CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » Melanoma

ONCOLOGY. Vol. 19 No. 9
Pages: 1  2  
Previous
REVIEW ARTICLE 

Mohs Micrographic Surgery: Established Uses and Emerging Trends

By Brent E. Pennington, MD1, David J. Leffell, MD | August 1, 2005
1Fellow, Department of Dermatology 2Professor of Dermatology, Departments of Dermatology and Surgery (Plastic Surgery and Otolaryngology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut

Merkel Cell Carcinoma

Merkel cell carcinoma is an aggressive neoplasm of the skin that was originally described by Toker in 1972 as trabecular cell carcinoma.[18] It is believed to be derived from the Merkel cell, which is a cell of neuroendocrine origin located in the basal layer of the epidermis involved in mediating the sensation of pressure. Merkel cell carcinoma is a rare neoplasm with an estimated annual incidence of 0.23 per 100,000 in Caucasians. It is primarily a tumor of older individuals, with an average age at presentation of 69 years and less than 5% of tumors occurring in patients younger than age 50. There is a slightly increased ratio of tumors in males compared to females (2.3:1).[19]

Merkel cell carcinoma typically presents as an erythematous-to-violaceous subcutaneous nodule or plaque. The overlying skin usually remains intact but may exhibit central ulceration. It occurs predominantly in sun-exposed areas of skin, with 50% of tumors arising on the head and neck and 40% on the extremities.[19] It is almost exclusively a disease of fair-skinned individuals. This, in combination with its usual anatomic presentation, has led investigators to presume that ultraviolet radiation is a primary factor in its etiology. Similar to SCC, Merkel cell carcinoma also appears to occur with increased frequency in patients who have undergone solid organ transplantation and those with other forms of immunosuppression.

Merkel cell carcinoma exhibits an aggressive biologic behavior with the potential for rapid spread through either lymphatic or hematogenous routes. Approximately 30% of patients have regional nodal mestastases at the time of presentation. Reported 5-year survival rates range from 30% to 81%. Due to the rarity of this tumor, no prospective randomized trials exist to guide surgical management. Currently, the most common approach to the patient with stage I disease (ie, tumor clinically localized to the skin) is wide local excision of the primary tumor with 2- to 3-cm margins of clinically uninvolved skin, with or without adjuvant radiation. Studies employing this approach have produced local recurrence rates ranging from 13% to 39%.[20,21] Complete resection of the primary tumor is of paramount importance, as two-thirds of those who develop local recurrences ultimately die of their disease.[21]

With complete examination of the surgical margin, Mohs surgery was recognized as a possible alternative to wide local excision for optimizing resection of the primary tumor and minimizing local recurrence. The first series of patients with Merkel cell carcinoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery was reported in 1997 by O'Connor et al.[22] This retrospective study analyzed rates of local recurrence and regional metastasis in patients treated with either Mohs surgery (n = 12) or wide local excision (n = 41). Local recurrence was identified in 8.3% of patients treated with Mohs surgery vs 31.7% of those with wide local excision. Regional metastases developed in one-third of the Mohs surgery group and 48.8% of the wide local excision group.

Boyer et al reviewed 45 cases of Merkel cell carcinoma treated with Mohs surgery; 20 of the patients in this series also received adjuvant radiation therapy.[23] A local recurrence, which the authors defined to include both marginal recurrence and in-transit metastases, was observed in 8.8% of patients-16% of those treated with Mohs alone but none of those treated with Mohs surgery plus radiation therapy. The overall 5-year survival estimate for both groups was 79% and 80%, respectively.

Thus, initial results of the treat treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma with Mohs surgery appear to demonstrate local recurrence and survival rates comparable to or better than those of wide local excision. That said, the experience with Mohs surgery in the management of Merkel cell carcinoma remains limited.

Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans is an uncommon mesenchymal neoplasm that originates in the dermis. The tumor is characterized by a locally aggressive growth pattern in which ramifications of spindle cells infiltrate the dermis and surrounding tissues. With time, involvement of the subcutaneous fat, muscle, cartilage, and bone may occur.[24] The potential for hematogenous or lymphatic dissemination does exist but is rare. Clinically, the tumor typically presents as an erythematous-to-violaceous nodule or plaque with poorly circumscribed clinical margins. It occurs primarily on the trunk and proximal extremities of individuals in their 30s and 40s.

With reported local recurrence rates of 30% to 50% for simple excision and 20% for wide local excision,[ 24] Mohs surgery has emerged as the treatment of choice for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. In a series of 29 cases with more than 5 years of follow-up, Snow et al experienced no recurrences in primary and recurrent tumors treated with Mohs surgery.[25] Their review of 136 cases in the literature with similar follow-up documented 9 cases of recurrence, for a local recurrence rate of 6.6%. In a study of 22 patients with dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans treated with a modified Mohs technique utilizing rush paraffin(Drug information on paraffin) sections, no recurrences were observed.[26]

Despite the absence of randomized controlled trials, Mohs surgery appears to offer lower recurrence rates than conventional surgical excision for the treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Experience in the treatment of other spindled cell tumors of the skin with Mohs surgery is more limited. However, Heuther et al reported local recurrence rates of 6.9% for atypical fibroxanthoma, 43% for malignant fibrous histiocytoma, and 14% for leiomyosarcoma.[27] The role of Mohs surgery in the management of these other spindled neoplasms remains unclear and will become better defined with increased experience.

Extramammary Paget's Disease

Extramammary Paget's disease is a rare cutaneous adenocarcinoma believed to be derived from apocrine cells. Cases primarily occur in regions of high apocrine gland distribution, namely the vulva, penis, scrotum, perianal region, and less frequently, the axilla. The precise histogenesis of this tumor is unknown, but 10% to 20% of cases have been observed in association with an internal malignancy, usually of the gastrointestinal or genitourinary system.[28,29]

Extramammary Paget's disease typically presents as an erythematous macerated patch of the anogenital region. A delay in diagnosis of 5 to 10 years is not uncommon, as the clinical presentation may be mistaken for other dermatoses such as tinea cruris, erythrasma, inverse psoriasis, or contact dermatitis.[30] The growth of this neoplasm is usually intraepidermal in nature with involvement of adjacent adnexal structures; however, dermal invasive disease with subsequent regional and systemic metastases does occur in up to 10% of cases.[29] The prognosis is poor once dissemination has begun.

Surgical management of the primary tumor of extramammary Paget's disease is confounded by the neoplasm's indistinct clinical margins and propensity for extensive subclinical spread. The literature reports local recurrence rates of 33% to 60% for standard surgical excision with frozen and/or fixed margin control.[30-34] In addition, for cases treated with wide local excision, reported local recurrence rates remain high at 20% to 50%.[31-34]

These high local recurrence rates, in addition to the known tendency of extramammary Paget's disease for broad subclinical extension, prompted several investigators to examine the use of Mohs surgery as an alternative treatment. The largest reported series of extramammary Paget's disease treated with Mohs surgery consisted of 27 cases (19 primary tumors, 8 recurrent tumors) with an average follow-up of 76 months.[35] Their results revealed a local recurrence rate of 16% for primary extramammary Paget's disease and 50% for recurrent tumors (23% local recurrence rate for combined primary and recurrent tumors). Similar results, with a local recurrence rate of 23%, were reported by Coldiron et al in a survey of 48 cases of primary and recurrent extramammary Paget's disease treated with Mohs surgery.[30]

In a retrospective review, O'Connor et al examined local recurrence rates in 83 patients treated with wide local excision as compared to 12 patients treated with Mohs micrographic surgery.[ 29] Locally recurrent disease was observed in 22% of the wide local excision group and 8% of the Mohs surgery group; however, it should be noted that the two groups had significantly different mean follow-up periods (65 vs 24 months).

Although the existing data regarding the use of Mohs surgery in the treatment of extramammary Paget's disease are limited, such results appear favorable in comparison with those of wide local excision. Regardless of whether Mohs surgery or wide local excision is utilized, several adjunct techniques have been identified to optimize complete surgical excision of extramammary Paget's disease. Identification of subclinical spread of tumor may be aided by the use of peripheral scouting biopsies, topical imiquimod(Drug information on imiquimod) (Aldara) or fluorouracil(Drug information on fluorouracil) cream,[36] and photodynamic therapy.[29] Histopathologic identification of residual tumor is aided by the use of immunohistochemical staining with cytokeratin-7[37] and carcinoembryonic antigen.[38]

Microcystic Adnexal Carcinoma

Microcystic adnexal carcinoma is a locally aggressive neoplasm that was first described in 1982.[39] Although the tumor does not appear to have the potential for metastasis, it is characterized by extensive subclinical spread of the malignancy beyond the identifiable tumor margins. Perineural invasion of tumor is not uncommon in the dermis, and invasion of deeper local structures such as the subcutaneous fat, muscle, and cartilage has been reported.[40]

FIGURE 6
Microcystic Adnexal Carcinoma Microcystic Adnexal Carcinoma

Microcystic adnexal carcinoma typically presents as a slightly indurated, flesh-colored plaque of the face (Figure 6). It occurs primarily in whites, but a single case has been reported in an African-American male.[41] There appears to be a modestly increased incidence in females over males. It has been observed in all age groups, but highest incidence has occurred in patients in their 7th decade.[42] There is often a prior history of x-ray irradiation of the site for the treatment of acne.[43]

Given the indistinct nature of the clinical borders of microcystic adnexal carcinoma, Mohs surgery would appear ideal for surgical management of the tumor. Recurrence rates with conventional surgical excision have been estimated at 47%, based on review of the literature.[43] In a series of 11 cases of microcystic adnexal carcinoma treated with Mohs surgery, Friedman et al observed no recurrences over a mean follow-up of 5 years.[43] In a review of the Australian experience of the treatment of microcystic adnexal carcinoma with Mohs surgery, Lebovitch at al reported a 5% recurrence rate in the 20 patients with at least 5 years follow-up.[44] The largest available series of patients with microcystic adnexal carcinoma treated with either Mohs surgery or traditional excision found a local recurrence rate of 12% for the Mohs group and 17% for the excision group.[42] In addition, 30% of the group treated with standard excision required multiple additional procedures due to persistence of disease after initial excision.

The available data on the optimal therapy for microcystic adnexal carcinoma is sparse, and no prospective randomized controls exist due to the rarity of this tumor. Mohs micrographic surgery does appear to offer an advantage over traditional excision in the treatment of this locally aggressive neoplasm. The major challenge in the management of microcystic adnexal carcinoma with Mohs surgery is the accurate histopathologic interpretation of frozen sections of this tumor. This task is highly dependent upon both the quality of the sections produced by the histotechnician and the experience of the Mohs surgeon. Adjunctive measures to increase the sensitivity of this process include the use of immunohistochemical staining[45] and a modified Mohs technique in which rush paraffin sections are used.

Conclusions

Fundamentally, Mohs micrographic surgery differs from conventional surgical excision by its ability to provide complete histologic examination of surgical margins. This technique allows the Mohs surgeon to maximize normal tissue conservation through narrower surgical margins while achieving the highest cure rates for the treatment of the most common cutaneous neoplasms.

Mohs surgery has been wellestablished as the gold standard for the treatment of BCCs and SCCs.[1-3] Preliminary reports suggest that it may play an equally important role in the management of several other cutaneous malignancies, as described above. Further experience will better define this role and provide additional insight into other uses.

Financial Disclosure: The authors have no significant financial interest or other relationship with the manufacturers of any products or providers of any service mentioned in this article.

Pages: 1  2  
Previous
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.



VICTOR A. NEEL, MD, PhD and ARTHUR J. SOBER, MD
MARC D. BROWN, MD


1. Rowe DE, Carroll RJ, Day CL: Long-term recurrence rates in previously untreated basal cell carcinoma: Implications for patient follow-up. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 15:315-328, 1989.
2. Rowe DE, Carroll RJ, Day CL: Mohs surgery is the treatment of choice for recurrent (previously treated) basal cell carcinoma. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 15:424-431, 1989.
3. Rowe DE, Carroll RJ, Day CL: Prognostic factors for local recurrence, metastasis, and survival rates in squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, ear, and lip. Implications for treatment modality selection. J Am Acad Dermatol 26:976- 990, 1992.
4. Abide JA, Nahai F, Bennett RG: The meaning of surgical margins. Plast Reconstr Surg 73:492-497, 1984.
5. Brodland DG, Amonette R, Hanke CW, et al: The history and evolution of Mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol Surg 26:303-307, 2000.
6. Tromovitch TA, Stegman SJ: Microscopically controlled excision of skin tumors. Arch Dermatol 110:231-232, 1974.
7. Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, et al: Cancer statistics, 2005. Ca Cancer J Clin 55:10-30, 2005.
8. Balch CM, Buzaid AC, Soong SJ, et al: Final version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System for cutaneous melanoma. J Clin Oncol 19:3635-3648, 2001.
9. Sober AJ, Chuang TY, Duvic M, et al: Guidelines of care for primary cutaneous melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 45:578-586, 2001.
10. Mohs FE: Chemosurgical treatment of melanoma: A microscopically controlled method of excision. Arch Dermatol Syph 62:269-272, 1950.
11. Bienert TN, Trotter MJ, Arlette JP: Treatment of cutaneous melanoma of the face by Mohs micrographic surgery. J Cutan Med Surg 7:25- 30, 2003.
12. Zitelli JA, Mohs FE, Larson P, et al: Mohs micrographic surgery for melanoma. Dermatol Clin 7:833-843, 1989.
13. Bricca GM, Brodland DG, Ren D, et al: Cutaneous head and neck melanoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol 52:92-100, 2005.
14. Barlow RJ, White CR, Swanson NA: Mohs’ micrographic surgery using frozen sections alone may be unsuitable for detecting single atypical melanocytes at the margins of melanoma in situ. Br J Dermatol 146:290-294, 2002.
15. Zitelli, JA, Moy RL, Abell EA: The reliability of frozen sections for the evaluation surgical margins of melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 24:102-106, 1991.
16. Bricca GM, Brodland DG, Zitelli JA: Immunostaining melanoma frozen sections: The 1 hour protocol. Derm Surg 30:403-408, 2004.
17. Kelley LC, Starkus L: Immunohistochemical staining of lentigo maligna during Mohs micrographic surgery using MART-1. J Am Acad Dermatol 46:78-84, 2002.
18. Toker C: Trabecular carcinoma of the skin. Arch Dermatol 105:107-110, 1972.
19. Miller RW, Rabkin CS: Merkel cell carcinoma and melanoma: Etiological similarities and differences. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8:153-158, 1999.
20. Yiengpruksawan A, Coit DG, Thaler HT, et al: Merkel cell carcinoma. Prognosis and management. Arch Surg 126:1514-1519, 1991.
21. Shaw JH, Rumball E: Merkel cell tumour: Clinical behaviour and treatment. Br J Surg 78:138-142, 1991.
22. O’Connor WJ, Roenigk RK, Brodland DG: Merkel cell carcinoma: Comparison of Mohs micrographic surgery and wide excision in 86 patients. Dermatol Surg 23:929-933, 1997.
23. Boyer JD, Zitelli JA, Brodland DG, et al: Local control of primary Merkel cell carcinoma: Review of 45 cases treated with Mohs micrographic surgery with and without adjuvant radiation. J Am Acad Dermatol 47:885-892, 2002.
24. Gloster HM, Harris KR, Roenigk RK: A comparison between Mohs micrographic surgery and wide surgical excision for the treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. J Am Acad Dermatol 35:82-87, 1996.
25. Snow SN, Gordon EM, Larson PO, et al: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: A report on 29 patients treated by Mohs micrographic surgery with long-term follow-up and review of the literature. Cancer 101:28-38, 2004.
26. Wacker J, Khan-Durani B, Hartschuh W: Modified Mohs micrographic surgery in the therapy of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: Analysis of 22 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 11:438- 444, 2004.
27. Huether MJ, Zitelli JA, Brodland DG: Mohs micrographic surgery for the treatment of spindle cell tumors of the skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 44:656-659, 2001.
28. Chanda JJ: Extramammary Paget’s disease: Prognosis and relationship to internal malignancy. J Am Acad Dermatol 13:1009-1014, 1985.
29. O’Connor WJ, Lim KK, Zalla MJ, et al: Comparison of Mohs micrographic surgery and wide excision for extramammary Paget’s disease. Dermatol Surg 29:723-727, 2003.
30. Coldiron BM, Goldsmith BA, Robinson JK: Surgical treatment of extramammary Paget’s disease: A report of six cases and a reexamination of Mohs micrographic surgery compared with conventional surgical excision. Cancer 67:933-938, 1991.
31. Marchesa P, Fazio VW, Oliart S, et al: Long-term outcome of patients with perianal Paget’s disease. Ann Surg Oncol 4:475-480, 1997.
32. Zollo JD, Zeitouni NC: The Roswell Park Cancer Institute experience with extramammary Paget’s disease. Br J Dermatol 142:59-65, 2000.
33. McCarter MD, Quan SH, Busam K, et al: Long-term outcome of perianal Paget’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 46:612-616, 2003.
34. Sarmiento JM, Wolff BG, Burgart LJ, et al: Paget’s disease of the perianal region: An aggressive disease? Dis Colon Rectum 40:1187- 1194, 1997.
35. Hendi A, Brodland DG, Zitelli JA: Extramammary Paget’s disease: Surgical treatment with Mohs micrographic surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol 51:767-773, 2004.
36. Eliezri YD, Silvers DN, Horan DB: Role of preoperative topical 5-flourouracil in preparation for Mohs micrographic surgery of extramammary Paget’s disease. J Am Acad Dermatol 17:497-505, 1987.
37. Smith KJ, Tuur S, Corvette D, et al: Cytokeratin 7 staining in mammary and extramammary Paget’s disease. Mod Pathol 10:1069-1074, 1997.
38. Harris DW, Kist DA, Bloom K, et al: Rapid staining with carcinoembryonic antigen aids limited excision of extramammary Paget’s disease treated by Mohs surgery. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 20:260-264, 1994.
39. Goldstein DJ, Barr RJ, Cruz DJ: Microcystic adnexal carcinoma: A distinct clinicopathologic entity. Cancer 50:566-572, 1982.
40. Birkby CS, Argenyl ZB, Whitaker DC: Microcystic adnexal carcinoma with mandibular invasion and bone marrow replacement. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 15:308-312, 1989.
41. Park JY, Parry EL: Microcystic adnexal carcinoma: First reported case in a black patient. Dermatol Surg 24:905-907, 1998.
42. Chiller K, Passaro D, Scheuller M, et al: Microcystic adnexal carcinoma: Forty-eight cases, their treatment and their outcome. Arch Dermatol 136:1355-1359, 2000.
43. Friedman PM, Friedman RH, Jiang B, et al: Microcystic adnexal carcinoma: Collabora- tive series review and update. J Am Acad Dermatol 41:225-231, 1999.
44. Lebovitch I, Huilgol, Selva D: Microcystic adnexal carcinoma: Treatment with Mohs micrographic surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol 52:295- 300, 2005.
45. Wick MR, Cooper PH, Swanson PE, et al: Microcystic adnexal carcinoma: An immunohistochemical comparison with other cutaneous appendage tumors. Arch Dermatol 126:189-194, 1990.


 
RELATED CONTENT

The Past, Present, and Future of Melanoma Therapy
ONCOLOGY,  May 15, 2013
Treatment for Advanced Melanoma: New Drugs, New Opportunities, New Challenges
ONCOLOGY,  May 15, 2013
Advances in the Systemic Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma
ONCOLOGY,  May 15, 2013
Leukocoria (White Pupil) in 3-Year-Old Patient
April 1, 2013
Subcutaneous Nodule Excised From 38-Year-Old Patient
March 25, 2013
 
SLIDE SHOWS

ABCDEs of Moles and Melanoma

Slide Show: ABCDEs of Melanoma

Skin Lesions

Slide Show: Skin Lesions

 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
   SEARCH MEDICA RX
   Browse drugs by name:
A B C D E F G H I J
K L M N O P Q R S T
U V W X Y Z All      
   Search for drugs:
Search

 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Primary Care Can't Thrive Without Nurse Practitioners
Courtney H. Lyder, ND,  May 17, 2013
With a projected shortfall of primary-care physicians, it's time for alternate solutions to patient care. Nurse practitioners are one logical remedy.
VWhat Physicians Can Learn from the Allscripts EHR Lawsuit
Marisa Torrieri,  May 16, 2013
Lawsuit prompts question: What should physicians do to ensure they end up with a great EHR instead of buyer’s remorse?
Eight Ways ICD-9 Will Still Matter to Medical Practices
Brenda Edwards, CPC,  May 15, 2013
What should your medical practice do with your ICD-9-CM book after October 1, 2014? Keep it.
Seven Ways Technology Can Speed Up Patient Collections
Cheyenne Brinson,  May 15, 2013
Failing to adopt widely available billing and collections technology can cost medical practices big. Here's how to do it right.
Four Reasons Private Medical Practice is Becoming Extinct
Carol Stryker,  May 15, 2013
It’s becoming increasingly difficult for private medical practices to thrive. Here’s what’s driving the trend toward consolidation.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • Skin Lesions
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • Palliative Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Bone Metastases Improves Quality of Life
  • Staying Fit Could Ward Off Lung and Colorectal Cancer for Middle-Age Men
  • Obesity Impairs Efficacy of L-Asparaginase in Leukemia Treatment
  • New AUA Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Screening
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Financial Toxicity, Part II: How Can We Help With the Burden of Treatment-Related Costs?
  • Patient Quality of Life Endpoints in Oncology Trials, Part II
  • Who's Coding Whom?
  • “How Do I Say This Nicely? Your Oncologist Wasn't Following Guidelines”
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • Cancer Metabolism as a Therapeutic Target
  • Study: Cholesterol Drugs Reduced Risk of Prostate Cancer Death
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • ONS: Safe Handling of Chemotherapy
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


 
SearchMedica Search Result

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on Melanoma Skin Cancer
Evidence on Melanoma Skin Cancer
Guidelines on Melanoma Skin Cancer
Patient Education on Melanoma Skin Cancer
Clinical Trials on Melanoma Skin Cancer
Practical Articles on Melanoma Skin Cancer
Research and Reviews on Melanoma Skin Cancer
All "Melanoma Skin Cancer" results


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy