CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » Gastrointestinal Cancers » Esophageal Cancer

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 13 No. 8 2
Identification of patients at risk of local failure 

Role of Selective Dose Escalation and Addition of Cytoprotection Evaluated in Patients With Esophageal Cancer

By Program Chairman
Walter J. Curran, Jr., MD
Kimmel Cancer Center of Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia | August 1, 2004

PORTLAND, OR-A treatment- intensification study in esophageal cancer patients that includes an additional boost of radiotherapy in combination with fluorouracil(Drug information on fluorouracil) (5-FU), carboplatin(Drug information on carboplatin) (Paraplatin) and paclitaxel(Drug information on paclitaxel) (Taxol), and amifostine(Drug information on amifostine) (Ethyol) has met with early difficulties, and accrual has been stopped pending longer follow-up, reports Steven K. Seung, MD, PhD, a radiation oncologist at the Oregon Clinic, in Portland. The addition of amifostine is an attempt to build on promising results of an earlier selective dose-escalation study in patients with esophageal cancer by using cytoprotection to reduce treatment- related morbidity and mortality. Dr. Seung first discussed the earlier INT-0123 study, which increased the radiation dose to 64.8 Gy vs the standard 50.4 Gy. In this trial, 31% of patients survived 2 years, but less than 50% of patients had local control, and mortality in the high-dose arm was greater owing to complications. "High-dose chemoradiotherapy may be too toxic, perhaps because prolonging the chemothera- py may have been too arduous for these patients," Dr. Seung said. "We decided first to try a fast-andhard approach by giving a shorter course of intensified chemoradia- tion and then selectively escalating the dose for patients who do not have a good clinical response to standard-dose radiotherapy." Radiation Dose Escalation
The prospective study design assessed survival and failure patterns of patients treated with conventional 50.4 Gy radiotherapy and carboplatin/5-FU/paclitaxel, then selectively escalated the radiation dose in patients who had less than a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to initial treatment, with a PR defined as a 50% reduction in maximal dimension of tumor and negative biopsy. The researchers enrolled 18 patients with T1-4, N0-1, M0-1a esophageal cancer. "Most were adenocarcinomas, reflecting the change in the natural history of this disease," Dr. Seung said. Approximately 6 to 8 weeks after initial chemoradiotherapy, patients underwent repeat staging with computed tomography (CT) scan, esophageal ultrasound, and biopsy. Those with less than a PR received a boost dose of 900 cGy with concurrent paclitaxel/ carboplatin/continuous infusion 5-FU. Patients were followed every 4 months with CT and endoscopy for the first year and every 6 months thereafter. With a median follow-up of 19 months, 11 of 18 patients had attained CR or PR, Dr. Seung reported. Six of 18 received a boost. One patient died of heart failure prior to completing the initial course. Overall survival was 30% at 3 years, with a median survival duration of 25 months, despite 39% of the patients having stage IVA disease. "Patients with weight loss greater than 10% had lower survival in this study and in other trials," Dr. Seung said (see Figure 1). One factor in weight loss was acute esophagitis. One patient had grade 4 esophagitis, 7 patients had grade 3 esophagitis (none required feeding tubes), and 16 had grade 2 esophagitis. Amifostine Added
"This protocol allows screening of patients at risk for local failure, allowing selection of high-risk patients to undergo dose-escalation. Reducing the acute side effects may further improve compliance and outcome, which raised the question of a role for amifostine," Dr. Seung said. The investigators then decided to add amifostine 500 mg SC prior to each dose of radiotherapy, which was given at 1.8 Gy 5 days per week for 5.5 weeks (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions). The first four patients treated with this approach all had to stop receiving amifostine prior to completion of treatment. Two had generalized rash, one had nausea and hypotension, and one had arrhythmia. Tumor recurred within 4 months in one of these four patients but has not recurred at 2, 6, and 7 months of follow-up in the other three patients.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.





The 4th International Cytoprotection Investigators' Congress


 
RELATED CONTENT

ASCO GI: Docetaxel for Advanced Esophagogastric Adenocarcinoma Improves Survival in Second-Line Setting
January 25, 2013
More Data Showing Aspirin Can Help Prevent Cancer
March 21, 2012
MUNICON-II: Early FDG-PET Scan Predicts Esophageal Ca Response to Therapy
March 3, 2011
Targeted Therapy: an Evolving Concept in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
ONCOLOGY,  November 8, 2010
Preoperative Therapy in Esophageal Cancer: Controversy and Consensus
ONCOLOGY,  November 8, 2010
 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
   SEARCH MEDICA RX
   Browse drugs by name:
A B C D E F G H I J
K L M N O P Q R S T
U V W X Y Z All      
   Search for drugs:
Search

 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Primary Care Can't Thrive Without Nurse Practitioners
Courtney H. Lyder, ND,  May 17, 2013
With a projected shortfall of primary-care physicians, it's time for alternate solutions to patient care. Nurse practitioners are one logical remedy.
VWhat Physicians Can Learn from the Allscripts EHR Lawsuit
Marisa Torrieri,  May 16, 2013
Lawsuit prompts question: What should physicians do to ensure they end up with a great EHR instead of buyer’s remorse?
Eight Ways ICD-9 Will Still Matter to Medical Practices
Brenda Edwards, CPC,  May 15, 2013
What should your medical practice do with your ICD-9-CM book after October 1, 2014? Keep it.
Seven Ways Technology Can Speed Up Patient Collections
Cheyenne Brinson,  May 15, 2013
Failing to adopt widely available billing and collections technology can cost medical practices big. Here's how to do it right.
Four Reasons Private Medical Practice is Becoming Extinct
Carol Stryker,  May 15, 2013
It’s becoming increasingly difficult for private medical practices to thrive. Here’s what’s driving the trend toward consolidation.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Skin Lesions
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • New AUA Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Screening
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • Genomics Studies Identify Testicular Cancer Risk Variants
  • Lower Back Pain in an Elderly Man With a History of Localized Prostate Cancer
  • FDA Approves Erlotinib (Tarceva) as First-Line Lung Cancer Therapy for Certain Patients
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Financial Toxicity, Part II: How Can We Help With the Burden of Treatment-Related Costs?
  • Patient Quality of Life Endpoints in Oncology Trials, Part II
  • Who's Coding Whom?
  • “How Do I Say This Nicely? Your Oncologist Wasn't Following Guidelines”
  • Cancer Metabolism as a Therapeutic Target
  • Study: Cholesterol Drugs Reduced Risk of Prostate Cancer Death
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • ONS: Safe Handling of Chemotherapy
  • Financial Toxicity, Part II: How Can We Help With the Burden of Treatment-Related Costs?
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter



CancerNetwork on Facebook
 
SearchMedica Search Result

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on Esophageal Cancer
Evidence on Esophageal Cancer
Guidelines on Esophageal Cancer
Patient Education on Esophageal Cancer
Clinical Trials on Esophageal Cancer
Practical Articles on Esophageal Cancer
Research and Reviews on Esophageal Cancer
All "Esophageal Cancer" results
CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy