CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » Hematologic Malignancies » Leukemia and Lymphoma

RESEARCH REPORT 

Targeting GFI1 May Improve Prognosis in ALL, Study Suggests

By Michael Kaufman | February 25, 2013

Findings of a newly published study by an international team of researchers suggest that targeting growth factor independence 1 (GFI1) may improve the prognosis of patients with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) or other lymphoid leukemias. Results were reported in the journal Cancer Cell.

Bone marrow smear (large magnification) from a patient with ALL; source: Furfur, Wikimedia Commons

Led by researchers at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC) and the Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montreal (ICRM), the study found that removing the GFI1 protein in mouse models of the disease weakened and killed the leukemia cells. If confirmed in clinical trials, the investigators said, this should make the leukemia more susceptible to chemo and radiation therapies—the current frontline treatments for ALL.

“Because oncogenic signaling activates a p53-dependent DNA damage response and apoptosis, leukemic cells must devise appropriate countermeasures,” they explained. They found that GFI1 can serve that function because GFI1 ablation exacerbates p53 responses and lowers the threshold for p53-induced cell death. “Specifically, GFI1 restricts p53 activity and expression of proapoptotic p53 targets such as Bax, Noxa (Pmaip1), and Puma (Bbc3).”

“GFI1 inhibition amplifies p53-dependent proapoptotic responses driven by oncogenic stress; consequently, transformed lymphoid tissues are uniquely susceptible to GFI1 inhibition,” explained H. Leighton Grimes, PhD, of the divisions of cellular and molecular immunology and experimental hematology at CCHMC. “In combination with current therapies, GFI1 inhibition may allow the use of lower cytotoxic doses, which would benefit patients directly.”

Grimes and Tarik Möröy, PhD, scientific director of the ICRM in Montreal, were co-senior investigators of the study, which included researchers from the United Kingdom, Germany, the United States, and Canada.

Despite the great promise shown by molecular-based targeted therapies, they have lacked broad applicability due to the heterogeneity of oncogenic pathways mutated during transformation, the authors explained. “Here, we demonstrate that ablation of GFI1 broadly leads to lymphoid tumor regression and host survival independent of the transforming pathway.”

GFI1 has an important role in the normal development of lymphoid cells. But analyses of ALL mouse models and primary human tumors showed that GFI1 is overexpressed in the disease state, according to the investigators. “Our results indicate that leukemic cells in general require GFI1 because the ablation of GFI1 led to lymphoid tumor regression and host survival independently of the transforming pathway or tumor etiology,” said the investigators, adding that GFI1 may be an “oncorequisite” factor—a  normal cellular protein upon which malignant cells uniquely depend for their survival. “This offers a different paradigm for cancer therapeutics and suggests that normal cellular proteins, independent of their mutation status in human tumors, can be excellent targets for clinical intervention.”

Further study is needed, however, to incisively define a role for GFI1 in human acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). The authors noted that HOXA9 signaling is present in mixed-lineage leukemia but is active in less than 10% of patients with T-ALL. “Patients with rare HOXA9-active T-ALL may not benefit from receiving GFI1-targeting therapies. Therefore, careful molecular pathology will likely be important to stratify patients for GFI1-targeted therapeutics.”

Nevertheless, they concluded, the main result from the study suggests that the goal of reducing chemotherapeutic or irradiation dose—and thus reducing their side effects while maintaining their efficacy—can be achieved by inhibiting the function of GFI1 in patients with T-ALL. “According to our data, leukemic cells lacking GFI1 will be more sensitive to DNA damage-inducing chemo- or irradiation therapy and undergo accelerated apoptosis. It is thus conceivable that targeting GFI1 will not only significantly improve response rates but may in particular allow lower effective doses of chemotherapeutic agents or irradiation.” The scientists are continuing their research to see if results of the current study will be translatable to human patients.

Funding for the research came in part from the National Institutes of Health, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Canada Research Chair program, Leukemia and Lymphoma Society of America, CancerFree Kids, Alex’s Lemonade Stand, the German Cancer Fund, the Cole Foundation, a University of Cincinnati Cancer Therapeutics T32 training grant, and a Pelotonia Fellowship.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
RELATED CONTENT

Intermittent Imatinib for Elderly CML Patients Shows Promise
June 14, 2013
Imatinib Discontinuation in Chronic Phase CML Doesn’t Always Lead to Relapse
June 14, 2013
Obesity Impairs Efficacy of L-Asparaginase in Leukemia Treatment
May 20, 2013
Radiotherapy Is NOT Essential to Cure Diffuse Large B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
ONCOLOGY,  May 15, 2013
Radiotherapy Is NOT Essential to Cure Diffuse Large B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
ONCOLOGY,  May 15, 2013
 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
   SEARCH MEDICA RX
   Browse drugs by name:
A B C D E F G H I J
K L M N O P Q R S T
U V W X Y Z All      
   Search for drugs:
Search

 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • Lower Back Pain in an Elderly Man With a History of Localized Prostate Cancer
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • Bladder Cancer Recurrence High, Better Follow-Up Care Needed
  • ASCO: Post-Surgery Surveillance Found Safe in Seminoma
  • Fertility Preservation in Women With Breast Cancer: Challenges and Opportunities
  • Addressing Fertility Concerns in Women Diagnosed With Breast Cancer: Will Serial Reserve Screening Help?
  • Postmenopausal Hormone Receptor–Positive Advanced Breast Cancer
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • ASCO: Vinegar Screening Significantly Reduces Cervical Cancer Mortality
  • ASCO: Sulforaphane in Prostate Cancer Found Worthy of Further Investigation
  • Study: Recurrent Heartburn Ups Risk for Throat Cancer
  • HER2-Directed Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation: The Current State of Our Knowledge
  • It’s Time for Clinicians to Reconsider Their Proscription Against the Use of Soyfoods by Breast Cancer Patients
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • ASCO: No Benefit From Avastin in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter



CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy