CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home »

ONCOLOGY. Vol. 14 No. 10 9
 

UFT/Leucovorin Plus Weekly Irinotecan in Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

By

Georgia Schilling, MD, Rainer Lipp, MD, Susanna Hegewisch-Becker, MD, PhD, and Dieter Kurt Hossfeld, MD, PhD
Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

| October 1, 2000

This is an open-label, nonrandomized phase I trial to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan with a fixed dose of UFT plus oral leucovorin in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. A secondary objective of the study is to determine the response rate in this patient population. Adult patients with histologically confirmed advanced or metastatic colorectal carcinoma and no prior chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic disease, or those patients who have received adjuvant chemotherapy (> 6 months prior to the study entry) will be eligible to participate. All patients must have measurable or evaluable lesions. Symptoms will be evaluated at baseline and every 6 weeks thereafter. Computed tomography scans will be performed at baseline and every three cycles of treatment to assess tumor response. A total of six cycles of treatment may be given, depending on patient tolerance. Patients will be followed for a maximum of 12 months for time to progression, following the last dose of the study drug. Tumor response will be defined using standard World Health Organization criteria. [ONCOLOGY 14(Suppl 9):37-40, 2000]



Introduction

The combination of irinotecan(Drug information on irinotecan) (Camptosar, CPT-11), a topoisomerase I inhibitor, with fluorouracil(Drug information on fluorouracil) (5-FU) has been used successfully to treat advanced colorectal cancer. In large clinical trials there were significant advantages for this combination compared with 5-FU/leucovorin alone. The main toxicities and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of this combination were diarrhea, nausea, and neutropenia.

UFT (uracil and tegafur(Drug information on tegafur)) has shown efficacy in advanced colorectal cancer both as a single agent[1,2] and in combination with oral leucovorin (a combination being developed under the trade name Orzel).[3-5] UFT possesses significant benefits over 5-FU in terms of its route of administration, toxicity profile, and pharmacokinetics. Furthermore, UFT is well tolerated, is less myelosuppressive than 5-FU (< 5% for UFT compared with up to 20% for 5-FU), and results in a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting.[6-10]

Because of the oral administration of UFT plus leucovorin, there may be additional advantages for its combination with irinotecan.

The primary objectives of the study are the determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of irinotecan with a fixed dose of UFT plus oral leucovorin; establishment of the starting dose for the phase II study; determination of the side-effect profile; and assessment of the DLT of the combination of irinotecan and UFT plus leucovorin. Secondary objectives are the determination of the response rate in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer and the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan.

Study Design

This phase I, open-label, dose-escalation trial is designed to determine the safety, DLTs, and MTD of irinotecan with a fixed dose of UFT plus leuco-vorin in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer.

One cycle of treatment will be of a 6-week duration. A maximum of six cycles of treatment will be administered per cohort, as shown in Table 1.

Initially, three of six patients will be treated weekly for 4 weeks. The combined regimen will be followed by a 2-week rest period, thus ending the cycle. At the end of the first cycle, providing DLT occurs in one or fewer of three patients, the remaining three patients of the first cohort will be treated with the same dose schedule. If two or fewer of six patients in this cohort experience a DLT, the dose level of irinotecan will be escalated for the next cohort of three to six patients; otherwise dose escalation stops. If no DLTs are observed in the first three patients of the cohort, this cohort level will close and the next three patients will begin treatment in the second cohort. This will be the case in all cohorts if no DLTs are observed in the first three patients (Figure 1).

The patients in each cohort will continue to receive the assigned dose schedule until disease progression is determined or unacceptable toxicity occurs, for a maximum of six cycles. Cohorts of three to six patients will be treated at each dose level until the MTD is reached. The MTD of irinotecan in combination with UFT plus leucovorin is defined as that dose level at which DLTs occur in more than two of six patients. Having established the MTD, the cohort below the MTD (starting dose for phase II) will be expanded to include 20 patients to more fully characterize the toxicity profile.

Inclusion Criteria

Inclusion criteria are as follows: (1) histologically confirmed advanced or metastatic colorectal carcinoma; (2) adjuvant chemotherapy (> 6 months prior to study entry); (3) no prior chemotherapy, but disease for which treatment with fluoropyrimidine or topoisomerase I inhibitors may be appropriate; (4) measurable or evaluable disease; (5) male or female (with negative pregnancy test); (6) age ³ 18 years; (7) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2; (8) adequate serum chemistry; (9) adequate bone marrow function; (10) possible follow-up of the patient; and (11) patient’s consent according to local Ethics Committee requirements.

Exclusion Criteria

Exclusion criteria are as follows (1) prior radiotherapy except palliative radiotherapy for control of symptomatic disease; (2) life-threatening toxicities as a result of fluoropyrimidine treatment; (3) medical or psychiatric contradiction; (4) known brain metastases; (5) ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease; (6) pregnant or breast-feeding women, or women not using adequate methods of birth control; (7) any condition or therapy that may pose a risk to the patient or interfere with study objectives; and (8) any other investigational drug given within 30 days of initiation of therapy, and participation in other clinical studies.

Conclusions

Two patients have been enrolled in the first treatment level to date. Study recruitment is ongoing. The first results will be expected in a few months.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.





1. Malik STA, Talbot D, Clark PI, et al: Phase II trial of UFT in advanced colorectal and gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 62:1023-1025, 1990.

2. Ota K, Taguchi T, Kimura K, et al: Report on nationwide pooled data and cohort investigation in UFT phase II study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 22:333-338, 1980.

3. Saltz LB, Leichman CG, Young CW, et al: A fixed-ratio combination of uracil and ftorafur (UFT) with low-dose leucovorin. An active oral regimen for advanced colorectal cancer. Cancer 75:782-785, 1995.

4. Gonzales-Baron M, Feliu J, de la Gandara I, et al: Efficacy of oral tegafur modulation by uracil and leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer. A phase II study. Eur J Cancer 31A:2215-2219, 1995.

5. Pazdur R, Lassere Y, Rhodes V, et al: Phase II trial of uracil and tegafur plus oral leucovorin: An effective oral regimen in the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 12:2269-2300, 1994.

6. Pazdur R, Douillard JY, Skillings JR, et al: Multicenter phase III study of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or UFT in combination with leucovorin (LV) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (abstract 1009). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 18:263a, 1999.

7. Carmichael J, Popiela T, Radstone D, et al: Randomized comparative study of ORZEL (oral uracil/tegafur {UFT] plus leucovorin [LV] versus parenteral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus LV in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (abstract 1015). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 18:264a, 1999.

8. Meropol NJ, Rustum YM, Petrelli NJ, et al: A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of oral uracil, ftorafur, and leucovorin in patients with advanced cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 37:581-586, 1996.

9. Diasio RB: Improving fluorouracil chemotherapy with novel orally administered fluoropyrimidines. Drugs 58:(suppl 3):119-126, 1999.

10. Macdonald JS: Oral fluoropyrimidines: A closer look at their toxicities. Am J Clin Oncol 22:475-480, 1999.


 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
IMAGE IQ

A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
Brian Morse, MD1 , June 10, 2013

A 48-year-old female presents with complaints of irregular vaginal bleeding and postcoital bleeding. Images from a PET/CT and pelvis MRI reveal characteristic findings. What is your diagnosis?

More Image IQs 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Soluble HER2 Levels Prognostic Factor in HER2+ Breast Cancer
  • ASCO: PD-L1 Antibody Elicits Durable Response in RCC
  • RECORD-3: Sunitinib Still Standard First-Line Treatment in Metastatic RCC
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • ASCO: Vinegar Screening Significantly Reduces Cervical Cancer Mortality
  • ASCO: Sulforaphane in Prostate Cancer Found Worthy of Further Investigation
  • Study: Recurrent Heartburn Ups Risk for Throat Cancer
  • Radiation-Induced Enteritis: Incidence, Mechanisms, and Management
  • HER2-Directed Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation: The Current State of Our Knowledge
  • It’s Time for Clinicians to Reconsider Their Proscription Against the Use of Soyfoods by Breast Cancer Patients
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter



CancerNetwork on Facebook

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy