LONDON-Capecitabine (Xeloda)
and oxaliplatin(Drug information on oxaliplatin) (Eloxatin), in combination
(XELOX), prior to synchronous
chemoradiation and total mesorectal excision
(TME), produces almost universal
tumor regression, rapid symptomatic response,
and allows R0 resection in patients
with poor risk/locally advanced rectal
cancer. These results were reported by
Ian Chau, MRCP, of the Royal Marsden
Hospital, London and Surrey, United
Kingdom (ASCO abstract 1087).
"After neoadjuvant treatment with capecitabine(Drug information on capecitabine)/oxaliplatin followed by
chemoradiation, tumor response was
achieved in all patients, "Dr. Chau reported.
"All patients then had R0 resection
with tumor regression away from the circumferential
resection margin (CRM),
except for one inoperable patient."
TME has been adopted as the standard
technique in rectal cancer by surgeons in
several European countries. CRM involvement,
defined as tumor observed in less
than or equal to 1 mm from the resection
margin, is an important prognostic factor
resulting in higher rates of local recurrence
and poorer survival in rectal cancer
surgery.
High-resolution, thin-slice magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown
to accurately stage rectal cancer and predict
potential CRM. MRI can provide an
objective method to define poor risk rectal
cancer, identify patients most likely to
benefit from a preoperative treatment
strategy, and assess primary tumor response.
Poor Risk Factors
In this study, patients were judged to
have poor risk rectal cancer if there were:
tumors within 1 mm of mesorectal fascia,
T3 tumors at/below levators, tumors extending
greater than or equal to 5 mm
into perirectal fat, T4 tumors, and
T1-4N2 tumors. All patients on the study
had tumor threatening CRM.
"In our previous study, neoadjuvant
protracted venous infusion fluorouracil(Drug information on fluorouracil)
(5-FU) and mitomycin(Drug information on mitomycin) (Mutamycin) as a
prelude to synchronous chemoradiation
was administered with negligible risk of
progression in the primary tumor and
evolution of metastatic disease. This approach
produced considerable symptomatic
response with associated tumor regression as neoadjuvant treatment," Dr.
Chau said. "Oxaliplatin and capecitabine
has been shown to have promising activity
as first-line treatment in metastatic
colorectal cancer and may provide better
efficacy than 5-FU and mitomycin as a
neoadjuvant treatment."
Treatment and Response
Patients received 12 weeks of neoadjuvant
capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2
bid po for 14 days and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 IV
every 3 weeks. Starting on week 13, capecitabine
was continued at 825 mg/m2 bid
continuously with concomitant radiotherapy
45Gy in 25 fractions followed by a 5.4-
9 Gy boost to the primary tumor. TME
was planned 6 weeks after chemoradiation.
Postoperatively, patients received 12
weeks of capecitabine at 1,250 mg/m2 bid.
MRI was repeated after chemotherapy and
chemoradiation.
From November 2001 to November
2002, 22 patients were recruited. Patients
had a median age of 62 years (range 38-
80), and a Eastern Cooperative Oncology
Group (ECOG) performance status of 0
(27.3%) or 1 (72.7%).
Following neoadjuvant capecitabine/
oxaliplatin, the objective response rate
was 94.7%. In addition, 93% of patients
had symptomatic responses in a median
of 23 days including reduced rectal bleeding
(100%), improvement in diarrhea/
constipation (75%), diminished pelvic
pain/tenesmus (93%), and weight gain/
stabilization (100%).
Following chemoradiation, tumor response
was achieved in all patients (see
Table 1). Pathologic complete response
was found in five patients (28%), and in
an additional nine patients (47%), only
microscopic tumor foci were found in
surgical specimens. Thirteen patients
(68.4%) had downstaging of their primary
tumor either in T (n = 3) or N (n = 3)
or both (n = 7) staging.
"No patients developed progressive
disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
or chemoradiation," Dr. Chau said. One
patient died from myocardial infarction
and one from pulmonary embolism. No
grade 4 toxicity occurred during chemotherapy
or chemoradiation.
Significance of Findings
In discussing the significance of these
findings, Dr. Chau noted, "Despite the
most optimal surgical approach in the
form of total mesorectal excision and highquality
preoperative radiotherapy, recent
studies have reported an unacceptably
high-15% to 20% rate of R1 resection-
microscopic incomplete resection at the
margin. Clearly, a more effective preoperative
treatment strategy needs to be implemented
in order to improve both local
control and survival. Our study reports,
for the first time, the implementation of a
preoperative treatment strategy based on
imaging assessment on the resection margin.
Moreover, all patients with threatened
and involved circumferential resection
margin based on preoperative MRI
were rendered margin negative on histology
after treatment."
