CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » Gynecologic Cancers

ONCOLOGY. Vol. 9 No. 2
Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

The Effect of Tamoxifen on the Endometrium

By Richard R. Barakat, MD1 | January 31, 1995
1Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York

ABSTRACT: Tamoxifen(Drug information on tamoxifen) (Nolvadex), a nonsteroidal antiestrogen, was first approved by the FDA for the treatment of patients with breast cancer in 1978. Large clinical trials have demonstrated a recurrence-free and overall survival benefit in both pre- and postmenopausal women. Long-term adjuvant tamoxifen is the endocrine treatment of choice for selected patients with breast cancer, and large-scale trials are currently underway to evaluate its role as a chemopreventive agent in healthy women at risk for breast cancer. Consequently, a large number of women will be subjected to both the benefits and potential risks of long-term tamoxifen therapy. One of the most significant potential complications is the development of endometrial cancer. The estimated annual risk of endometrial cancer in tamoxifen-treated patients is approximately 2 per 1,000 women. Most of these cancers will be detected at an early stage when they are highly curable. The potential benefit of tamoxifen treatment in breast cancer patients outweighs this risk; however, all patients receiving tamoxifen should undergo regular gynecologic evaluations. [ONCOLOGY 9(2):129-142]

Introduction

Tamoxifen (Nolvadex), a nonsteroidal antiestrogen, has been widely used for the management of patients with breast cancer since the 1970s. It is believed to exert its main effect by blocking the binding of estrogen to the estrogen receptor. Although primarily an antiestrogen, tamoxifen may also exhibit some mild estrogenic effects. Since the initial report by Killackey et al [1] suggesting a possible link between tamoxifen use and the development of endometrial carcinoma in three patients, approximately 133 additional cases of tamoxifen-associated uterine cancer have been reported [2-13]. Most recently, the results of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-14 trial were published [12]. This randomized trial of tamoxifen versus placebo in women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer confined to the breast with negative axillary nodes revealed a 7.5-fold increase in the risk of developing endometrial cancer in the tamoxifen-treated group.

(MORE: Commentary (Look): The Effect of Tamoxifen on the Endometrium)

The indications for tamoxifen use have broadened to include long-term adjuvant therapy as well as preventive therapy for selected high-risk women. Consequently, a large number of women, including healthy young patients with no history of cancer, will be subjected to the long-term effects of tamoxifen. This review evaluates the current literature regarding tamoxifen use in breast cancer patients and associated uterine neoplasia, and discusses the role of screening for endometrial cancer in tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients.

Laboratory Data

Several preclinical studies have indicated that tamoxifen may indeed exert an estrogenic effect on the endometrium. Satyaswaroop et al [14] transplanted both ER-positive and ER-negative human endometrial cancer cell lines into nude mice and evaluated the effect of both tamoxifen and 17-beta-estradiol on tumor growth. Although the ER-negative tumor grew rapidly, there was no difference in the rate of tumor growth between tamoxifen- and estrogen-treated animals, compared with controls. In contrast, the rate of growth of the ER-positive cell line was significantly accelerated in the tamoxifen-treated animals, compared with controls, although to a lesser degree than was seen with estrogen treatment. In addition, tamoxifen increased the levels of functional progesterone(Drug information on progesterone) receptors, providing further evidence for the estrogenic potential of tamoxifen.

Gottardis et al [15] demonstrated in athymic mice the contrasting actions of tamoxifen on the growth of ER-positive breast and endometrial cancer cell lines. While stimulating the growth of the endometrial tumor, tamoxifen had no effect on breast tumor growth and had an antagonistic action on the estradiol(Drug information on estradiol)-stimulated growth of breast tumors.

Clinical Studies

The estrogenic effect of tamoxifen on the female genital tract has also been demonstrated clinically. Boccardo et al [16] investigated the estrogen-like effect of tamoxifen on the vaginal epithelium. Hormonal evaluation of the female patient can be determined by means of exfoliative vaginal cytology using the karyopyknotic index (KPI), which is the relation of mature superficial cells to intermediate cells. Postmenopausal estrogen replacement therapy generally induces increased cellular maturity and, consequently, increases the KPI. After at least 8 weeks of tamoxifen treatment, treated patients had a significantly higher KPI than did untreated patients, suggesting an estrogenic effect of tamoxifen on the vaginal epithelium.

Endometrial Polyps and Hyperplasia

Several recent reports have implicated tamoxifen treatment in the development of endometrial polyps and hyperplasia (Table 1 ). Lahti et al [9] performed transvaginal sonography, hysteroscopy, and endometrial curettage on 103 postmenopausal breast cancer patients; 51 had received tamoxifen at 20 to 40 mg/day for a median of 30 months, while 52 had received no hormonal treatment. The patients were matched with respect to age, parity, time since menopause, body mass index, and concomitant medical conditions. Compared with control subjects, the tamoxifen-treated patients had a significantly thicker mean endometrial width (10.4 mm versus 4.2 mm) and a larger uterine volume, as determined by transvaginal sonography. However, they also had a higher incidence of uterine fibroids.

The percentage of endometrial polyps was significantly higher in the tamoxifen-treated group, compared with controls (36% vs 10%). Of the 43 patients in the tamoxifen-treated group who had an endometrial thickness of 5 mm or more, 17 (39.5%) had endometrial polyps; however, 22 (51.2%) had no abnormal pathologic findings. Two patients in the tamoxifen group had endometrial hyperplasia, and one patient had endometrial cancer at the time of curettage. Two patients in the control group also had endometrial cancer. All significant endometrial pathology was found in asymptomatic patients with an endometrial width greater than 5 mm on transvaginal sonography. If transvaginal sonography were used as a screening method for endometrial cancer with the abnormal cutoff limit set at 5 mm, approximately 50% of patients would undergo endometrial sampling unnecessarily.

Since endometrial polyps often contain hyperplastic endometrial glands, their etiology is thought to be the presence of endogenous or exogenous estrogenic activity. The authors therefore concluded that long-term tamoxifen use is associated with estrogenic side effects manifested by an increased occurrence of polyps. This study failed to demonstrate any increase in precancerous or cancerous endometrial lesions associated with tamoxifen treatment.

Other Studies—Other authors have also reported a higher incidence of endometrial polyps and hyperplasia in tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients. Corley et al [17] reported on four tamoxifen-treated patients who developed unusual endometrial polyps characterized by cystically dilated glands and stromal decidualization. These findings were not confirmed in the 17 cases of endometrial polyps reported by Lahti et al [9].

Gal et al [18] reported an 18% incidence of endometrial hyperplasia in random endometrial biopsies obtained from 38 breast cancer patients who had received tamoxifen at a dosage of 20 mg/day for at least 12 months. Thirty-two patients (46%) who were initially eligible for study could not participate, as endometrial samples could not be obtained due to atrophic changes. In the second phase of the study, the authors performed endometrial biopsies prospectively on 11 patients at 4- to 6-month intervals. Three (28%) of these patients developed endometrial hyperplasia following 6, 10, and 12 months of tamoxifen use. Again, 40% of the patients initially eligible for study could not participate due to inability to undergo an endometrial biopsy. The 20% overall incidence of endometrial hyperplasia reported by Gal et al [18] was higher than the 4% incidence noted by Lahti et al [9] in 51 tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients.

Gibson et al [19] recently reported the results of a retrospective review of endometrial pathology found at dilatation and curettage (D&C) performed in 240 breast cancer patients. Seventy-five (31%) of these patients had received tamoxifen, 20 mg/day, for a mean duration of 26 months as therapy for their breast cancer. Patients in this study were stratified as symptomatic (abnormal bleeding) or asymptomatic (curettage performed as part of another procedure or due to the presence of a thickened endometrial stripe on ultrasound examination).

Among tamoxifen users who were symptomatic at the time of D&C, the incidence of endometrial polyps was 15%; hyperplasia, 2%; and adenocarcinoma, 11%; compared with an incidence of 13%, 4%, and 11%, respectively, for nonusers. Among asympto- matic patients receiving tamoxifen, the incidence of polyps, hyperplasia, and adenocarcinoma was 9%, 0%, and 0%, while nonusers had an incidence of 5%, 4%, and 0%, respectively. All of the cases of endometrial carcinoma were associated with abnormal vaginal bleeding. The 11% incidence of endometrial carcinoma in this study was comparable to what has been reported for all patients presenting with postmenopausal bleeding in the general population [20].

The mean duration of tamoxifen use in those patients found to have adenocarcinoma was 44 months, compared with 18 months in those patients with polyps, and 19 months in the patient with hyperplasia. This difference was not statistically significant, possibly due to small numbers. The authors concluded that short-term tamoxifen use at the 20 mg/day dosage level was not associated with a higher incidence of abnormal pathology, as detected at the time of D&C in breast cancer patients.

Breast Cancer Prevention Trials—Recently, large-scale randomized trials of tamoxifen as a chemopreventive agent have been initiated in England and the United States for women considered to be at high risk for developing breast cancer based on family history. Kedar et al [21] recruited a randomized cohort of 111 postmenopausal women from the Pilot Breast Cancer Prevention Trial at the Royal Marsden Hospital, to study the effect of tamoxifen on the uterus and ovaries. Sixty-one patients had received tamoxifen at 20 mg/day for a median of 22 months, while 50 had received placebo for a median of 24 months. Eight patients in each group were receiving estrogen replacement therapy at the time of study.

All patients underwent endovaginal sonography with color Doppler imaging, after which an endometrial biopsy was performed. The tamoxifen group was found to have a significantly larger uterine volume and a lower impedance to blood flow in the uterine arteries. Patients were not, however, stratified as to the presence of uterine fibroids. In addition, the tamoxifen-treated group had a significantly thicker mean endometrial diameter (9.1 mm versus 4.8 mm). On endometrial biopsy, 10 patients (16%) in the tamoxifen-treated group were found to have atypical endometrial hyperplasia, while five (8%) had endometrial polyps. None of the patients in the control group had hyperplasia on endometrial biopsy, and only one patient had an endometrial polyp. No patient in either group had evidence of endometrial carcinoma. The predictive value of an endometrial thickness 8 mm or larger for atypical hyperplasia or polyps was 100% (16/16), suggesting a possible screening role for transvaginal sonography in breast cancer patients receiving tamoxifen.

Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.

  • Oldest First
  • Newest First

by KERRI CONNELL | November 04, 2012 7:04 AM EST

As a 35 year old, I took Tamoxifen from 2003 to 2008 after breast cancer diagnosis in 2002. In 2006- before I had a chance to complete and recover from the adjuvant Tamoxifen treatment, and consider starting a family- I had to undergo a total hysterectomy because of several large uterine fibroids, and ovarian cyst. I often felt that Tamoxifen caused these uterine growths. Now, as a nurse, I am annoyed at myself for not having investigated the possible effects of Tamoxifen, and even more annoyed at my oncologist, (who at every brief, annual check-up, he failed to question further my health as to possible abnormal gynaecologic-related symptoms- of which, looking back, I had many). Had I been made aware of these possible effects of Tamoxifen, and advised thus, I certainly would have undergone an annual gynae check-up which may had prevented the necessity for a total hysterectomy. Thoughts, anyone?

This article reviewed

Commentary (Kimmick/Muss): The Effect of Tamoxifen on the Endometrium

Commentary (Look): The Effect of Tamoxifen on the Endometrium






 
RELATED CONTENT

Endometrial Cancer at Young Age Ups Risk for Colorectal Cancer
April 22, 2013
Planning Treatment for Women With Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
ONCOLOGY,  April 15, 2013
Management of Recurrent EOC: The State of the Art
ONCOLOGY,  April 15, 2013
Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
ONCOLOGY,  April 15, 2013
AACR: Antibody-Drug Conjugate Shows Promise in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer
April 9, 2013
 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Primary Care Can't Thrive Without Nurse Practitioners
Courtney H. Lyder, ND,  May 17, 2013
With a projected shortfall of primary-care physicians, it's time for alternate solutions to patient care. Nurse practitioners are one logical remedy.
VWhat Physicians Can Learn from the Allscripts EHR Lawsuit
Marisa Torrieri,  May 16, 2013
Lawsuit prompts question: What should physicians do to ensure they end up with a great EHR instead of buyer’s remorse?
Eight Ways ICD-9 Will Still Matter to Medical Practices
Brenda Edwards, CPC,  May 15, 2013
What should your medical practice do with your ICD-9-CM book after October 1, 2014? Keep it.
Seven Ways Technology Can Speed Up Patient Collections
Cheyenne Brinson,  May 15, 2013
Failing to adopt widely available billing and collections technology can cost medical practices big. Here's how to do it right.
Four Reasons Private Medical Practice is Becoming Extinct
Carol Stryker,  May 15, 2013
It’s becoming increasingly difficult for private medical practices to thrive. Here’s what’s driving the trend toward consolidation.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Skin Lesions
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • New AUA Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Screening
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • Genomics Studies Identify Testicular Cancer Risk Variants
  • Lower Back Pain in an Elderly Man With a History of Localized Prostate Cancer
  • FDA Approves Erlotinib (Tarceva) as First-Line Lung Cancer Therapy for Certain Patients
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Financial Toxicity, Part II: How Can We Help With the Burden of Treatment-Related Costs?
  • Patient Quality of Life Endpoints in Oncology Trials, Part II
  • Who's Coding Whom?
  • “How Do I Say This Nicely? Your Oncologist Wasn't Following Guidelines”
  • Cancer Metabolism as a Therapeutic Target
  • Study: Cholesterol Drugs Reduced Risk of Prostate Cancer Death
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • ONS: Safe Handling of Chemotherapy
  • Financial Toxicity, Part II: How Can We Help With the Burden of Treatment-Related Costs?
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


 
SearchMedica Search Result

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on Gynecologic Cancer
Evidence on Gynecologic Cancer
Guidelines on Gynecologic Cancer
Patient Education on Gynecologic Cancer
Clinical Trials on Gynecologic Cancer
Practical Articles on Gynecologic Cancer
Research and Reviews on Gynecologic Cancer
All "Gynecologic Cancer" results


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy