CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 6 No. 11
 

Adriamycin Bests Taxol as Therapy for Advanced Breast Cancer

November 1, 1997

HAMBURG—In previously un-treated women with advanced breast cancer, doxorubicin(Drug information on doxorubicin) (Adriamycin) yields a higher response rate and longer progression-free survival than does paclitaxel(Drug information on paclitaxel) (Taxol), according to the results of a randomized crossover trial conducted by the EORTC and presented at the Ninth European Cancer Conference (ECCO 9).

“Doxorubicin as first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer followed by paclitaxel should be preferred to the reverse sequence,” said Study Coordinator R. Paridaens of the University of Leuven (Belgium).

However, Dr. Paridaens warned, “the increased antitumor activity of doxorubicin is achieved at the expense of greater hematologic, gastrointestinal, and cardiac toxicity.”

The EORTC investigators randomized 331 chemotherapy-naïve patients to receive either paclitaxel, 200 mg/m2 over 3 hours every 3 weeks, or doxorubicin, 75 mg/m2, over 5 to 15 minutes every 3 weeks to a maximum cumulative dose of 525 mg/m2.

Crossover to the alternative regimen for second-line treatment was mandatory for women who exhibited progressive disease during the first seven courses and was optional for women who later showed progressive disease.

Significant Difference in Response

“We had a significant difference in the objective response rate to first-line treatment—25% with paclitaxel and 41% with doxorubicin,” Dr. Paridaens reported.

The curves for progression-free survival showed a major and significant advantage in favor of the doxorubicin group, he said. Median progression-free survival was 7.6 months for women who received first-line doxorubicin therapy, compared with 4.1 months for their paclitaxel-treated counterparts.

Among women who were resistant to doxorubicin and crossed over to second-line paclitaxel, the tax-ane produced a partial response rate of 13% and was associated with progressive disease in 46% of cases.

In contrast, Dr. Paridaens noted, partial responses were observed in 30% of paclitaxel-resistant patients who were crossed over to doxorubicin, and progressive disease was seen in only 16% of this group. “There is no cross-resistance between the two drugs, whatever the sequence of administration,” he said.

For overall survival, first-line doxorubicin was always superior, although the P-value did not reach significance, Dr. Paridaens said. The duration of survival was 18.4 months for patients starting with doxorubicin, compared with 15.2 months for those who initially received paclitaxel.

Adverse Effects

Doxorubicin was linked with a higher incidence of vomiting (13% vs 2% with paclitaxel), stomatitis (15% vs 1%), and cardiotoxicity (5% vs 1%), and with a slightly though not significantly higher rate of documented infections. Neurotoxicity, on the other hand, was more common during taxane treatment (9% versus 0%).

Quality of life, as assessed by the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist and the EORTC QLQ-C30, did not differ significantly between the two treatment arms. After three cycles of doxorubicin treatment, patients were experiencing more side effects but reporting less bone pain and better overall pain control.

A particularly interesting finding in this study, Dr. Paridaens said, was that baseline global quality of life was a good predictor of later survival.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • Lower Back Pain in an Elderly Man With a History of Localized Prostate Cancer
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • Bladder Cancer Recurrence High, Better Follow-Up Care Needed
  • ASCO: Post-Surgery Surveillance Found Safe in Seminoma
  • Fertility Preservation in Women With Breast Cancer: Challenges and Opportunities
  • Addressing Fertility Concerns in Women Diagnosed With Breast Cancer: Will Serial Reserve Screening Help?
  • Postmenopausal Hormone Receptor–Positive Advanced Breast Cancer
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy