CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 12 No. 5 3
 

Substituting Liposomal for Free Vincristine in CHOP Could Permit Higher Therapeutic Doses

By Julie Vose, MD
University of Nebraska Medical Center | May 1, 2003

HOUSTON-Vincristine is efficacious for the treatment of aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), but can have significant neurotoxicity at therapeutic levels. Liposomal vincristine has a longer half-life and preferentially greater accumulation in tumor cells and lymph nodes than free vincristine, allowing the use of higher doses. In an early phase II trial of liposomal vincristine for the treatment of relapsed NHL, response rates of 10% for indolent lymphoma and 47% for aggressive lymphoma were observed in 51 patients.[1] Less than 22% of patients (11 of 51) reported neurotoxicity after a median injected dose of 3.8 mg (range, 2.6 to 4.8 mg) and a median of four injections (range, 1 to 12 injections), and all patients with neurotoxicity had previously reported neuropathy from prior treatment with paclitaxel(Drug information on paclitaxel) or platinum drugs. Vincristine is a component of the cyclophosphamide(Drug information on cyclophosphamide) (Cytoxan, Neosar), doxorubicin(Drug information on doxorubicin), vincristine (Oncovin), and prednisone(Drug information on prednisone) (CHOP) chemotherapy regimen. In elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma, complete response rates of 63% have been reported for CHOP alone and 76% for CHOP plus rituximab(Drug information on rituximab) (Rituxan).[2] Reduced Neurotoxicity Liposomal vincristine has reduced neurotoxicity relative to free vincristine. Substituting liposomal vincristine for free vincristine as a component of the CHOP regimen may lead to higher response rates with reduced toxicity.[3] Maria Rodriguez, MD, and colleagues at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, tested this hypothesis among 73 patients with previously untreated aggressive NHL (ASH abstract 338).[3] Approximately half of the patients presented with poor prognostic factors, including 36 patients who were older than 60 years of age and 30 patients who had International Prognostic Factor Index scores of 2 or higher. All patients in the study received standard-dose CHOP (cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, prednisone 100 mg, but substituting liposomal vincristine 2.0 mg/ m2 for free vincristine) for 5 days, plus six to eight courses of rituximab (375 mg/m2) every 21 days. Among the 66 patients who have completed treatment, the response rate was 100%; 62 patients had a complete response; 3 patients had an unconfirmed complete response (negative scan by positron emission tomography); and 1 patient had a partial response. After a median follow-up of 12 months, all patients were alive and only five patients had relapsed, of whom four were over 60 years old. Neuropathy with liposomal vincristine was mild (grade 0 to 2), and only 5 of 69 evaluable patients (7%) required dose adjustments because of neuropathy. Based on these results, the investigators concluded that CHOP with liposomal vincristine combined with rituximab is efficacious and well tolerated, particularly in elderly patients. The researchers urged the initiation of a randomized trial comparing this treatment regimen with standard CHOP plus rituximab to further evaluate this innovative modification.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.





Selected Reports From ASH 2002
Rituximab and Other Monoclonal Antibodies in the Treatment of Hematologic Malignancies
1. Sarris AH, Hagemeister F, Romaguera J, et al: Liposomal vincristine in relapsed non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas: early results of an ongoing phase II trial. Ann Oncol 11:69-72, 2000.
2. Coiffier B, Lepage E, Briere J, et al: CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-Bcell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 346:235- 242, 2002.
3. Rodriguez MA, Sarris A, East K, et al: A phase II study of liposomal vincristine in CHOP with rituximab for patients with untreated aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL): a safe and effective combination (abstract 338). Blood 100:92a, 2002.


 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
  • ASCO: Yoga Reduces Insomnia in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Hormone Therapy
  • Physical Activity Across the Cancer Continuum
  • Exercise After Cancer Diagnosis: Time to Get Moving
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy