CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 
Home » Lung Cancer

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 19 No. 12
NEWS & ANALYSIS 

Future of Proton-Beam Radiation Therapy Shines Among Inoperable Lung Cancers

By Greg Freiherr | December 29, 2010

Research from Japan documenting remarkable survival rates among patients with inoperable lung cancer may only hint at the potential of proton-beam radiation therapy. The study out of the Proton Medical Research Center in Tennoudai, Japan, documented high survival rates for 55 patients suffering from stage I inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer.

Thirty-five patients with stage II-IIIb NSCLC were treated from November 2001 to July 2008 with different doses. Peripherally and centrally located tumors were irradiated with a median proton dose of 78.3 Gy.

The two-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate among the stage I patients was 88.7% and the local control rate was 97%, the authors, led by Hidetsugu Nakayama, MD, PhD, reported.

Local (PFS) for stage II-III patients was 93.3% at one year and 65.9% at two years during a median observation period of 16.9 months. Local recurrence took place in 11.4% of patients with 37.1% developing regional recurrence, and 20% developing distant metastases. The PFS for stage II-III patients was 59.6% at one year and 29.2% at two years. The overall survival rate of stage II-III patients was 81.8% at one year and 58.9% at two years. A total of 42.9% developed grade 1 toxicities and 17.1% developed grade 2 toxicities. There were no cases of grade 3 or greater toxicities, the authors said (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys online, September 30, 2010).

These rates contrast starkly with reported overall survival rates at five years for NSCLC patients treated with conventional radiotherapy, ranging from 6% to 31.4%. The difference may be due in part to the follow-up time differences in the available data: Two years for proton-beam radiation therapy and five for conventional therapy. But even for those treated with stereotactic radiosurgery, a highly precise form of radiation therapy, the survival rate is just is 54.7% after two years.
Reports of success with proton-beam therapy have seemed almost anecdotal because of the relatively few sites that offer this type of therapy. Much of the work has focused on cancers of the prostate and brain. But lately, with the rising number of proton-beam centers in the U.S. and around the world, other applications are being tried.

More research is needed to compare the relative effectiveness of proton-beam and stereotactic radiosurgery, the Japanese investigators said, just in regard to patients with stage I inoperable NSCLC. They urged a randomized clinical trial to clarify the survival benefit that might be achieved from using proton-beam radiation therapy.

VANTAGE POINT

Study results reflect inherent advantages of proton particles

Tim R. Williams, MD

The next five to 10 years will be an exciting time as proton-beam radiation therapy protocols come online for lung cancer, cancers of the esophagus and pancreas, liver tumors, and gynecological cancers, said Dr. Williams, chair of the ASTRO board of directors.

Dr. Williams explained that high-energy protons penetrate to a certain depth in the body, which is calculable and controllable, and then they stop. "For this reason, there’s always been interest in using them for localized tumors," said Dr. Williams, medical director of radiation oncology at Boca Raton Community Hospital in Florida.

Advances in computers have made proton targeting more precise. So has technology that controls the proton beam, turning it on and off to match the rhythm of a patient’s respiration.

"[Using it on] small lung tumors is a perfect application because you can exactly target the tumor and control for respiratory motion, eliminating the tumors without the need for surgery," he said. "So the results (obtained in Japan) are very exciting. They are a natural reflection of the inherent potential advantages of the particles themselves."

Proton-beam radiation therapy typically focuses on localized tumors because protons are best applied when the tumors are highly defined. "If you have regional spread, then local control obviously is not as relevant," Dr. Williams said. "This increasing number of proton-beam therapy facilities allows us to explore new levels of dose intensity and capitalize on increased local control using particle therapy."

 

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
RELATED CONTENT

FDA Approves Erlotinib (Tarceva) as First-Line Lung Cancer Therapy for Certain Patients
May 16, 2013
New Targets and New Mechanisms in Lung Cancer
ONCOLOGY,  May 15, 2013
A 49-Year-Old Woman Develops Thickened and Bound-Down Skin
May 13, 2013
In NSCLC, Beta-3 Tubulin Isoform Does Not Predict Treatment Response to Ixabepilone, Paclitaxel
May 13, 2013
HER2-Targeted Therapies Could Benefit Lung Cancer Patients With HER2 Mutations
May 1, 2013
 
CANCER MANAGEMENT

Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
   • Screening and prevention
   • Signs and symptoms
   • Staging and prognosis
   • Treatment
Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Mesothelioma
Thymoma
 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
   SEARCH MEDICA RX
   Browse drugs by name:
A B C D E F G H I J
K L M N O P Q R S T
U V W X Y Z All      
   Search for drugs:
Search

 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Primary Care Can't Thrive Without Nurse Practitioners
Courtney H. Lyder, ND,  May 17, 2013
With a projected shortfall of primary-care physicians, it's time for alternate solutions to patient care. Nurse practitioners are one logical remedy.
VWhat Physicians Can Learn from the Allscripts EHR Lawsuit
Marisa Torrieri,  May 16, 2013
Lawsuit prompts question: What should physicians do to ensure they end up with a great EHR instead of buyer’s remorse?
Eight Ways ICD-9 Will Still Matter to Medical Practices
Brenda Edwards, CPC,  May 15, 2013
What should your medical practice do with your ICD-9-CM book after October 1, 2014? Keep it.
Seven Ways Technology Can Speed Up Patient Collections
Cheyenne Brinson,  May 15, 2013
Failing to adopt widely available billing and collections technology can cost medical practices big. Here's how to do it right.
Four Reasons Private Medical Practice is Becoming Extinct
Carol Stryker,  May 15, 2013
It’s becoming increasingly difficult for private medical practices to thrive. Here’s what’s driving the trend toward consolidation.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Skin Lesions
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • New AUA Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Screening
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • Genomics Studies Identify Testicular Cancer Risk Variants
  • Lower Back Pain in an Elderly Man With a History of Localized Prostate Cancer
  • FDA Approves Erlotinib (Tarceva) as First-Line Lung Cancer Therapy for Certain Patients
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Financial Toxicity, Part II: How Can We Help With the Burden of Treatment-Related Costs?
  • Patient Quality of Life Endpoints in Oncology Trials, Part II
  • Who's Coding Whom?
  • “How Do I Say This Nicely? Your Oncologist Wasn't Following Guidelines”
  • Study: Cholesterol Drugs Reduced Risk of Prostate Cancer Death
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • ONS: Safe Handling of Chemotherapy
  • Financial Toxicity, Part II: How Can We Help With the Burden of Treatment-Related Costs?
  • Conflicts of Interest in Medicine: What About Ties to Payers?
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter

 
SearchMedica Search Result

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on Lung Cancer
Evidence on Lung Cancer
Guidelines on Lung Cancer
Patient Education on Lung Cancer
Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer
Practical Articles on Lung Cancer
Research and Reviews on Lung Cancer
All "Lung Cancer" results

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy