|
|
REVIEW ARTICLE
Bradford S. Hoppe, et al; ONCOLOGY Vol. 26 No. 5
This review addresses the rationale and evidence for—and the challenges, cost implications, and future development of—proton therapy as an important part of the treatment strategy in Hodgkin lymphoma.
• Protons: Moving Therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma in a Positive Direction
• Proton Radiotherapy: The Good, the Bad, and the Uncertain
REVIEW ARTICLE
Catherine Thieblemont et al; ONCOLOGY Vol. 26 No. 2
In this article, we review the current knowledge on the biological findings, clinical features, and therapeutic approaches for splenic marginal zone lymphoma.
• Splenic Lymphomas: Is There Still a Role for Splenectomy?
• Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma: Villous, Not Necessarily Villainous
REVIEW ARTICLE
Alexandra Traverse-Glehen, et al; ONCOLOGY Vol. 26 No. 1
This review summarizes descriptions of the clinical presentation provided in published series and discusses diagnostic difficulties faced by hematopathologists when dealing with these lesions.
• Nodal Marginal Zone Lymphoma: Impersonalized Medicine
• Nodal Marginal Zone Lymphoma: What Do We Really Know?
Diffuse Large B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in the Very Elderly: Challenges and Solutions
Shadi Latta, MD1,
Peter H. Cygan, MD1,
Walter Fried, MD1,
Chadi Nabhan, MD, FACP1
, February 15, 2013
In this review, we critically analyze clinical trials that were specifically designed for the very elderly, and we discuss the challenges encountered by investigators who are conducting studies in this patient population. We conclude by proposing an algorithm to help clinicians determine the optimal therapeutic strategy for treatment of DLBCL in very elderly patients.
• When Can R-CHOP Not Be Used in an Elderly Patient?
• The Case for Refining Our Clinical Trials
• DLBCL in the Elderly: Leaving Our Old Way(s) Behind?
Combined-Modality Therapy for Early-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma: Maintaining High Cure Rates While Minimizing Risks
Chris R. Kelsey, MD1, Anne W. Beaven, MD2, Louis F. Diehl, MD2, Leonard R. Prosnitz, MD1
, December 17, 2012
In Hodgkin lymphoma, as with many other malignancies, a combined-modality approach has proven successful. This tactic capitalizes on the relative advantages of both modalities, yet minimizes risk by avoiding intense exposure to either. This article will summarize the data supporting this approach in early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma.
• The Important Role of Secondary Treatment in Hodgkin Lymphoma
• Treatment for Favorable Localized Hodgkin Lymphoma
Improving the Therapeutic Ratio in Hodgkin Lymphoma Through the Use of Proton Therapy
Bradford S. Hoppe, MD, MPH1,
Stella Flampouri, PhD1,
James Lynch, MD2,
William Slayton, MD3,
Robert Zaiden, MD4,
Zuofeng Li, DSc1,
Nancy P. Mendenhall, MD1
, May 15, 2012
This review addresses the rationale and evidence for—and the challenges, cost implications, and future development of—proton therapy as an important part of the treatment strategy in Hodgkin lymphoma.
• Protons: Moving Therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma in a Positive Direction
• Proton Radiotherapy: The Good, the Bad, and the Uncertain
Oncology NEWS Today Blog.
No. 9
Focus on Hematology
Follicular lymphoma vaccine finally makes good with prolonged disease-free survival
By Alice Goodman |
September 22, 2009
Complete remission appears to be a prerequisite for achieving a benefit from the BiovaxID, according to phase II study results.
 After almost a decade of research and two trials of a follicular lymphoma vaccine with negative results, a study of a personalized idiotype vaccine has achieved positive results. BiovaxID prolonged median disease-free survival by more than a year in a subset of patients who maintained complete remission after one year of chemotherapy and then received the vaccine. "With this vaccine, we've moved into an era where we can safely use a patient's immune system to fight follicular lymphoma effectively and enhance response to conventional chemotherapy," said Stephen J. Schuster, MD, associate professor at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, who presented results of the eight-year-long randomized, double-blind, phase II study at ASCO 2009. Patients treated with the patient-specific vaccine had a median of 14 months longer disease-free survival than with those who received a control vaccine (KLH vaccine). BiovaxID is made from tumor-derived idiotype proteins, unique to each lymphoma tumor, that were isolated from individual patient samples and linked to the hemocyanin protein from the keyhole limpet (KLH). BiovaxID is given simultaneously with GM-CSF growth factor support, and patients who got the control KLH vaccine also got GM-CSF. BiovaxID is being developed by BioVest International. BiovaxID is designed to recruit the patient's immune system to find and destroy tumor B cells selectively, and this approach may prove useful for other B-cell lymphomas, Dr. Schuster explained during a press conference. The NCI-funded study enrolled 234 chemotherapy-naive patients with stage III/IV or bulky stage II follicular lymphoma. All patients were treated with PACE chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin(Drug information on doxorubicin), etoposide(Drug information on etoposide), and prednisone(Drug information on prednisone)), a regimen not commonly used to treat follicular lymphoma. Patients who achieved complete remission for at least six months (n = 117) were randomized to receive BiovaxID or a conventional KLH control vaccine (abstract 2). One hundred seventy-seven patients received at least one dose of vaccine, but 60 of them relapsed. In a modified intent-to-treat analysis that included only the 117 patients vaccinated in remission, disease-free survival was 44.2 months with BiovaxID vs 30.6 months with the control vaccine, representing a 38% risk reduction (P = .045 log rank test). The vaccine was well tolerated, with no difference between treatment arms in the frequency and nature of grade 3 and 4 adverse events. Local injection site reactions were similar in both groups. "Complete remission appears to be a prerequisite for achieving a benefit from the BiovaxID," Dr. Schuster said. The study was initiated using chemotherapy that was standard of care eight years ago. Chemotherapy with rituximab(Drug information on rituximab) (Rituxan) is the current standard of care. The vaccine induces cellular immunity and therefore has a mechanism of action different from that of other immunotherapies. Theoretically it could be combined with chemotherapy and other immunotherapies. "We will study use of the vaccine after achieving complete remission on rituximab combination chemotherapy regimens," Dr. Schuster stated.
|
|
Cancer Types
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supportive Care
|
More Topics
|
|
|
|
All Topics 
Hematology Letters is a new blog for Cancer Network written by Mojtaba Akhtari, MD of the University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
SEARCHMEDICA SEARCH RESULTS
Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals
|
|