line chemotherapy of patients with metastatic breast cancer. The study demonstrated a significantly higher objective response rate (ORR) with docetaxel/doxorubicin (ORR = 60%) than with doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (ORR = 47%; P = .008).[6] Docetaxel has a unique mechanism of action; it disrupts mitosis, promotes microtubular assembly, and suppresses depolymerization of microtubular bundles to free tubulin.[7]

Gemcitabine

Gemcitabine (Gemzar) is a novel S-phase-specific, fluorine-substituted pyrimidine analog, phosphorylated by deoxycytidine kinase to the active diphosphate and triphosphate metabolites. Gemcitabine(Drug information on gemcitabine) diphosphate inhibits ribonucleotide reductase, which results in the depletion of the intracellular deoxycytidine triphosphate pools. Reduced deoxycytidine triphosphate levels promote the competitive incorporation of gemcitabine triphosphate into DNA, which results in the inhibition of further DNA synthesis by masked-chain termination.[8]

Gemcitabine has a broad range of activity against various tumors[9] and an especially favorable toxicity profile of mild myelosuppression and minimal nonhematologic toxicity.[10] When used as a single agent, response rates ranged from 25% to 46%, depending on the dose administered and whether patients had previously received chemotherapy.[11]

Combination Regimen

The distinct mechanisms of action, different intracellular targets, and activity of both docetaxel and gemcitabine against various tumors provided the rationale for their combination. Provided that pharmacologic antagonism does not occur and that clinically relevant doses of both drugs can be delivered together, the combination offers the potential for superior antitumor activity compared with the individual drugs.

This review presents data from phase I and II studies of the docetaxel/gemcitabine combination in patients with advanced breast cancer.

Phase I Studies

Weekly Gemcitabine and Monthly Docetaxel

Several phase I studies have evaluated the tolerance of different schedules of the docetaxel/gemcitabine combination in advanced breast cancer.

The first study of the combination by Spiridonidis et al[12] administered docetaxel at escalated doses (45, 60, 75, and 100 mg/m2) either on day 1 or day 15 while gemcitabine was given in a fixed dose (800 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15. The cycles were repeated every 4 weeks. In all, 40 patients were enrolled and 132 chemotherapy cycles were delivered with a mean of three cycles/patient (range: 1 to 11 cycles).

There were 27 and 13 patients enrolled in the day-1 and day-15 docetaxel schedules, respectively. In the day-15 schedule with docetaxel at dose levels of 45, 60, and 75 mg/m2, only 6 of the 13 patients were able to receive all of the planned gemcitabine administrations during the first cycle as per protocol. Overall, the day-15 dose was omitted in 9 of 35 docetaxel cycles because of thrombocytopenia and elevated liver enzymes, which occurred during the first cycle in seven patients. This excessive toxicity resulted in a decreased dose intensity of the drugs in the day-15 docetaxel schedule compared with the day-1 schedule, enabling the investigators to prematurely close this arm of the trial.

Conversely, using the day-1 schedule, docetaxel could be escalated to the dose of 100 mg/m2, which is the maximum tolerated dose for single-agent docetaxel.[10,11] In the day-1 docetaxel schedule, the day-8 gemcitabine dose was omitted in 19 cycles because of neutropenia (18 cycles) and thrombocytopenia (1 cycle). During the day-1 docetaxel schedule, the dose-limiting toxicity was reached at the dose of docetaxel 100 mg/m2 because of two episodes of febrile neutropenia and one of liver toxicity. Nonhematologic toxicity (asthenia) occurred in 30 patients; it was graded as moderate to severe in 15 patients. The onset of asthenia was unpredictable, and its severity did not appear to be cumulative. The fluid retention syndrome was relatively rare (only three patients presented with severe pedal edema). Grade 3 liver toxicity and grade 3 mucositis occurred in two patients each.

Different/Escalated Doses

Rischin et al[14] conducted a phase I trial evaluating different doses of gemcitabine (800, 1,000, and 1,200 mg/m2) given on days 1 and 8 in combination with escalated doses of docetaxel (60, 75, 85, and 100 mg/m2) given on day 8 in cycles of 21 days. The study enrolled 39 previously treated patients who received a total of 152 chemotherapy cycles (median: 4 cycles/patient; range: 1 to 8 cycles).

Dose-limiting toxicity was reached at docetaxel 100 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m2, since three of six enrolled patients developed dose-limiting toxicity events. One patient each experienced febrile neutropenia plus grade 3 asthenia, febrile neutropenia plus grade 3 mucositis, and febrile neutropenia plus grade 4 neutropenia lasting more than 7 days plus grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Neutropenia was the predominant hematologic toxicity, with grade 4 neutropenia occurring in 64% of patients; febrile neutropenia occurred in nine patients (seven in the first cycle) who experienced 11 episodes. Grade 4 neutropenia lasting for more than 7 days occurred in 14 cycles. Grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicity or thrombocytopenia was infrequent, with only one patient developing grade 4 skin toxicity.

The recommended doses for further phase II studies were defined as docetaxel 85 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m2 every 21 days. However, at this recommended level, 4 of 10 patients required treatment delay for a total of 11 out of 30 cycles because of slow neutrophil recovery.

Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
IMAGE IQ

A 52-Year-Old Man Presents With an Erythematous Lesion
Cesar Moran, MD , May 22, 2013

A 52-year-old man presented with an erythematous lesion in the axilla of unknown duration. Surgical excision was performed. What is your diagnosis?

More Image IQs 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Five Steps to Improving Patient Access
Judy Capko,  May 21, 2013
Patient access is getting increased attention through reform initiatives. Here are five steps you can take to make sure patients get appropriate access to care in your office.
Growing HIPAA Threat – Ignore Windows XP at Your Own Peril
Marion K. Jenkins,  May 21, 2013
Chances are good that you have some major ticking software time bombs lurking in your medical practice's computer environment, namely Windows XP and Server 2003.
Finding Physician Work-Life Balance in the Small Moments
Jennifer Frank, MD,  May 21, 2013
At my practice and at home, things are always busy. There's laundry or homework, or a patient with needs.
Three Areas to Reduce Costs at Your Medical Practice
Greg Mertz,  May 19, 2013
By taking a hard look at reducing costs for staffing, overhead, and technology at your medical practice, you may see increased physician compensation.
Dos and Don’ts for Starting a Physician Blog
Michael Woo-Ming, MD,  May 18, 2013
Starting a physician blog can provide your medical practice with marketing benefits, but it's important to do it right.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • The ABCDEs of Moles and Melanomas
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Therapy Innovations
  • A 52-Year-Old Man Presents With an Erythematous Lesion
  • Bone Metastases
  • Palliative Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Bone Metastases Improves Quality of Life
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Financial Toxicity, Part II: How Can We Help With the Burden of Treatment-Related Costs?
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • Conflicts of Interest in Medicine: What About Ties to Payers?
  • Planning Treatment for Women With Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • Cancer Metabolism as a Therapeutic Target
  • Study: Cholesterol Drugs Reduced Risk of Prostate Cancer Death
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter



CancerNetwork on Facebook

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy