CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 7 No. 11
 

Gemzar Gets Indication for First-Line Treatment of NSCLC

November 1, 1998

INDIANAPOLIS--Eli Lilly and Company’s Gemzar (gemcitabine) has received FDA approval for use as first-line treatment of inoperable, locally advanced, or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in combination with cisplatin(Drug information on cisplatin) (Platinol). The agent was previously approved as first-line, single-agent therapy of locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

"When left untreated, advanced lung cancer can take the lives of patients within 4 months," said Alan Sandler, MD, assistant professor of medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, and lead investigator for the pivotal trial. "Our study showed that 39% of patients who received Gemzar plus cisplatin were still alive after 1 year, compared with only 28% of patients who received cisplatin alone."

Two randomized, multicenter trials supported gemcitabine(Drug information on gemcitabine)’s supplemental new drug application for NSCLC. The pivotal phase III trial included 522 patients who had received no previous chemotherapy; more than two-thirds of these patients had stage IV disease.

In addition to significantly improved 1-year survival, the patients receiving gemcitabine-cisplatin had significantly longer median survival than those on cisplatin alone (9 months vs 7.6 months); a significantly higher response rate (26% vs 10%); and significantly longer median time to progression (5.2 months vs 3.7 months).

In the second trial of 135 patients with no prior chemotherapy, approximately 50% of whom were stage IV, gemcitabine-cisplatin was compared with cisplatin-etoposide. Those receiving gemcitabine had significantly higher response rates (33% vs 14%) and significantly longer median time to progression (5 months vs 4.1 months). Survival was not an endpoint for this trial, but results showed that 1-year survival probability was comparable between the two groups.

In the pivotal study, myelosuppression was the most common severe side effect and, as expected, occurred more frequently in the combination arm. There were four possibly treatment-related deaths with gemcitabine-cisplatin, three from myelosuppression. No such deaths occurred on the cisplatin-alone arm.

Other commonly reported side effects of the gemcitabine-cisplatin combination included nausea, vomiting, and alopecia. Kidney and sensory dysfunctions were also reported, but serious events were uncommon.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
  • ASCO: Yoga Reduces Insomnia in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Hormone Therapy
  • Physical Activity Across the Cancer Continuum
  • Exercise After Cancer Diagnosis: Time to Get Moving
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy