CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
 
CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
PATIENTS
NURSES
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » Esophageal Cancer

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 17 No. 4
 

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy beneficial in esophageal cancer pts

By Caroline Helwick | April 1, 2008

ORLANDO—The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable esophageal cancer was bolstered by the results of two trials presented at the 2008 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium.

Long-term follow-up of the MRC OE02 trial in the United Kingdom confirms that preoperative chemotherapy improves disease-free survival, compared with surgery alone, and should be considered a standard of care, said William H. Allum, MD, consultant surgeon, GI Surgery Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London (abstract 9).

In the study, 802 patients were randomized to surgery alone or two cycles of combination cisplatin(Drug information on cisplatin) 80 mg/m2 on day 1 and 5-FU 1 g/m2/d on days 1-4 before surgery. The initial results, reported in Lancet (359:1727-1733, 2002), showed significant advantages for disease-free and overall survival at 3 years. Two-year survival was 43% with neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs 34% with surgery alone.

This update, with median follow-up of 6 years, showed that the results were maintained long-term. Recurrences were reduced by 18% (P = .003) and mortality was reduced by 16% (P = .03). Overall survival at 5 years was 23% with neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs 17% with surgery alone, Dr. Allum reported.

As in the initial analysis, the difference in survival in favor of neoadjuvant chemotherapy remained consistent in both patients with adenocarcinoma (5-year survival 24% vs 17%) and squamous cell carcinoma (23% vs 18%). The treatment effect was maintained across stratification variables of age, sex, and tumor site.

An evaluation of all patients by resection status showed a substantial benefit for patients in whom a macroscopically complete resection was possible and surgical margins were clear (R0), compared with patients who had positive margins (R1) or those whose resection was incomplete (R2). Three-year survival rates in these subsets were 42%, 18%, and 9%, respectively, and median survival was 2.1, 1.1, and 0.8 years, respectively.

Dr. Allum noted that comparing survival between treatment arms by resection status would be inappropriate, due to the downstaging effect of preoperative chemotherapy.

An ongoing UK trial (OE05) is addressing the question of the most appropriate chemotherapy combination for these patients.

Japanese study

Japanese investigators concluded from study JCOG 9907 that preoperative chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-FU followed by surgery is superior to postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with the same regimen (abstract 10) and can be regarded as a standard of care. Their previous trial, JCOG 9204, showed that adjuvant chemotherapy improved survival over surgery alone in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

JCOG 9907 randomized 330 patients with stage II-III squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus to two cycles of chemotherapy with cisplatin (80 mg/m2 on day 1) plus 5-FU (800 mg/m2/d on days 1-5) followed by surgery or to surgery followed by the same regimen. Median follow-up was 23 months.

At a planned interim analysis in March 2007, median progression-free survival was 3 years for the preoperative chemotherapy arm and 2 years for the postoperative chemotherapy arm, representing a 24% reduction in risk

(P = .044), which did not meet stopping criteria, reported Nobutoshi Ando, MD, of the Tokyo Dental College, Ichikawa General Hospital. However, the reseachers observed an “unexpectedly large difference” in 5-year overall survival, a secondary endpoint, Dr. Ando said: 60% and 38%, respectively, for a 36% reduction in risk with preoperative treatment (P = .013).

There was no significant increase in adverse events with the preoperative approach, and no significant interaction between nodal status and treatment effect.

Based on these findings, the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee recommended early termination of the study and publication of the results.

Preoperative chemotherapy also induced downstaging and the ability to achieve R0 margin status. The survival benefit occurred primarily in patients with stage II disease, he added.

VantagePoint

Several standards of care for resectable esophageal ca

Susan G. Urba, MD — The trials from the UK and Japan reached a similar important conclusion: “There is a survival benefit for preoperative chemotherapy in esophageal cancer,” said Dr. Urba, of the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center.

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network was concerned that the survival benefit observed in MRC OE02 might not hold up, she said. After a median follow-up of 6 years, the survival benefit was indeed maintained.

Dr. Urba noted that the size of this trial—802 subjects—contributed to the strength of the data. One weakness, she said, is that the study lacked information about disease stage.

The study also showed the importance of resection status. “Survival in patients with R0 resection is two to three times longer than in patients with positive margins,” she said. Also, there was no difference in 5-year survival between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.

Concern about Japanese study

Dr. Urba expressed concern that in the Japanese study, a disproportionate number of patients per arm did not receive or complete their assigned treatments: 53% in the postoperative arm vs 12% in the preoperative arm. “Were the benefits for preoperative therapy due to better delivery of the drug?” she asked.

Interestingly, she said, postop chemotherapy in the original Japanese trial resulted in the same 5-year survival rate (61%) as preop chemotherapy in the second trial. “I personally favor preop delivery because you can get more chemotherapy into the patients before they become too debilitated,” Dr. Urba said.

NCCN guidelines

The NCCN guidelines do not currently recommend pre- or postoperative chemotherapy as the standard of care. “Their primary recommendation is for treatments that involve chemoradiation,” she said.

Dr. Urba concluded that there are “several standards of care, influenced by geographical location, patient status, and institutional bias.”

Preoperative chemotherapy is more often used in Europe and Asia; preoperative chemoradiation in the US. Postop chemoradiation is also a standard, especially for cancer of the GE junction not treated preoperatively. Definitive chemoradiation without surgery is also a standard of care, she added, particularly in institutions lacking a thoracic surgeon experienced in esophagectomies and for patients unfit for surgery.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.

  • Oldest First
  • Newest First

by Claude Poliakoff, MD FACS, retired | April 24, 2010 3:46 PM EDT

Given the D-dimer diminution following cancerous esophagectomy, the question of DVT incidence in the 2 studies quoted are of interest. Theoretically the post op chemo/rad group would have lower DVT risk than the pre-op chemo/rad group. If hypothesis is confrimed, pre-op group cost would be higher than post-op group.






 
RELATED CONTENT

MUNICON-II: Early FDG-PET Scan Predicts Esophageal Ca Response to Therapy
March 3, 2011
Targeted Therapy: an Evolving Concept in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
ONCOLOGY,  November 8, 2010
Preoperative Therapy in Esophageal Cancer: Controversy and Consensus
ONCOLOGY,  November 8, 2010
Multimodality Therapy for Esophageal Cancer
ONCOLOGY,  November 8, 2010
Oral Bisphosphonates Not Linked to Esophageal Cancer Risk
Oncology NEWS International,  September 2, 2010
 
TOPIC INDEX

  • Bladder Cancer
  • Bone Metastases
  • Breast Cancer
  • CML
  • Colorectal Cancer
  • End-of-Life
  • GIST
  • Genetics Genomics
  • Gynecologic Cancers
  • Head & Neck Cancer
  • Integrative Oncology
  • Leukemia
  • Lung Cancer
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Nausea & Vomiting
  • Palliative Care
  • Pancreatic Cancer
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy
  • Prostate Cancer
  • RCC
  • Skin Cancer
  • Triple-Negative Breast
  • Testicular Cancer


More Topics 


 
   SEARCH MEDICA RX
   Browse drugs by name:
A B C D E F G H I J
K L M N O P Q R S T
U V W X Y Z All      
   Search for drugs:
Search

 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
'What They Should Really Teach in Medical School'
Julie Schopps, MD , February 6, 2012
The North Carolina-based pediatrician weighs in on why she thinks the real learning doesn't take place until students are out of the classroom.
Improve EHR Systems by Rethinking Medical Billing
Daniel Essin, MA, MD, February 6, 2012
Separating billing-related data from other clinical documentation and transmitting it to a billing system is not difficult …no matter how the charting is done.
Keeping Your Medical Practice’s Accounts Receivable on Track
P.J. Cloud-Moulds, February 4, 2012
Here are the minimum reports you should be running to keep an eye on your practices A/R.
Healthcare Providers Play Crucial Role in Helping Victims of Abuse
Stephen Hanson, PA-C , February 3, 2012
I would urge each and every one of you to be familiar with the warning signs of abuse, and the resources available to you all as healthcare providers.
Protecting Your Medical Practice's Data
Marisa Torrieri, February 3, 2012
Here's the scoop on how to implement a good data-backup plan at your office.
 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Management of Brain Metastases: Neurosurgical Considerations
  • Optimizing Outcomes of Advanced Prostate Cancer: Drug Sequencing and Novel Therapeutic Approaches
  • Head and Neck Tumors
  • A 28-Year-Old Woman Presents With a Long-Standing History of Intermittently Painful “Bumps” on Both Her Shoulders and Upper Back
  • Controversies in Oncologist-Patient Communication: A Nuanced Approach to Autonomy, Culture, and Paternalism
  • Ending the Shortage of Generic Oncology Drugs
  • Processed and Red Meat Consumption Linked to Slight Increase in Risk of Pancreatic Cancer
  • Controversies in Oncologist-Patient Communication: A Nuanced Approach to Autonomy, Culture, and Paternalism
  • Younger Breast Cancer Patients Have More Adverse Quality of Life Issues
  • New Way to Predict Prostate Cancer Severity—Size of Prostate
  • AL Amyloidosis: Who, What, When, Why, and Where
  • The Maze of PARP Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer
  • The Circuitous Path of PARP Inhibitor Development in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
  • Podcast: Dr. David Ahlquist on Advances in Colorectal Cancer Screening
  • Lung Cancer Screening: A New Era
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • When to Treat Myelodysplastic Syndromes
  • ASCO 2011: A Paradigm Shift in the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer
  • PSA Screening for Prostate Cancer Put Into Question By the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
  • PSA Screening for Prostate Cancer Put Into Question By the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
  • When to Treat Myelodysplastic Syndromes
  • ASCO 2011: A Paradigm Shift in the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer
  • Are We Ready for Neoadjuvant Therapy in Potentially Resectable Pancreatic Cancer?
  • Evolving Therapeutic Paradigms for Advanced Prostate Cancer
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter



CancerNetwork on Facebook

 

 
SearchMedica Search Result

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on Esophageal Cancer
Evidence on Esophageal Cancer
Guidelines on Esophageal Cancer
Patient Education on Esophageal Cancer
Clinical Trials on Esophageal Cancer
Practical Articles on Esophageal Cancer
Research and Reviews on Esophageal Cancer
All "Esophageal Cancer" results
CancerNetwork | CME LLC | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2012 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy