CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 13 No. 8 2
Early experience suggests efficacy is maintained 

Amifostine Provides Mucosal Protection in HNC Patients Treated With Chemoradiotherapy

By Program Chairman
Walter J. Curran, Jr., MD
Kimmel Cancer Center of Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia | August 1, 2004

MONTEGO BAY, JAMAICA- "Weekly carboplatin(Drug information on carboplatin) (Paraplatin) and paclitaxel(Drug information on paclitaxel) (Taxol) given concurrently with definitive radiotherapy and daily amifostine(Drug information on amifostine) (Ethyol) was well-tolerated by patients with advanced squamous cell head and neck cancers, and the cytoprotective agent amifostine appeared to decrease treatment-related toxicity," according to Mohan Suntharalingam, MD, vice chair of radiation oncology at the University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, Baltimore. Dr. Suntharalingam reported data from a prospective phase II trial evaluating the role of amifostine with this concurrent chemotherapy regimen at the 4th International Cytoprotection Investigators' Congress. Chemoradiation Doubles Toxicity "Few solid tumor sites have shown such good outcomes with combination radiation and chemotherapy as head and neck cancers, and combined-modality therapy is here to stay," Dr. Suntharalingam said. However, he noted that the regimens can result in a doubling of the rates of grade 3 or 4 mucosal toxicity, from about 24% with either chemotherapy or radiotherapy alone to about 43% with the combination. To address that problem, he and his colleagues conducted a prospective phase II trial to determine whether adding the cytoprotective agent amifostine could reduce mucosal toxicity without reducing tumor response. Dr. Suntharalingam reported data for 60 evaluable patients with unresectable stage III or IV squamous cell carcinomas of the head or neck. Patients were treated with daily radiation to the primary site up to 70.2 Gy (1.8 Gy/d) delivered with the shrinking field technique. Clinically involved nodes received the full dose, while uninvolved nodes received up to 50.4 Gy. Amifostine 500 mg IV was given less than 1 hour prior to radiotherapy. Concurrent weekly chemotherapy comprised of carboplatin 100 mg/m2 as a 30-minute infusion to AUC 1.5 and paclitaxel 40 mg/m2 IV as a 3-hour infusion. Majority Responded Dr. Suntharalingam reported that 82% of patients had complete responses (CR) at the primary site, and pathologic examination showed a CR rate of 73% in nodepositive patients. "Overall, 75% of patients had no evidence of disease following therapy," he said. Sixty percent of patients required treatment breaks, with a median duration of 1 day. Breaks were most often secondary to nausea/ vomiting (36%), dehydration (18%), dermatitis (11%), mucositis (5%), or neutropenia (5%). Most patients received all planned doses of amifostine. Three patients discontinued amifostine because of hypotension or nausea and vomiting. "It feels as if we are getting more therapy into these patients [with amifostine]," Dr. Suntharalingam said. He reported that the frequency of grade 3 xerostomia was 20% with amifostine, and noted that there was also only 20% grade 3 skin toxicity (no grade 4 toxicity). With regard to nonhematologic toxicities, patients who received amifostine seemed to experience toxicity later in the treatment period and require fewer treatment breaks, Dr. Suntharalingam said (see Figure 1). Leukopenia was somewhat higher with amifostine, but there was no decrease in efficacy. "Radiotherapy plus weekly carboplatin/ paclitaxel is a well-tolerated outpatient regimen with a complete response rate of 75% and an overall 5-year survival of 38%," Dr. Suntharalingam concluded. "Initial experience with the addition of amifostine suggests a benefit in terms of mucosal protection and xerostomia, while maintaining efficacy."

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.

1-8 Head and Neck
Cancer, Irradiation

9-11 Cervical Cancer

11-15 Non-Small-Cell

Lung Cancer
15 Lymphoma

16 Various Cancers

17-18 Acute Myelogenous
Leukemia




The 4th International Cytoprotection Investigators' Congress


 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Primary Care Can't Thrive Without Nurse Practitioners
Courtney H. Lyder, ND,  May 17, 2013
With a projected shortfall of primary-care physicians, it's time for alternate solutions to patient care. Nurse practitioners are one logical remedy.
VWhat Physicians Can Learn from the Allscripts EHR Lawsuit
Marisa Torrieri,  May 16, 2013
Lawsuit prompts question: What should physicians do to ensure they end up with a great EHR instead of buyer’s remorse?
Eight Ways ICD-9 Will Still Matter to Medical Practices
Brenda Edwards, CPC,  May 15, 2013
What should your medical practice do with your ICD-9-CM book after October 1, 2014? Keep it.
Seven Ways Technology Can Speed Up Patient Collections
Cheyenne Brinson,  May 15, 2013
Failing to adopt widely available billing and collections technology can cost medical practices big. Here's how to do it right.
Four Reasons Private Medical Practice is Becoming Extinct
Carol Stryker,  May 15, 2013
It’s becoming increasingly difficult for private medical practices to thrive. Here’s what’s driving the trend toward consolidation.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Skin Lesions
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • New AUA Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Screening
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • Genomics Studies Identify Testicular Cancer Risk Variants
  • Lower Back Pain in an Elderly Man With a History of Localized Prostate Cancer
  • FDA Approves Erlotinib (Tarceva) as First-Line Lung Cancer Therapy for Certain Patients
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy